Revealing the Meaning of Implementing the Tax Amnesty Program Through Phenomenology Approaches

Zahrotul Azizah

Abstract


The aim of this study is to explore the implementation of the tax amnesty program. This research was conducted on taxpayers, tax authorities, and tax consultants using the phenomenology approach. The type of data in this study is qualitative data, namely non-numeric data in the form of words that are able to describe information and phenomena. Qualitative data in the form of transcripts of the results of in-depth interviews arranged into a working paper and mapping table. The data validity procedure used in this study first triangulated the data source and returned the entire written narrative to the informants for examination. The informant consisted of 5 people consisting of taxpayers, tax authorities, and tax consultants in Malang City. The findings indicate that from the taxpayer’s side understanding, the tax amnesty program is as an opportunity to correct errors. From the side of the tax authorities understands, it is as a program that has not been carefully prepared based on various obstacles experienced by the tax authorities during the implementation of the program. The last, from the tax consultant’s side understanding, the tax amnesty program as a new beginning to raise tax awareness. The implication of this study is that the tax amnesty program as a fiscal policy has an impact on increasing taxpayer tax awareness but unfortunately this policy is not prepared properly so that the final results are still far from the set targets. This study can provide an evaluation of fiscal policies and improvements to the taxation system in the future so that it will have a positive impact on tax revenues.


References


Andreoni, James. 1991. The Desirable Of Permanent Tax Amnesty. Journal Of EconomicVol.45: 143-159. University Of Winconsin-Madison, USA.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013-2017. Data Penduduk Usia Produktif 2013-2017. Accessed at 30th January 2018, dari https://www.bps.go.id.

Bagiyada, I Made. 2016. Tax Amensty Upaya Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi V. Makasar.

Bisnis.liputan6.com. 2017. Tax Amnesty Jadi Tonggak Reformasi Perpajakan Di Indonesia. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/2886807/tax-amnesty-jadi-tonggak-reformasi-perpajakan-indonesia. Accessed at 1st February 2018.

Bisnis.tempo.co. 2017. Beberapa Penyebab Target Tax Amnesty Tak Tercapai.https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/861850/beberapa-penyebab-target-tax-amnesty-tak-tercapai. Accessed 15th February 2018.

Creswell W. John. 2013. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Darmayasa, I.N. 2016. Diskursus Tax Amnesty melalui RUU Pengampunan Nasional. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting. Vol 4: 111-120.

Harbiansyah, O. 2008. Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi. Mediator Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol 9 (1): 163-180.

Kamayanti, Ari. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi Pengantar Religiusitas Keilmuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.

Kusuma, Hendra. 2017. Tax Amensty Dianggap Gagal, Ini Pembelaan Ditjen Pajak. www.detik.com. Accessed at 21st Mei 2018.

Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjajaran, Perpustakaan Pusat UII.

Malherbe, Jacqueas. 2011. “Tax Amnestiesâ€. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Mangoting, Y. 2016. Domino Sebagai Konsep Kecurangan Pajak: Studi Fenomenologi. Disertasi. Program Doktor Ilmu Akuntansi. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.

Marchese C. 2014. “Tax Amnestyâ€, Iel Paper In Comparative Analysis Of Institutions, Economics And LawVol.17: 1-16.

Mattielo, G. 2005. Multiple Tax Amnesties and Tax Compliance (Forgiving Seventy Times Seven). Venezia Working Paper. Università Ca’Foscari.

Memon, Najeeb. 2015. Designing a Tax Amnesty – One Size Doesn’t Fit All. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin. Vol.21: 2-5.

Primadhyta, Safyra. 2017. CORE: Hasil Dari Tax Amnesty Jauh Dari Ekspektasi. www.cnnindonesia.com. Accessed at 22nd Mei 2018.

Said, Emmiryzan. 2016. Tax Policy In Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experienced Of The Republic Of Indonesia. Laws, 6(4): 16.

Saracoglu, Osman Fatih. Caskurlu, Eren. 2011. Tax Amnesty with Effects and Effecting Aspects: Tax Compliance, Tax Audits and Enforcements Around; The Turkish Case. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2:150-160.

Suryamalang.tribunnews.com. 2017. Hasil Pajak dari Tax Amnesty di Malang Raya Hampir 780 Miliar, Simak Datanya. http://suryamalang.tribunnews.com/2017/03/21/hasil-pajak-dari-tax-amnesty-malang-raya-hampir-780-miliar-simak-datanya. Accessed on March 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v10i2.16286

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License