Email this article STUDY OF THE POTENTIAL ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM SALVINIA MOLESTA AND RICE STRAW
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to analyze the biogas production from co-digestion of Salvinia molesta and rice straw. Ratio of Salvinia molesta and rice straw was 5:0, 4:1, 3:2. Lab-scale-batch digesters (600 mL) were operated at room temperature (30 oC) and pressure of 1 atm. Total basis of Salvinia molesta and rice straw was 10 gr, water was added with ratio of organic matter:water = 1:7 (w/w), rumen fluid was added as inoculum, initial pH was adjusted to be 7. Fermentation process was conducted for 30 days. The results showed that total biogas volume for ratio of 5:0, 4:1, 3:2 was 6.30±0.00; 32.76±18.32; 107.54±18.51 mL/g VS respectively. The pH of substrate was changing from 7.00 to 6.77±0.19; 6.60±0.14; 6.73±0.09 for all variables respectively.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasi, S.A., Nipaney, P.C. 1984. Generation of biogas from Salvinia molesta (Mitchell) on a commercial biogas digester. Environ-mental Technology Letters. 5(1-11) : 75-80
Deublein, D., Steinhauser, A. 2008. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.
El-Mashad, H.M., Zeeman, G., van Loon, W.K.P., Bot, G.P.A., Lettinga, G. 2004. Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation onthermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresource Technology. 95 : 191–201.
Elbeshbishy, E., Nakhla, G. 2012. Batch anaerobic co-digestion of proteins and carbohydrates. Bioresource Technology. 116 : 170–178.
Hambali, E., Musdalipah, S., Halomoan, A.T., Pattiwiri, A.W., Hendroko, R. 2007. Teknologi Bioenergi, Jakarta: Agromedia.
Juanga, J.P., Visvanathan, C., Tränkler, J. 2007. Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Solid Waste in Combined Process and Sequential Staging. Journal of Waste Management Resources. 25 : 30–38.
Karellas, S.B. 2010. Development of an investment decision tool for biogas production from agricultural waste. Jurnal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14 : 1273-1282.
Mathew, A.K., Bhui, I., Banerjee, S.N., Goswani, R., Chakraborty, A.K., Shome, A., Balachandran, S., Chaudhury, S. 2014. Biogas Production from Locally Available Aquatic Weeds of Santiniketan through Anaerobic Digestion. Clean Technology Environmental Policy.
O-Thong, S. Boe, K., Angelidaki, I. 2012. Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production. Applied Energy. 93 : 648-654.
Paul, J. W., Beauchamp, E.G. 1989. Relationship between Volatile Fatty Acids, Total Ammonia, and pH in Manure Slurries. Biological Wastes. 29 : 313-318.
Soerjani, M., Koestermans, A.J.G.H., Tjitro-soepomo, G. 1987. Weed of Rice in Indonesia. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.
Sung, S., Liu, T. 2003. Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemo-sphere. 53(1) : 43–52.
Susan, S. 2003. Water Quality Education Specialist. University of Nevada Cooperative ektention. Nevada Department of Agriculture.
Syaichurrozi, I., Budiyono, Sumardiono, S. 2013. Predicting kinetic model of biogas production and biodegradability organic materials: Biogas production from vinasse at variation of COD/N ratio. Bioresource Technology. 149 : 390–397.
Syaichurrozi, I., Rusdi, R., Hidayat, T. Bustomi, A. 2016a. Kinetics Studies Impact of Initial pH and Addition of Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on Biogas Production from Tofu Wastewater in Indonesia. IJE TRANSACTIONS B: Applications. 29(8) : 1037-1046.
Syaichurrozi, I., Rusdi, Dwicahyanto, S., Toron, Y.S. 2016b. Biogas Production from Co-Digestion Vinasse Waste and Tofu-Processing Wastewater and Kinetics. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research. 6(3) : 1057-1070.
Yadvika, S., Sreekrishnan, T.R., Kohli, S., Ratna V. 2004. Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques- a review. Bioresource Technology. 95 : 1-10.
Zhen, G., Lu, X., Kobayashi, T., Li, Y.-Y., Xu, K., Zhao, Y. 2015. Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis. Applied Energy. 148 : 78-86.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
