Ratio Decidendi of Judges Decisions on Grondkaart Land Disputes in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.3847Keywords:
Ratio Decidendi, Judge's Decision, GrondkaartAbstract
The impact of the existence of Grondkaart Land throughout Indonesia in its development has led to conflicts that can be classified into 4 (four): first, between the community and PT KAI; second, Indigenous people with PT KAI; third, City/Regency Government with PT KAI; and fourth, Sultanate/Palace with PT KAI. In general, community members who have controlled and utilised the Grondkaart land for many years feel they have the right to apply for property rights to the local Land Office. Meanwhile, PT KAI continues to maintain that these lands are legitimate PT KAI assets based on the history of the Indonesian Nation which gave birth to the Land Map or Grondkaart as evidence of land control instructions by PT KAI. in this research, a normative juridical research method is used by using several approaches, namely the Statute Approach (Legislation Approach), Conceptual Approach (Concept Approach), Case Approach (Case Approach), and Comparative Approach (Comparative Approach) by using descriptive analytical methods that aim to describe precisely. From this, it causes a lawsuit in court as the final estuary where to seek justice, but the Court Institution which is expected to be a place to find justice actually has a difference in views / Disparity between Judges in viewing Grondkaart Land evidence so as to cause legal uncertainty. From this legal uncertainty
References
Achmad, Willya. ‘Konflik Sengketa Lahan Dan Strategi Penyelesaian Di Indonesia’. Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik 6, no. 1 (2024): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v6i1.53280.
Amiruddin & Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Arie Sukanti Hutagalung dan Oloan Sitorus. Seputar Hak Pengelolaan. Yogyakarta: STPN Press, 2011.
Atikah, Noor. ‘Kedudukan Surat Keterangan Tanah Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia’. Notary Law Journal 1, no. 3 (13 July 2022): 263–89. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i3.29.
Bahrum. ‘ONTOLOGI, EPISTEMOLOGI DAN AKSIOLOGI’ 8, no. 2 (2013): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.24252/.v8i2.1276.
Boedi Harsono. Hukum Agraria Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanaannya . Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan, 2008.
Cornelis Van Vollenhoven. Orang Indonesia Dan Tanahnya. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Vol. 1854. Yogyakarta: : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasioal (STPN), 1923.
Hamidi, Hamidi, and Moh Abdul Latif. ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Di Wilayah Madura Secara Mediasi Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional’. YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 12, no. 1 (29 June 2021): 51. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i1.10546.
Hasaziduhu Moho. “Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan.” Jurnal Warta 13, No. 1 (2019): 138–49.. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349.
Iing R. Sodikin Arifin. ‘Pembinaan Yuridis Dalam Rangka Rapat Kerja Kantor Wilayah BPN Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 2019 Tanggal 26 April 2019’. Surabaya, 2019.
M. Yahya Harahap. HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Maria Sumardjono. Tanah Dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Budaya. Jakarta: Kompas, 2008.
Ochtorina S, Dyah. ‘PANCASILA DALAM TEORI JENJANG NORMA HUKUM HANS KELSEN’. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 4 (23 December 2021): 514. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i4.860.
Pajriani, Tira Reseki, Suci Nirwani, Muhammad Rizki, Nadia Mulyani, Tri Oca Ariska, and Sahrul Sori Alom Harahap. ‘EPISTEMOLOGI FILSAFAT’. PRIMER : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 3 (13 June 2023): 282–89. https://doi.org/10.55681/primer.v1i3.144.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Pertama Ce. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2007.
Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, and Hassanain Haykal. ‘Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?’ Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2 June 2022): 268. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.
Rafly, Muhamad, and Abdul Halim. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Masyarakat Adat Terhadap Asas Domain Verklaring Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Tentang Bank Tanah’. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 6, no. 3 (4 December 2023): 1136. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7351.
Rusmadi Murad. Menyingkap Tabir Masalah Pertanahan. Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju, 2007.
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. 1 Cet. 11. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2004.
Urip Susanto. ‘Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Hak Penguasaan Atas Tanah’. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 1 (2012): 186–96.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
3847Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammad Hamidi Masykur, Moh. Lu'ay Khoironi, Jimmy Firmansyah, Apriyas Munik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
