Model of Monitoring and Evaluation of Character Education at Universitas PGRI Semarang

Listyaning Sumardiyani, Fine Reffiane, Ngurah Ayu, Siti Lestari


Universitas PGRI Semarang has integrated character education into the fabric of its academic and non-academic activities. It has consciously set about creating a moral climate within university’s fourth pillar of Catur Dharma/ Modeling. Dynamic monitoring and evaluation system for character education is impetus in order to adequately meet the demands of recommended core values: personal and social awareness, self-management, and social skill.Though its slogan and core values are in the domain of character education, its monitoring, evaluation, and assessment have not integrated one and another yet.Thus, it is pertinent to conduct a research for desiging an effective model of monitoring and evaluation of character education.The study used three stages of R & D research method: desiging, revising,and field testing. Expert validation scores had gained 83.35 % while professional validation was 84.5%. It means the model both theoretically and practically is appropriate for evaluation of characters education. The results indicated that to be fully effective and ongoing of the program, integrated monitoring, measuring, and assessing system should be in conjunction with monitoring evaluation design, its implementation as well as its instruments. The study recommends the university and other institutions have to transfer this conceptual model into an implementation model in which character education functions harmonically and in a coordinated manner to provide effective and efficient results.


effective model; monitoring; evaluasion; character education

Full Text:



Ahmadi, Abu, dan Uhbiyati, Nur. 2015. Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Budimansyah, D, Ruyadi, Y, dan Rusmana, N. 2010. Model Pendidikan Karakter di Perguruan Tinggi. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Cherif, A., Overbye, D., and Stefurak, L. 2009. Developing a Paradigm for Academic Leadership Development. Journal of Higher Education Management. 24/1: 15-74.

Farida, Ida. 2014. Model Pendidikan karakter di Perguruan Tinggi: Langkah Strategis dan Implementasinya di Universitas. Jurnal Administratio. ISSN: 2087-0825. H. 445-452.

Hargreaves, R., J. 1997. In Defence of Reseach for Evidenced-Based Teaching: a Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersely. British Educational Reseach Journal. 23 : 405-420.

Kitchen, M., and Jeurissen, M. 2006. Teacher Reseach as Tesol Professional Development: a Case Study. New Zeeland Journal of Teachers’work. 3/1:33-41.

Marlow, M. 2004. Supporting Teacher Professional Identity through Mentoring Activities. Reseach in Higher Educational Journal. 2: 11-24.

Muqoyyidin. 2011. Pendidikan Karakter Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal JPP UM

Pelonis, P., Cherif, A., and King, L. 2009. Preparing High School Students for College Success: a College and High School Leadership Collaborative. Journal of Higher Education Management. 24/1: 68-77.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2010. Pembanguan Karakter Bangsa Thaun 2010-2025. Available in Accessed on 29 Mei 2015

LPPM. 2015. Rencana Strategis LPPM 2015-2019. Semarang: Universitas PGRI Semarang

Samani, Muchlas, & Hariyanto. 2012. Konsep dan Model Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung : Alfabeta.

Young, R. B., and Edwards, M. C. 2006. Importent Element of The Student Teaching Experience in Agricultural Education : A Comparison of Cooperatif Teachers and Student Teacher Perceptions. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Reseach. 56/1 : 89-100.

Zohar, T. 2002. Changing The Face of Teacher Education in Israel: Training Reflective Professional Teacher-a new Integrated Model. Journal of Teacher Education, Dilemma and Prospeect London Uk and USA. 251-262.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.