The Difference of Students’ Learning Outcomes between STAD Model and Discussion Model on Economics Subject

Ruski Ruski(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v11i1.8654


(1) Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Madura, Indonesia

Abstract

This research aims to identify the difference of students’ learning outcomes between STAD cooperative learning model and discussion model on economics subjects. This research was conducted at class X Senior High School 1 in Surabaya. It was an experimental study using a Nonequivalent Control Group Design research design. The total numbers of students were 140 students. Samples were taken by using purposive random sampling technique. 69 students were analyzed as sample. They were divided into two classes. One class was as a control class (X IPS3) with 35 students and another was as experimental class (X IPS1) with 34 students. Collecting data used post test and pre test. Findings show that there are differences on students’ learning outcomes significantly between STAD cooperative learning model (experimental class) and discussion (control class) on economics subjects. It is proven by the results of the calculation of the Z test was greater than 0.05 (4.679 > 0.05), hypothesis is accepted and the mean score at experimental class is higher than the control class (82.29 > 74.03). Thus; the implementation of STAD method gives good influence on students’ learning outcomes.

Keywords

Learning Outcome, STAD, Economics

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amaludin, A. (2010). Keefektivan Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Pada Pembelajaran Ekonomi Berbasis Konstruktivis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Dinamika Pendidikan, 5(1), 92-102

Awofala, A. O. A., Fatade, A. O., & Ola-Oluwa, S. A. (2012). Achievement in cooperative versus individualistic goal-structured Junior Secondary School Mathematics Classrooms in Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 3(1), 7-12.

Tarim, K., & Akdeniz, F. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics using TAI and STAD methods. Educational studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 77-91.

Kusmuryanto & Burhan. (2009). Implementasi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Diklat Produktif Kompetensi Mengelola Kartu Piutang. Dinamika Pendidikan, 4(2)

Lusianti, M. (2014). Penerapan Metode Diskusi Syndicate Group Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Pada Pokok Bahasan Mendeskripsikan Hubungan Antara Kelangkaan Sumber Daya Dengan Kebutuhan Manusia Yang Tidak Terbatas Siswa Kelas Viii B Di Smp Negeri 2 Banyubiru. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 2(3).

Majoka, M. I., Dad, M. H., & Mahmood, T. (2010). Student team achievement division (STAD) as an active learning strategy: Empirical evidence from mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Sociology, 4, 16-20.

Nurafni. (2010). Peningkatan Motivasi Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Student Teams-AcievementmDivisions Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X-3 Di Sma 8 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Garuda Dikti

Nurseto, T. (2009). Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Aktif Learning Dalam Pelajaran Ekonomi Pada Smu Negeri Di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 6(2), 167-176

Slavin, R. E. (2011). Cooperative Leraning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media

Solehatin, E. & Raharjo. (2009). Cooperative Learning Analisis Model Pembelajaran IPS. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfa Beta

Suratno. (2013). Pengaruh Penerapan Metode STAD terhadap hasil belajar ekonomi ditinjau dari hasil belajar dan minat siswa di SMA N 10 Batanghari. Dinamika Pendidikan, 2(1), 111-122

Syah, M. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Taryadi. (2013). Penerapan Model STAD dengan Media Digital Word Square Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep pada Kompetensi Dasar Uang Dan Lembaga Keuangan. Dinamika Pendidikan, 8(1), 52-58

Tohirin. (2007). Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Grafindo Persada.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.

Van Wyk, M. M. (2012). The effects of the STAD-cooperative learning method on student achievement, attitude and motivation in economics education. Journal of Social Science, 33(2), 261-270.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.