STRATEGI ADAPTASI SIMBOLIK PEMBATIK YANG TERMARGINALKAN TERHADAP HEGEMONI PASAR

Casta Casta

Abstract

The structure of Trusmi-Cirebon batik actors release some entrepreneurs who have capital strength which hegemony the market and the marginalized craftsman. This study aimed to understand the hegemony patterns of batik market and symbolic adaptation strategies of artisans who are marginalized in the creation of designs, marketing, and interpreting internal conflicts. Research used a qualitative approach using a type of phenomenological research. The results of this study showed that the market hegemony was carried out by showroom, produced batik with thecategory of anggon batik, the used of silk materials, and adapted to market interest. On the other hand, marginalized craftsman of Trusmi batik face the hegemony of batik market by carried out the design creation strategy by making batik with the category of obrogan, made a typical of traditional batik motifs, not used silk and another similar materials, avoided showrooms market, and used the service of pengeber, yarnen and yarlud. They choose to avoid internal conflicts by considering batik as a joint property which was an ancestral heritage. It was concluded that the symbolic adaptation strategy of marginalized craftsmen was conducted to maintain the balance (homeostasis), order, and social integration

Keywords

market hegemony; marginalized craftsmen; symbolic adaptation strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. (2002). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Anas, Biranul. (1999. Indonesia Indah “Batikâ€. Jakarta Yayasan Harpan Kita/ BP 3 TMII.

Creswel, John W.(1994). Researrch Design Qualitatif & Quantitative Approach. London: Sage Publications.

Djoemena, Nian S. (1990). Batik dan Mitra. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Hadi W.M., Abdul. (2000). Islam: Cakrawala Estetik dan Budaya. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.

Hasanudin. (2001). Batik Pesisir. Bandung: Kiblat Utama Buku.

Jabbar Beg, Abdul. (1988). Seni di Dalam Peradaban Islam. Terjemahan Yustiono dan Edi Sutriyono. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.

Julianita, Nita. (1997). Batik Nan Cantik. Bandung: Bagian Proyek pembinaan Permuseuman Jawa Barat.

Miles, Matthew and Huberman, A. Michael. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Moersid, Ananda Fer. (2013). Reinvensi Batik dan Identitas Indonesia dalam Arena Pasar Global. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya Volume 1 Nomor 2 Juli-Agustus 2013.

Rohidi, Tjetjep Rohendi. (1994). Pendekatan Sistem Sosial Budaya dalamPendidikan. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Rohidi, Tjetjep Rohendi. (2000a). Ekspresi Seni Orang Miskin: Adaptasi Simbolik Terhadap kemiskinan. Bandung: Yayasan Nuansa Cendekia.

Rohidi, Tjetjep Rohendi. (2000b). Kesenian Dalam Pendekatan Kebudayaan. Bandung: Penerbit STSI.

Sedyawati, Edi. (1999). Cirebon Sebagai Jalur Sutera. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Sunarya, Yan Yan. (2018). “Adaptasi Unsur Estetik Sunda pada Wujud Ragam Hias Batik Sundaâ€, Jurnal Visual Art & Desain Volume 10 No. 1, 2018, 27-51

Toekio M, Soegeng, (1987). Mengenal Ragam Hias Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.

Yudoseputro, Wiyoso. 1993. Pengantar Wawasan Seni Budaya. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.