Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Berbantuan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Pembelajaran Laju dan Orde reaksi

Cicik Fantiani(1), Muhammad Win Afgani(2), Resti Tri Astuti(3),


(1) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
(2) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
(3) UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Abstract

Misconceptions show because there is a concept that is not in accordance with the actual concept. The purpose of this study is to find out the misconceptions experienced by class XI students in the material rate and order of reaction with certainty of response index (CRI). Then to be able to find out the cause of the misconception in class XI students in understanding the concept of rate and order of reaction by using the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) method. This type of research is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Lempuing class XI of the 2020/2021 school year at the OIC lempuing. Instruments used test sheets, student questionnaires and interview sheets. The results of the analysis of research data showed that there are learners who understand 15%, misconception level 1 in learners with a percentage of 56%, misconceptions of level 2 with a percentage of 4%. While students who do not understand get a percentage of 35%. Aspects of the causes of the misconception of learners are the factors of learners themselves, factors in the use of learning methods and textbook factors that there are many errors.

Keywords

Certainty of Response Index (CRI), Misconceptions, Rate and order of reactions,

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al Qadri, A. R., Alhaq, P. M., Muthmainnah, N., Irpadilla, M. A., Herlina, Aulia S, N., et al. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMAN 1 Gowa Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Instrumen Three Tier Diagnostik Test. Nalar Pendidikan, 7(1), 46-52.

Dahar, & Wilis, R. (1989). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Effendy. (2002). Upaya Untuk Mengatasi Kesalahan Konsep Dalam Pengajaran Kimia Dengan Menggunakan Strategi Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Ilmu Kimia dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 120.

Faizah, K. (2016). Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 8(1), 115-128.

Irsanti, R., Khaldun, I., & Hanum, L. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four- TierDiagnostic Test pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Larutan Non Elektrolit di Kelas X SMA Islam Al-falah Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia, 2(3), 230-237.

Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., & Ratman. (2016). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Banawa Tengah Pada Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga Dengan CRI (Certainty Of Response Index) ). Akademika KIm, 5(2), 85-90

Medina, P. (2015). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non elektrolit Serta Reaksi Oksidasi Dan Reduksi Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Di SMAN Kota Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1), 1-9.

Ramdhani, M. A. (2014). Lingkungan Pendidikan Dalam Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter.

Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 8(1), 28-37.

Sutirna. (2019). Landasan Kependidikan. Yogyakarta: Andy Ofset.

Umam, Y. I., Iskandar, S. M., & Budiasih, E. (2015). Analisis Dampak Kesalahan Konsep Laju Reaksi Terhadap Kesalahan Konsep Kesetimbangan Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 3(2), 68-73.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.