Model of Supervision of Unregistered Community Organisations in Order to Realise Legal Certainty in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.4179Keywords:
Community Organisation, Freedom, ProhibitionAbstract
As social creatures, humans have a tendency to live in society and organise their lives, which is guaranteed by the constitution, which provides guarantees for association and organisation. This freedom has implications where currently there are many community organisations that exist with various objectives, the existence of community organisations themselves in the country has been far more advanced in its work to empower the community. The problem is that CSOs currently have two forms, namely registered and unregistered, so there are problems in supervision. The variety of mass organisations gave birth to various groups, one of which was based on religious ideology, such as Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) which was dissolved on 19 July 2017. The Law on Mass Organisations affirms the principles that must be used in the establishment of mass organisations, one of the prohibitions is that mass organisations must not conflict with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. However, there is no definite formulation regarding the indicators of being contrary to Pancasila or Anti- Pancasila. Various restrictions are displayed in the form of prohibitions that show the existence of the existence of a mass organisation law. However, the application of the law should have a balance of inherent matters, namely between rights and obligations.
References
Amer, Nabih. ‘Analisis Pembubaran Organisasi Kemasyarakatan Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum’. Jurnal Legalitas 13, no. 01 (26 October 2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i01.5417.
Amitia Etzioni. Organisasi-Organisasi Modern. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), 1985.
Antonius Cahyadi dan E. Fernando M. Manulang. Pengantar Ke Filsafat Hukum. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2007.
Aulia, M. Zulfa. ‘Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa’. Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (7 July 2020): 201–36. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236.
Bakker, Edwin. ‘Exclusion: Who Decides — and on What Grounds? Hizb Ut-Tahrir and the HDIM’. Helsinki Monitor 18, no. 4 (2007): 278–88. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181407782713710.
Burhan Bungin. Sosiologi Komunikasi : Teori, Paradigma, Dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi Di Masyarakat. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Danuwidjaja, Arfan Fadhillah, and Manan Firman. ‘Hubungan Antara Kaderisasi Dan Ideologi Dalam Partai Politik: Studi Kasus Aktivitas Internal PDIP’. Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science 4, no. 1 (29 April 2023): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v4i1.119.
Galston, William A. ‘Civil Society and the “Art of Association”’. Journal of Democracy 11, no. 1 (January 2000): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0010.
Hutajulu, Juanda. ‘Tindakan Pemerintah Menegakkan Ideologi Pancasila Dalam Pembentukan Organisasi Kemasyarakatan’. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika 10, no. 2 (2 November 2022): 323. https://doi.org/10.33603/publika.v10i2.7707.
johnny Ibrahim. Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2005.
Latifah, Marfuatul. ‘Pelindungan HAM Dalam Mekanisme Pembubaran Ormas Berbadan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2017 (Human Rights Protection on Dissolution Mechanism of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) Based on Law No. 16 of 2007)’. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 11, no. 1 (23 June 2020). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v11i1.1584.
Maasum, Magfirah. ‘Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Ormas Yang Bertentangan Dengan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan’. Lex Crimen VI, no. 5 (2017): 5–12. http://nasional.warta10.com/toto-ormas-bukan-.
Marfiando, Bayu. ‘Pembubaran Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) Ditinjau Dari Kebebasan Berserikat’. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian 14, no. 2 (30 September 2020): 13. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v14i2.253.
Osgar S. Matompo. ‘Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Prespektif Keadaan Darurat’. Jurnal Media Hukum 21, no. 1 (2014): 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v21i1.1157.
Pramasella, Fenny. ‘Hubungan Antara Lima Besar Tipe Sifat Kepribadian Dengan Kesepian Pada Mahasiswa Rantau’. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi 7, no. 3 (23 September 2019). https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v7i3.4805.
Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
Sabela, A. R., & Pritaningtias, D. W. ‘Kajian Freedom of Speech and Expression Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Demonstran Di Indonesia Article Sidebar’. Lex Scientia Law Review 1, no. 1 (2017): 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v1i01.19484.
Siswanto, Wahyudi. ‘Implikasi Politik Hukum Kebebasan Berserikat Dan Hak Berorganisasi Pekerja/Buruh Dalam Produk Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Pelaksanaan Hubungan Industrial Di Indonesia’. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 7, no. 11 (2022): 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i11.11965.
Suparman Marzuki. ‘Perspektif Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia’. Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v6i3.98.
Widyawati Boediningsih, and Novi Prameswari Regina Dermawan. ‘Perkembangan HAM Di Indonesia Dan Problematikanya’. Education : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan 3, no. 2 (8 June 2023): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.51903/education.v3i2.336.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
4179Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nandu Dyanata, Abdul Rachmad Budiono, Tunggul Anshari, Prija Djatmika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
