SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS OF PARTIAL PRODUCTIVITY INDEX TO DETERMINE QUALITY OF SCHOOL

Anita Rinawati, Mutrofin Mutrofin

Abstract


Is not an easy thing to select Senior High School (SMA).The new students recieving programme hold before new academic year in July make the parents of students who have just graduated from Junior High School confused. Generally, the reason to select favourite school is based on a wrong public opinion. Selecting Senior High School (SMA) is supposed to rely on the quality of Instructional work. One of Indicators of the instructional work quality is a productivity level. This research aims to reveal partial productivity index of Senior High Schools (SMA) located in Jember City and sequence them in top ten category. This research belongs to descriptive research which emphasizes on two things. The first emphasis is on the final score of national examination (NEM) obtained by Junior high School Students who graduated in academic year of 2011/2012 as the input while the second is the final score of national examination obtained by Senior high School (SMA) students who graduated in 2013 as the output. The analysis is meant to find out the comparation result index betwen input and output score. The research result shows that 10 of 15 Senior High Schools located in Jember City have productivity level around 68,33% up to 98,46%.


Keywords


partial productivity, Senior High School

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aigner, Walter. 1986. Motivation and Awareness. the paper was presented in Fifth World Productivity Congress in Jakarta, 14 April 1986. Jakarta: The World Confederation of Productivity Sciences.

Babbie, Earl. 1993. The Practice of Social Research. Belmont California: Wodsworth Publishing Company, Inc.

Brinkerhoff, Robert O. dan Dennis E. Dresser. 1990. Productivity Measurement: A Guide for Managers and Evaluators. NP. California: Sage Publication.

Dedi Supriadi. 2000. Jaring Pengaman Sosial Pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Depdikbud. 1994. Kurikulum 1994 Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta:

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Drucker, Peter F. 1980. The Age of Productivity. London: William Heinemann.

Fraser, Barry J. et.al. 1987. Syntheses of Educational Productivity Research.

International Journal of Educational Research. 11: 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Gibson, J.L. et.al. 1973. Organizations: Structure, Process, Behavior. Dallas, Texas: Business Publication Inc.

Hidayat. 1986. Konsep Dasar dan Pengertian Produktivitas serta Interpretasi Hasil Pengukurannya. Prisma, November 1986. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Jamien A. Tahir. 1986. Hubungan Pengusaha dan Karyawan dalam Meningkatkan Produktivitas. Prisma, November 1986. Jakarta: LP3ES.

King, Alison. 1994. Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31: 2. Washington D.C.: AERA Publication.

Mutrofin. 1999. Menyoal Transparansi Indeks Mutu Sekolah. Solopos, edisi 12 Juni 1999.

Riggs, James I. 1986. Take A.I.M. at Productivity. . the paper was presented in Fifth World Productivity Congress in Jakarta, 14 April 1986 . Jakarta: The World Confederation of Productivity Sciences.

Scott, W.G. dan T.R. Mitchel. 1972. Organizations Theory. Illinois: Homewood, R.D. Irvin.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.