Optimization of E-Litigation in the Settlement of Divorce Cases at the Bangkinang District Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.6434Keywords:
District Court, Divorce, E-Litigation, OptimizationAbstract
The presence of E-Litigation, a Supreme Court innovation to merge procedural law with technology, reflects Indonesian judicial administration in the digitalization era. The existence of E-Litigation as a practical application of the principle of simplicity, speed, and cheap cost is not yet optimal. The Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 on Electronic Court Case Administration regulates e-litigation proceedings. Improvements have been made to the legislation. Based on the foregoing, it is judged necessary and urgent to investigate optimizing e-litigation in the settlement of divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. The study sought to explain the effectiveness of e-litigation in resolving divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. Sociological legal research is an empirical study that seeks to uncover theories about the incidence of law in society. The data was gathered through interviews with judges Syofia Nisra, Ersin, and Aulia Fhatma Whidhola. Not only are the rules for e-litigation processes being reviewed, but so are the hurdles to e-litigation settlement of divorce cases at the Bangkinang District Court. This study is likely to make a significant contribution to legal innovation in the subject of civil procedure law. The settlement of divorce cases through e-litigation will alter the practice of litigating in court. The notion of complicating divorce is analogous to an emergency door on an airplane that should not be utilized unless necessary to overcome a problem. E-litigation processes at the Bangkinang Court have not gone smoothly because the parties do not comprehend and lack suitable electronic gadgets, even though the Court already possesses all of the necessary equipment and facilities.
References
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata : Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
Fisher, Simon. Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan Dan Strategi Untuk Bertindak. Edited by Sri Nurani Kartikasari. Jakarta: The British Council, 2001.
Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1977.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata : Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
HS, Salim, and Erlies Septiana Nurbani. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016.
Iqbal, Muhamad, Susanto Susanto, and Moh Sutoro. “Efektifitas Sistem Administrasi E-Court Dalam Upaya Mendukung Proses Administrasi Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2019): 302. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i2.7286.
Kurniawan, Andi. “Prospek Dan Tantangan Implementasi E-Court.” Majalah Peradilan Agama. Jakarta, November 2018.
Kurniawan, M. Beni. “Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) on the Civil Cases in Indonesia Court As a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.43-70.
Latifiani, Dian. “Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 157–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.44450.
Latifiani, Dian, and Raden Muhammad Arvy Ilyasa. “The Position of Moral Values in Law.” Diponegoro Law Review 6, no. 1 (2021): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.6.1.2021.51-61.
Latifiani, Dian, Anis Widyawati, Nurul Fibrianti, and Ayup Suran Ningsih. “Advocate as Law Enforcer in the Implementation of E-Court.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 11, no. 4 (2020): 439–49.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Buku Panduan E-Court.” Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2019.
———. Keputusan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dan Ketua Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Tentang Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim, Pub. L. No. 047/KMA/SKB/IV/2009, 1 (2009).
Mahkamah Konstitusi. “Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19 Tahun 2009 Tentang Tata Tertib Persidangan,” 2009.
Nader, Laura, ed. The Disputing Process-Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University, 1978.
Nugroho, Dewi Rahmaningsih, and Suteki Suteki. “Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana via Telekonferensi).” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 3 (2020): 291–304. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.291-304.
Pengadilan Agama Barabai. “Dasar Hukum E-Court,” 2020.
Pudjoharsoyo, A. S. “Arah Kebijakan Teknis Pemberlakuan Pengadilan Elektronik (Kebutuhan Sarana Dan Prasarana Serta Sumber Daya Manusia),” 2019.
Saleh, K. Wantjik. Hukum Acara Perdata Rbg/HIR. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1981.
Widowati. “Hambatan Dalam Implementasi Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan.” Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulungagung 7, no. 1 (2021): 94–114.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
6434Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pandecta Research Law Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
