Digital Learning Culture in The Pandemic Period for Adults at The Community Learning Center (CLC) in Bandung
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Departemen Pendidikan Masyarakat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(5) Kaohsiung Medical University
Abstract
Community Learning Center (CLC) as a community education unit, has a participatory local approach to program requirements and implementation. During the Covid pandemic, all educational learning unit activities in Bandung were directed by the use of distance learning channels, using the internet as a learning channel. However, the pandemic is a global problem with a fluctuating and urgent number of developments, so the readiness of the education unit is a problem, because the majority of the population studying CLC are adults without school age. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach with survey methods to 43 CLC institutions in the city of Bandung with 228 respondents as research residents. The results of the study show that CLC has facilitated learning residents to discuss by providing zoom meeting services, google meet and utilizing Whatsapp as a learning channel. Digital-based adult learning education has been implemented in CLC throughout the city of Bandung in the learning system, although there are still some CLC that are needed along with readiness for digitization. The inhibiting factor is for residents who study the category of adult digital immigrants, they still need to be assisted by the closest people to operate digital devices.
Keywords
References
Adiyono, N. G., Rahmat, T. Y., & Anindita, R. (2021). Digital Marketing Strategies To Increase Online Business Sales Through Social Media. Journal of Humanities, Social Science, Public Administration and Management (HUSOCPUMENT), 1(2), 31–37.
Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Fraillon, J. (2016). A global measure of digital and ICT literacy skills.
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380–400.
Blackley, S., & Sheffield, R. (2015). Digital andragogy: A richer blend of initial teacher education in the 21st century. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 397–414.
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369.
Chen, L. L., Mirpuri, S., Rao, N., & Law, N. (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. Educational Research Review, 33, 100379.
Connolly, B. (2003). Community Education: Listening to the voices. The Adult Learner, 10, 9–19.
Dasli, M. (2019). UNESCO guidelines on intercultural education: a deconstructive reading. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(2), 215–232.
Decelle, G. (2016). Andragogy: A fundamental principle of online education for nursing. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, 9(2), 1263–1273.
Driscoll, M. (2010). Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences. John Wiley & Sons.
Farmer, L. (2013). New perspectives of andragogy in relation to the use of technology. In Digital Literacy: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1606–1621). IGI Global.
Forrest III, S. P., & Peterson, T. O. (2006). It’s called andragogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1), 113–122.
Galustyan, O. v, Borovikova, Y. v, Polivaeva, N. P., Kodirov, B. R., & Zhirkova, G. P. (2019). E-learning within the Field of Andragogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9).
Halupa, C. M. (2015). Pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy. In Transformative curriculum design in health sciences education (pp. 143–158). IGI Global.
Hufad, A., Wahyudin, U., Sadikin Akhyadi, A., Sutarni, N., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Model Digital Needs Assessment Program of Community Empowerment. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 401–411.
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533–541.
Kerlinger, F. N. (2004). Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral (Terj.). Landung R. Simatupang,(Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 1996), Cet, 5.
Kohli, C., Suri, R., & Kapoor, A. (2015). Will social media kill branding? Business Horizons, 58(1), 35–44.
McCann, A., & MacMahon, C. (2021). Practical Lessons in Andragogy and Constructivism: an Exploratory Study of Mature, Part-time Undergraduate Engineering Learner Experiences of Digital Learning Objects. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 9(1), 5.
O’Doherty, D., Dromey, M., Lougheed, J., Hannigan, A., Last, J., & McGrath, D. (2018). Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education–an integrative review. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–11.
Parker, J. (2012). Engaging traditional learning and adult learning via information technologies. In Pedagogical and andragogical teaching and learning with information communication technologies (pp. 165–177). IGI Global.
Perdana, R., Yani, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Assessing students’ digital literacy skill in senior high school Yogyakarta. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 169–177.
Porlezza, C., & Russ-Mohl, S. (2013). Getting the facts straight in a digital era: Journalistic accuracy and trustworthiness. In Rethinking journalism (pp. 45–59). Routledge.
Purnomo, Hufad, A., Wahyudin, U., Akhyadi, A. S., & Lutfiansyah, D. Y. (2020). Needs Assessment Knowledge from Facilitator of Community Empowerment Program in the Digital Era. Journal of Nonformal Education, 6(2), 130–138.
Purnomo, Hufad, A., Wahyudin, U., Akhyadi, A. S., Sutarni, N., & Rahmat, A. (2020). Model digital needs assessment program of community empowerment. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 401–411.
Sharp, L. A. (2018). Collaborative Digital Literacy Practices among Adult Learners: Levels of Confidence and Perceptions of Importance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 153–166.
Siddiq, F., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2017). Learning in Digital Networks–ICT literacy: A novel assessment of students’ 21st century skills. Computers & Education, 109, 11–37.
Srinivasan, L. (1977). Perspectives on Nonformal Adult Learning. Functional Education for Individual, Community, and National Development.
Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Gomez, S. C., & Van Den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model. Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
Wang, V. C. X., Farmer, L., Parker, J., & Golubski, P. M. (2011). Pedagogical and andragogical teaching and learning with information communication technologies. Information Science Reference [Imprint].
Widodo, T. (2008). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Surakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan (LPP) UNS Dan UPT Penerbitan Dan Pencetakan UNS.
Zuckerman-Parker, M. (2008). Andragogy and technology. In Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration (pp. 30–36). IGI Global.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Uyu Wahyudin, Purnomo , Eko Sulistiono, Muhammad Faisal Najmudin, Apriza Hongko Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.