Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya: Literatur Review

Deni Ainur Rokhim(1), Sri Rahayu(2), I Wayan Dasna(3),


(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis trend penelitian miskonsepsi kimia peserta didik pada tingkat SMA dan instrumen diagnosisnya. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Data penelitian diperoleh, dari 20 artikel yang diseleksi pada basis data Eric, Scopus, Google Schoolar, Crosccef yang terindikasi dari tahun 2015 hingga 2021. Artikel yang dipilih memiliki kesamaan topik terhadap analisis miskonsepsi. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa publikasi artikel miskonsepsi peserta didik di tingkat SMA enam tahun terakhir mengalami penurunan miskonsepsi, dan ditemukan lagi miskonsepsi yang lain, yang berarti penelitian miskonsepsi masih menjadi fokus penelitian saat ini dan masalah miskonsepsi kimia masih sering terjadi pada peserta didik SMA. Penyebab miskonsepsi kimia pada peserta didik mayoritas terjadi karena faktor internal berupa ketidaksesuaian prakonsepsi peserta didik dengan konsep ilmuwan. Pengembangan instrumen diagnostik yang digunakan tes Two-Tier, tes Three-Tier, tes Four-Tier, tes Five-Tier, Kuesioner dan soal pilihan ganda bersifat open –ended Jager, dan Essay Diagnostic Test of Chemistry merupakan metode untuk mendeteksi miskonsepsi kimia yang sering dikembangkan dalam penelitian. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengungkap bahwa tidak ada perbedaan hasil tentang instrumen yang digunakan dan miskonsepsi yang ditemukan antar lintas negara

Keywords

Instrument diagnostik; materi kimia; miskonsepsi,; review.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akmali, A. A. (2018). Konstruksi Four-Tier Test Untuk Mengidentifikasi Level Dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Kalor. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 274–284.

Amry, U. W., & Rahayu, S. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Pada Pembelajaran Konvensional Dan Dual Situated Learning Model ( DSLM ). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(3), 385–391.

Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H. K. (2019). Developing a five-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ misconceptions in science: an example of the heat transfer concepts. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690

Astuti, F., Redjeki, T., & Nurhayati, N. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Dan Penyebabnya Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Mia Sma Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 Pada Materi Pokok Stoikiometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Sebelas Maret, 5(2), 10–17.

Fitriza, Z., Aini, F. Q., Handayani, P., & Munira, I. (2020). Development of structured essay diagnostic test of chemistry (SEDToC) to investigate senior high school student’s conception of buffer solution. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2229, 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003289

Fitriza, Z., & Padang, U. N. (2021). Development of Structured Essay Diagnostic Test of Chemistry Student Learning Outcomes. 524–529.

Habiddin, H., & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and Validation of a Four-Tier Diagnostic Instrument for Chemical Kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218

Habiddin, H., Utari, J. L., & Muarifin, M. (2020). Diagnostic Tool to reveal Student’s Conception on Thermochemistry. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICoMSE), 1–7.

Harahap, I. P. P., & Novita, D. (2021). Identify Misconception on Reaction Rate Concept Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4Tmc) Diagnostic Test Instrument. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcer.v5n1.p6-11

Hayati, S., Siadauruk, S., & Abudarin. (2018). Kesulitan Siswa Memahami Pereaksi Pembatas Di SMA Kabupaten Barito Utara Dan Kota Palangka Raya Tahun Pelajaran 2015/ 2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 9(2), 114–132.

Hidayat, F. A., Irianti, M., & Faturrahman, F. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa dan Faktor Penyebabnya pada Pembelajaran Kimia di Kabupaten Sorong. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), 1–8.

Horvat, S. A., Mihajlović, J., Rončević, T., & Rodic, D. (2021). Procedure for the assessment of cognitive complexity: Development and implementation in the topic “Hydrolysis of salts.” Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 40(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2021.2240

Jenkins, J. L., & Shoopman, B. T. (2019). Identifying misconceptions that limit student understanding of molecular orbital diagrams. Science Education International, 30(3), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.1

Jusniar, J, Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Developing a three-tier diagnostic instrument on chemical equilibrium (TT-DICE). Educación Química, 31(3), 84–102. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2020.3.72133

Jusniar, Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Misconceptions in rate of reaction and their impact on misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1405–1423. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1405

Kurniawan, M. A., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Dual Situated Learning Model in Improving High School Students’ Conceptions of Chemistry Equilibrium and Preventing Their misconceptions. Journal of Science Learning, 3(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.22277

Lestari, N. A., Wijayati, N., & Haryani, S. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Materi Asam Basa Menggunakan Two-Tier Berbantuan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Chemistry in Education, 9(2), 48–54.

Linenberger, K. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Generating cognitive dissonance in student interviews through multiple representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90064A

Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Development of the bonding representations inventory to identify student misconceptions about covalent and ionic bonding representations. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400700q

Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2019). Misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3990

Maratusholihah, N. F., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2017). Hidrolisis Garam Dan Larutan Penyangga. 919–926.

Meltafina, M., Wiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2019). Misconceptions and threshold concepts in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042030

Milenković, D. D., Hrin, T. N., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a Three-Tier Test as a Valid Diagnostic Tool for Identification of Misconceptions Related to Carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514–1520. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261

Mubarak, S., & Yahdi. (2020). Identifying undergraduate students’ misconceptions in understanding acid base materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23193

Mutlu, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2015). Development of a Two-tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Undergraduates’ Understanding of Some Chemistry Concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.593

Nurul Nadiah Rosly, Abd Hamid, S., & Nor Azlina A. Rahman. (2021). Exploring the Perception of Chemistry Students at Kulliyyah of Science in Learning Organic Chemistry. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 9(2), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v9i2.299

Pérez, J. R. B., Pérez, M. E. B., Calatayud, M. L., & Sabater, J. V. (2017). Student ’ s Misconceptions on Chemical Bonding : A Comparative Study between High School and First Year University Students. 05(01), 1–15.

Prihastyanti, N., Rokhim, D. A., Subandi, S., & ... (2020). Development of Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Based Learning Materials To Facilitate Students in Improving Critical …. Jurnal Pembelajaran …, 4(December), 67–73. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpsi/article/view/17282

Prodjosantoso, A. K., Hertina, A. M., & Irwanto. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488.

Qodriyah, N. R. L., Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Habiddin, H. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI Sma Negeri 4 Malang Pada Materi Hidrokarbon Menggunakan Instrumen Diagnostik Three Tier. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2642–2651.

Rahayu, S., & Kita, M. (2010). An Analysis of Indonesian and Japanese Students ’ Understandings of Macroscopic and Submicroscopic Levels of Representing Matter and its Changes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education (2010), 8, 667–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9180-0

Rahayu, S., Treagust, D. F., Chandrasegaran, A. L., Kita, M., & Ibnua, S. (2011). Assessment of electrochemical concepts: A comparative study involving senior high-school students in Indonesia and Japan. Research in Science and Technological Education, 29(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2010.536949

Rosita, I., Liliawati, W., & Samsudin, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Five-Tier Newton’s Laws Test (5TNLT) Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 6(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v6i2.2018

Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2016). Understanding misconceptions: Teaching and learning in middle school physical science. American Educator, 40(1), 26–32.

Safitri, N. C., Nursaadah, E., & Wijayanti, I. E. (2019). Analisis Multipel Representasi Kimia Siswa pada Konsep Laju Reaksi. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v4i1.5023

Sari, C. W., & Helsy, I. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Tiga Level Representasi Siswa Pada Konsep Asam-Basa Menggunakan Kerangka Dac (Definition, Algorithmic, Conceptual). JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 3(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v3i2.3660

Setiawan, D., & Faoziyah, N. (2020). Development of a Five-Tier Diagnostic Test to Reveal the Student Concept in Fluids. Physics Communication, 4(27), 6–13.

Sihaloho, M., Hadis, S. S., Kilo, A. K., & Kilo, L. (2021). Diagnosa Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Telaga Gorontalo pada Materi Termokimia. 3, 7–13.

Siswaningsih, W., Firman, H., Zackiyah, & Khoirunnisa, A. (2017). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Pictorial-Based for Identifying High School Students Misconceptions on the Mole Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Soeharto, Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649

Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2018). Development of an instrument and evaluation patter for for the analyisis of chemistry student teachers` diagnostic competence. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 9(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/80707

Tsaparlis, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2018). Teaching and learning chemical bonding: Research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1253–1269. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00035b

Tupan, T., Rahayu, R. N., Rachmawati, R., & Rahayu, E. S. R. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 39(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.413

Türkoguz, S. (2020). Investigation of Three-Tier Diagnostic and Multiple Choice Tests on Chemistry Concepts with Response Change Behaviour. International Education Studies, 13(9), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n9p10

Warsito, J. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Topik Ikatan Kimia Serta Perbaikannya dengan Pembelajaran Model ECIRR. 1563–1572.

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., Mulyani, S., Rokhim, D. A., & Habiddin, H. (2021). Multiple Representation-Based Learning through Cognitive Dissonance Strategy to Reduce Student ’ s Misconceptions in Volumetric Analysis. TEM Journal, 10(1263–1273). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Yan, Y. K., & Subramaniam, R. (2018). Using a multi-tier diagnostic test to explore the nature of students’ alternative conceptions on reaction kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00143F

Yunitasari, I., Widarti, H. R., & Nazriatin. (2019). Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Berbasis Multipel Representasi pada Lintas Jenjang Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian Dan Penemabangan, 4(12), 1635–1642.

Zidny, R., Sopandi, W., & Kusrijadi, A. K. (2015). Gambaran Level Submikroskopik Untuk Menunjukkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Persamaan Kimia Dan Stoikiometri. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v1i1.326

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.