Comparison of Online Dispute Resolution for Business Disputes in Indonesia and The United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v10i1.29994Keywords:
Online Dispute Resolution, Business Disputes, Comparative LawAbstract
This article examines the regulatory comparison and legal framework of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Indonesia and the United States, highlighting key differences in regulatory integration, technological infrastructure, and institutional synergy. The main problem identified is the fragmentation of ODR regulations in Indonesia, which lacks a comprehensive legal framework and faces significant challenges in ensuring legal certainty, effective enforcement, and public trust, especially among micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses and strengths of ODR systems in both countries and formulate strategic recommendations for developing a credible and adaptive ODR ecosystem in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method with a statute and analytical comparative approach, the study explores the regulatory basis, implementation models, and best practices from both jurisdictions. The findings show that the United States has successfully developed an integrated legal structure for ODR, supported by federal acts, technological innovations, and multi-stakeholder collaboration, which ensures enforcement and data protection. In contrast, Indonesia's ODR implementation is still hindered by sectoral regulations, limited digital literacy, and the absence of standard accreditation for online mediators and arbitrators. The analysis concludes that Indonesia urgently needs an integrated ODR law that includes clear definitions, standard operating procedures, accreditation requirements, and mechanisms for the recognition and enforcement of ODR decisions in the national judiciary. By adopting best practices from the United States, particularly regarding cross-sector integration, technological adaptation, and decision enforceability, Indonesia can strengthen its ODR framework to support fair, efficient, and reliable business dispute resolution in the digital era.
References
Adi, Danang Wahyu Setyo. “Analisis Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan Oleh Badan Arbitrase Internasional.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 1, no. 3 (2020): 39–51.
Aziz, Muhammad Faiz, and Muhamamd Arif Hidayah. “Perlunya Pengaturan Khusus Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Di Indonesia Untuk Fasilitasi Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 2 (August 2020): 275. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449.
Creutzfeldt, Naomi, and Ben Bradford. “Dispute Resolution Outside of Courts: Procedural Justice and Decision Acceptance Among Users of Ombuds Services in the UK.” Law & Society Review 50, no. 4 (December 2016): 985–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12234.
Dal Pubel, Luca. “E-Bay Dispute Resolution and Revolution: An Investigation on A Successful ODR Model.” In Conference Collaborative Economy: Challenges & Opportunities at: Barcelona, 2019.
Duca, Louis F. Del, Colin Rule, and Zbynek Loebl. “Facilitating Expansion of Cross-Border E-Commerce-Developing a Global Online Dispute Resolution System (Lessons Derived from Existing ODR Systems - Work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law).” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1970613.
Foster, II, Larry D., and Lawrence J. Trautman. “Alternative Dispute Resolution In Brief.” SSRN Electronic Journal 5, no. 2 (October 2023): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4383603.
Ishak, Nurfaika. “Guarantee of Information and Communication Technology Application Security in Indonesia: Regulations and Challenges?” Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) 4, no. 2 (May 2023): 108–17. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i2.26098.
Iswara, Vizta Dana. “Analisis Pentingnya Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Online Di Indonesia.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 1 (July 2021): 15. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v13i1.245.
Ivanchenko, Olga. “Legitimacy Of Law As Its Justification And Recognition.” Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 8, no. 4 (November 2022): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-4-77-83.
Karim, Abd, Rafidah, Ramlee Mustapha, Norwaliza Abd Wahab, Mohd Hasrol Hafizz Aliasak, Nurul Farhani Che Ghani, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. “Feminism and Gender Equality among Orang Asli Women: Implications for Customs and Laws.” Hasanuddin Law Review 11, no. 2 (August 3, 2025): 209–35. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v11i2.6317.
Kharisma, Dona Budi, and Nadzya Tanazal E.Ar. “Online Dispute Resolution as an Alternative Model for Dispute Settlement in The Financial Technology Sector.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 17, no. 1 (June 2022): 137–45. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.25267.
Leben, Steve. “Exploring the Overlap Between Procedural-Justice Principles and Emotion Regulation in the Courtroom.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 9, no. 5 (December 2019): 852–64. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1068.
Majambere, Esther. “Clarity, Precision and Unambiguity: Aspects for Effective Legislative Drafting.” Commonwealth Law Bulletin 37, no. 3 (September 2011): 417–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2011.595140.
Navlani, Manisha, and Rashi Agarwal. “Rethinking Online Arbitration.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2332784.
Niravita, Aprila. “Social Injustice in the Industrial Revolution 4.0.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 1, no. 2 (2020): 164. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.36509.
Nur Hidayati, Maslihati, Suartini, and Mardiana Saraswati. “Menggagas Penyelesaian Sengketa Online (Online Dispute Resolution) Pada Kegiatan Transaksi Elektronik Di Indonesia.” Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 10, no. 1 (February 2024): 225–44. https://doi.org/10.35326/pencerah.v10i1.4523.
Palanissamy, Ayyappan, and R. Kesavamoorthy. “Automated Dispute Resolution System (ADRS) – A Proposed Initial Framework for Digital Justice in Online Consumer Transactions in India.” Procedia Computer Science 165 (2019): 224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.01.087.
Patil, Dimple. “Artificial Intelligence In Financial Services: Advancements In Fraud Detection, Risk Management, And Algorithmic Trading Optimization,” 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5057412.
Pham, Hong Nhung, and Thi Thuy Lam Tran. “Shaping the Labor Market of Vietnam in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Comparative Insights from the European Union.” Hasanuddin Law Review 11, no. 3 (December 21, 2025): 274–94. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v11i3.5901.
Pongkapadang, Opniel Harsana B. Online Dispute Resolution Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Bogor: Divya Media Pustaka, 2026.
Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. “The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i1.37718.
Putri, Absonia Mebi Yunika. “Pelindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Dagang Antara Pemilik Usaha Dan Karyawan Umkm Bronsu/Bronsugar.” JHP17 (Jurnal Hasil Penelitian) 7, no. 1 (February 2022): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhp17.v7i1.6194.
Rifdah, Ayudia Nur, Mulyani Zulaeha, and Yulia Qamariyanti. “Commercial Business Dispute Settlement Through Online Non-Litigation Dispute Settlement in Indonesia.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2021): 267–87.
Rule, Colin. “Online Dispute Resolution and the Future of Justice.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16, no. 1 (October 2020): 277–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-043049.
Sapii, Rahmat Bijak Setiawan, and Ersa Hamzah. “Responsibilities of Business Actors to Consumers Due to Incompatibility of Objects and Specifications in Electronic Transaction Agreements.” Journal of Digital Law and Policy 1, no. 3 (May 2022): 103–10. https://doi.org/10.58982/jdlp.v1i3.240.
Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani, Jihyun Park, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. “Examining Personal Data Protection Law of Indonesia and South Korea: The Privacy Rights Fulfilment.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 1 (January 3, 2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5016.
Silveira Zanin, Henrique da, and Pedro Henrique Dias Alves Bernardes. “Technology and Access to Justice during the Pandemic: Online Dispute Resolution Development in Brazil and Japan.” Revista Tecnologia e Sociedade 18, no. 50 (2022): 1–18.
Singh, Bhanu Pratap, and Ankush Joshi. “Ethical Considerations in AI Development,” 156–79, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2964-1.ch010.
Sitorus, Winner. “Online Dispute Resolution: The Conceptualization of Business Dispute Resolution Model in Indonesia .” Hasanuddin Civil and Bussiness Law Review 1, no. 1 SE-Articles (January 2024): 34–41.
Sutanto, Marko Cahya. “The Existence of the Doctrine of Severability and Competence-Competence under the Constellation of Indonesian Arbitration Law.” Global Jurist 19, no. 2 (July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2018-0049.
Thiessen, Ernest, and Graham Ross. “Live Demonstration of a Working Collaborative Enegotiation System (Smartsettle Infinity).” In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 275–76. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462757.3466091.
Tjahjono, Heru Kurnianto, Meika Kurnia Puji Rahayu, and Awang Dirgantara Putra. “The Mediating Role Of Affective Commitment On The Effect Of Perceived Organizational Support And Procedural Justice On Job Performance Of Civil Servant.” Journal of Leadership in Organizations 2, no. 2 (August 2020). https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.55371.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Technology and the Future of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Platforms for Consumer Protection Agencies. United Nations, 2023. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213585993.
Wati, Herina, Tan Kamello, and Marlia Sastro. “The Development of Procedural Law Through the E-Court System After Pandemic in Indonesia.” Veteran Law Review 6, no. SpecialIssues (April 2023): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6iSpecialIssues.4957.
Wiantara, I Komang. “Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 4 (December 2018): 456. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i04.p04.
Wijaya, Viona. “Perubahan Paradigma Penataan Regulasi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 10, no. 2 (August 2021): 167. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i2.712.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
29994Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Opniel Harsana B Pongkapadang Opniel Harsana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.
