LEMBAR KERJA DIRECTED ACTIVITIES RELATED TO TEXTS (DARTS) BERMUATAN MULTIPEL LEVEL REPRESENTASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS CALON GURU KIMIA

Muhamad Imaduddin(1), Sri Haryani(2),


(1) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Understanding the chemistry concept should be demonstrated by the ability to transfer and connect levels of chemical representation. This study aimed to produce DARTs-worksheets containing multiple levels of representation as learning media to improve critical thinking ability. The research used the R&D procedure including define-design-develop stages. One group pretest-posttest design is applied at the develop stage as a form of guarantee of worksheet quality. Data was collected through test techniques (critical thinking ability) as well as non-tests (assessment of the feasibility by experts, students and educators; activity observations; as well as interviews). The subject involved 49 pre-service chemistry teachers at two universities. The results showed that (1) it was produced four worksheets with characteristics that could be viewed from critical thinking skills, DARTs activities, and multiple levels of representation; (2) the DARTs worksheet got a positive rating, the level of "good and very good" for didactic, construction, and technical requirements, and showed the level of readability at the "high" level; (3) worksheets directed activities that indicate an increase in critical thinking ability. Important implications of this study indicated the need to uncover the symbolic learning patterns of chemistry by chemistry teachers in high school, especially compound nomenclature material, chemical reaction equations, and interpretation of graphs, tables, and curves.

Keywords

worksheets, DARTs, multiple levels of representation, mastery of chemical concepts, critical thinking ability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alev, N., 2010, Perceived Values of Reading and Writing In Learning Physics In Secondary Classrooms, Academic Journals. Scientific Research and Essays, Vol 5, No 11, Hal 1333-1345.

Arends, R. I., 2008, Learning to Teach (Belajar untuk Mengajar), Edisi ke-7, Diterjemhkan oleh Helly P.S & Sri Mulyani S., Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bucat, B. dan Mocerino, M., 2009, Learning at the Sub-micro Level: Structural Representations, Dalam Multiple Representation in Chemical Education: Models & Modelling in Science Education, Disunting oleh Gilbert, J. K & Treagust D. F., 11-29, Dordrecht: Springer.

Chittleborough, G. dan Treagust, D. F., 2007, The Modelling Ability of Non-Major Chemistry Students and Their Understanding of The Sub-Microscopic Level, Chemistry Education Research and Practice The Royal Society of Chemistry, Vol 8, No 3, Hal 274-292.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., dan Morrison, K., 2007, Research Methods in Education. Edisi ke-6, New York: Routledge.

Costa, A., 1985, Developing Minds. Roseville, California: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Davies, F. dan Greene, T., 1984, Reading for Learning in The Science, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

Dori, Y.J. dan Hameiri, M., 2003, Multidimensional Analysis System for Quantitative Chemistry Problems: Symbol, Macro, Micro, and Process Aspects, Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, Vol 40, No 3, Hal 278–302.

Farida, I., 2012, Interkoneksi Multipel Level Representasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru pada Kesetimbangan dalam Larutan melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Web, Disertasi, Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Grady, M.K.J. 2009, Development of Scientific Literacy by Incorporating Directed Activities Related to Text in a College-level Conceptual Chemistry Course, Tesis, Sacramento: California State University.

Heselden, R. dan Staples R., 2002, Science Teaching and Literacy, part 2: Reading, School Science Review, Vol 83, No 304, Hal 51-62.

Hinton, M.E. dan Nakhleh, M.B., 1999, Students’ Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions, Chemistry Educator, Vol 4, No 5, Hal 158-167.

Johnstone, A.H., 2000a, Chemical Education Research: Where from Here?, Proceeding University Chemistry Education, Vol 4, No 1, Hal 34-38.

Johnstone, A.H., 2000b, Teaching of Chemistry - Logical Or Psychological?, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice In Europe, Vol 1, No 1, Hal 9-15.

Liliasari, L., 2011, Membangun Masyarakat Melek Sains Berkarakter Bangsa melalui Pembelajaran, Semarang: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2011 UNNES.

Özmen, H. dan Yildirim, N., 2005, Effect of Work Sheets on Student’s Success: Acids and Bases Sample, Journal of turkish science education, Vol 2, No 1, Hal 10-13.

Raymond, P., 1988, Cloze Procedure in the Teaching of Reading, TESL Canada Journal, Vol 6, No 1, Hal 91-197.

Santrock, J. W., 2007, Perkembangan Anak Jilid 1, Terjemahan Mila Rachmawati & Anna Kuswanti, Edisi ke-11, Jakarta: Erlangga.

Senam, S., Arianingrum, R., Permanasari, L., dan Suharto, S., 2008, Efektivitas Pembelajaran Kimia untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI dengan Menggunakan LKS Kimia Berbasis Life Skil, Didaktika, Vol 09, No 3, Hal 280-290.

Talanquer, V., 2011, Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The Many Faces Of The Chemistry “Tripletâ€, International Journal of Science Education, Vol 33, No 2, Hal 179-195.

Taylor, W. L., 1953, Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability, Journalism Quarterly, Vol 30, Hal. 414-433.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S. dan Semmel, M. I., 1974, Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/ Special Education, University of Minnesota.

Treagust, D.F. dan Chandrasegaran, C., 2009, The Efficacy of An Alternative Instructional Programme Designed to Enhance Secondary Students’ Competence in The Triplet Relatioship, Dalam Multiple Representation in Chemical: Models & Modelling in Science Education, disunting oleh J.K & D. Treagust Gilbert, 151-164. Dordrecht: Springer.

Tuysuz, M., Ekiz, B., Uzuntiryaki, E., Tarkin, A., dan Kutucu, E.S., 2011, Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of Phase Changes and Dissolution at Macroscopic, Symbolic, and Microscopic Levels, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier, Vol 15, Hal 452-455.

Wellington, J. dan Osborne, J., 2011, Language and Literacy In Science Education, Philladelphia: Open University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.