Influence of Auditor Switching, Public Accounting Firm’s Reputation, and Workload on The Audit Quality with The Audit Committee’s Effec tiveness as The Moderating Variable

Sukirman Sukirman(1), Popi Asih(2),


(1) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to examine the influence of auditor switching, KAP reputation, and workload on the audit quality with the effectiveness of the audit committee as a moderating variable.

Method: This research uses the companies listed as LQ 45 on the IDX from 2016-2018. The data are processed using descriptive statistical and multiple linear analysis techniques with the absolute value difference test to examine the moderating variable

Findings: The results show that auditor switching and KAP reputation positively influence audit quality, while the workload and effectiveness of the audit committee do not. The effectiveness of the audit committee does not moderate the influence of the independent variables on the audit quality.

Novelty: This research is conducted from 2016 to 2018, where is a significant increase in stock offerings compared to the previous years. Furthermore, this research uses the effectiveness of the audit committee as a moderating variable

Keywords

Audit Quality; Auditor Switching; Public Accounting Firm’s Reputation; Workload; Audit Committee’s Effectiveness

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Hajaya, K. (2019). The Impact of Audit Committee Effectiveness on Audit Quality: Evidence from The Middle East. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.8341

Al-Khadash, N. A. M. (2013). Factors Affecting The Quality of Auditing : The Case of Jordanian Commercial Banks. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1), 206–222.

Al-Thuneibat, A. A., Al Issa, R. T. I., & Ata Baker, R. A. (2011). Do Audit Tenure and Firm Size Contribute to Audit Quality?: Empirical Evidence From Jordan. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111124648

Ardani, S. V. (2017). Pengaruh Tenure Audit, Rotasi Audit, Audit Fee Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2010-2014). Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 1–12.

Ardianingsih, A. (2014). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Lama Perikatan Audit dan Audit Capacity Stress Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi, 26(2), 77–94.

Atmojo, R. T., & Sukirman, S. (2019). Pengaruh Penguasaan, Audit Spesialisasi, dan KAP Reputasi terhadap Kualitas Audit Mediated oleh Komite Audit. Accounting Analysis Journal, 8(1), 66–73.

De Angelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(5), 183–199.

Edyatami, N. F. &, & Sukarmanto, E. (2020). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Audit Capacity Stress dan Komite Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Islam Bandung, 6(1), 199–202. http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/issue/view/5

El-Dyasty, M. M., & Elamer, A. A. (2020). The Effect of Auditor Type on Audit Quality in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. 28(4), 807-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2020-0060

Firth, M., Rui, O. M., & Wu, X. (2012). How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China. International Journal of Accounting, 47(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2011.12.006

Fitriyani, D., Prasetyo, E., Mirdah, A., & Putra, W. E. P. (2014). Pengaruh Manajemen Laba terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan dngan Kualitas Audit sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 6(11), 133–141.

Ghafran, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2017). The Impact of Audit Committee Expertise on Audit Quality: Evidence from UK Audit Fees. British Accounting Review, 49(6), 578–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.008

Giri, E. F. (2010). Pengaruh Tenur Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) dan Reputasi KAP terhadap Kualitas Audit : Kasus Rotasi Wajib Auditor di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 13. Purwokerto.

Hidayanti, F. O., & Sukirman. (2014). Reputasi Auditor, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Opini Audit tahun sebelumnya dalam Memprediksi Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern. Accounting Analysis Journal, 3(4), 420–428 https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v3i4.4199

Ishak, F. A. P., Perdana, H. D., & Widjajanto, A. (2015). Pengaruh Rotasi Audit, Workload dan Spesialisasi terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2009-2013. Jurnal Organisasi dan Manajemen, 11(2), 183–194.

Jayanti, N., & Widhiyani, N. (2014). Financial Distress dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Auditor Switching terhadap Audit Quality. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(3), 668–683.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602

Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.

Julia, S. E., Adam, M., & Tjandrakirana, R. (2019). The Influence of Audit Rotation, Audit Tenure and Workload on Audit Quality at Consumer Goods Sector Manufacturing Companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange. 3(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008439102580266

Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002

Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Audit Quality and The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Auditing, 22(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.109

Lopez, D. M., & Peters, G. F. (2011). Auditor Workload Compression and Busy Season Auditor Switching. Accounting Horizons, 25(2), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.2308/a

Nadia, N. F. (2015). J Pengaruh Tenur KAP, Reputasi KAP dan Rotasi KAP terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 13(26), 113–130.

Nurhayati, S., & Dwi, S. (2015). Pengaruh Rotasi KAP, Audit Tenure, dan Reputasi KAP terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 3(2), 165–174.

Rusli, T. J., & Wiratmaja, I. D. N. (2016). Komite Audit sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Workload dan Masa Perikatan Audit pada Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 11(1),47–53.

Safriliana,R., & Muawanah, S. (2019). Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Auditor Switching di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(1), 234-240. https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um004v5i32019p234

Safwan, Nadirsyah, & Abdullah, S. (2013). Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Pidie Jaya. Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 7(1), 133.

Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Obsorn, R. N. (2002). Organizational Behavior : Seventh Edition. John Wiley & Sons.

Setiami, N. D., & Solikhah, B. (2018). Public Accounting Firm Switching on the Companies Listed in IDX. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v9i1.12007

Setiawan, L., & Fitriany, F. (2011). Pengaruh Workload dan Spesialisasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Kualitas Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.03

Sihotang, Ruth M. E. (2014). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Switching." Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie, 2(4).

Soliman, M. M. (2014). Auditing Quality Characteristics and Accounting Conservatism: An Empirical Study of The Listed Companies In Egypt. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 11(2 D), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i2c3p4

Udayanti, N. K. S., & Ariyanto, D. (2017). Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Ukuran Perusahaan, Spesialisasi Industri KAP, dan Client Importance pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 20, 1073–1102. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2017.v20.i02.p08

Utami, H. T., & Diyanty, V. (2015). Pengaruh Entrenchment Effect terhadap Kualitas Audit dan Peran Efektivitas Komite Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol19.iss2.art5

Yan, H., & Xie, S. (2016). How Does Auditors’ Work Stress Affect Audit Quality? Empirical Evidence from The Chinese Stock Market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.001

Yanti, L., & Wijaya, M. D. W. (2020). Influence Of Auditor Switching, Audit Fee, Tenure Audit and Company Size To Audit Quality. ECo-Fin, 2(1), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v2i1.150

Yolanda, S., Arza, F. I., & Halmawati. (2019). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Komite Audit dan Audit Capacity Stress terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 1(2), 543–555.. http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/issue/view/5

Zgarni, I., Hlioui, K., & Zehri, F. (2016). Effective Audit Committee, Audit Quality, and Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 138–155 https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-09-2013-0048

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License