Tax Based on Double Income Taxpayer Perspective

Muhammad Syafiq, Unti Ludigdo, M Achsin


This research is a case study approach. This research is a qualitative study using the interpretive paradigm. The data collection technique of this study used interviews with the Miles and Hubberman data analysis techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the point of view of the fairness of the tax amnesty policy of taxpayers with multiple incomes. Taxpayers with double income in question are employees who own a business as additional income. The informants from this study were employees of Civil Servants (PNS) who also owned businesses and employees of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) who also had businesses in addition to their main work. Tax amnesty is one form of complex Government reform. Pros and cons of tax amnesty are increasingly visible from the public response especially for those who feel they are victims of wrong targets. The results of this study show justice from the subjective point of view of obedient and non-compliant Taxpayers, subjective justice from the perspective of PNS and BUMN, and justice based on the objective side.


Keyword : Tax Amnesty, Taxpayers, Double Income, Case Studies.

Full Text:



Al-Quran dan Terjemahan. 2008. Departemen Agama RI. Bandung: Diponegoro.

Burrell, Gibson & Gareth Morgan. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of The Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Terj. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darmayasa, I. N., Sudarma, I. Made, Achsin, H.M, Mulawarman, Aji. D. (2017). Deconstruction of Tax Amnesty In Based On Pancasila Values: The Case of Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society. 25 (1).

Hartley, J. P. (1994). “Case Study in Organisational Research,” in Rahaman, A. S. and Lawrence, S. (2001) Public Sector Accounting and Financial Management in a Developing Country Organizational Context: A Three-Dimensional View, Paper presented at the Apira Conference. Juli 2001.

Malik S., et al. (1991). The Economics Of Tax Amnestyes. Journal of Public Economics, 46, 29-49

Michael, G & Louis, W. (1993). The Decision by Strategic Nonfilers to Participate in Income Tax Amnesties. International Rank of Law and Economics, 13, 27l-283.

Mouloud, Melikaoui. (2015). The Tax Amnesty Program: as Tool to Adjust the

Shadow Economy; the International Experiences. Journal of Economics

Accounting and Finance, 3 (2), 017-025.

Ralph, Harald, & Hammes. (2015). The Occurrence of tax amnesties: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 125, 70-82.

Sekaran, U. dan R. Bougie. (2010). Research Method for Business, A Skill Building Approach. Fifth Edition. John Willey & Son Inc. New York.

Setiawan. (2016). Fakta Ekonomi Indonesia Versi World Bank. Jakarta,

Indonesia. Diakses dari

Usman, H & Akbar, P. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License