The Impact of Corporate Cultures and Financial Ratios on The Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Agung Prajanto, Ririh Dwi Pratiwi

Abstract


This study aims to examine and analyze financial statement fraud through financial ratios and corporate culture, case study of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Year 2006-2010. The research was conducted at the companies included in the sanctions issued by Capital Markets Supervisory Board (Bapepam) in the period 2006-2010 for companies that committed fraud. While for the companies that did not do fraud, sample was obtained randomly by same asset and industry size. Testing was conducted by using logistic regression to determine the effect of financial ratios and corporate culture on financial statements fraud. Results of research conducted using logistic regression showed that liquidity ratio had positive effect on fraudulent financial statements. While the ratio of gross profit margin and capital turnover indicated a negative impact on financial reporting fraud. Variable of corporate culture was proxied by special relationship transaction, the composition of the founders in board of directors and directors who titled accountant did not effect on fraudulent financial statements.


Keywords


financial statements; fraud; financial ratio; corporate culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albrecht W.Steve and Albrecht Chad O., 2002 . “Fraud Examination. Thomson South- Western.

Artikel BPKP. Fraud (Kecurangan): Apa dan Mengapa? Sie Infokum – Ditama Binbangkum.

Amrizal, 2004. Pencegahan dan Pendeteksian Kecurangan Oleh Internal Auditor. Jakarta. accessed 13th April 2011

Bapepam. Siaran Pers Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal 2006-2010. Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal.

Beasly et.al, COSO. 2010. Fraudulent Financial Reporting 1998-2007, An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. Commitee of Sponsoring Organization of The Treadway Commission (COSO).

Budi Santosa, Purbayu and Ashari. 2005. Analisis Statistif dengan Microsoft Excel dan SPSS. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset

Geriesh, Lofti. 2003. Organization Culture and Fraudulent Financial Reporting”. Nova South Eastern University

Ghozali, Imam, 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS.Semarang. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Guan, Liming et.al. 2008. Can Investors Detect Fraudusing Financial Statements: An Exploratory Study. Public Interest Accounting,Volume13,17–34

Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) 2006 - 2010. BEI Information Center

Jogiyanto, 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Yogyakarta, BPFE

Juniarti and Corolina, 2005. Analisa Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Perataan Laba (Income Smoothing) Pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan Go Public. Jurnal akuntansi & keuangan, vol. 7, no. 2, nopember 2005: 148-162

Kurniawati, Ema. 2011. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement Fraud dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Kaminzki et.al. 2004. Can financial ratios detect Fraudulent financial reporting?. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol.19No.1,2004 pp.15-28

Koroy, Tri Ramaraya. n.d. Pendeteksian Kecurangan (Fraud) Laporan

Keuangan oleh Auditor Eksternal. STIE Nasional Banjarmasin.

Leosinga, Ruslan. 2011. Artikel Budaya Organisasi. diakses tanggal 10 Agustus 2012.

Lou and Wang. 2009. Fraud Risk Factor Of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research – February, 2009 Volume 7, Number 2

Mandasari, Laras. 2011. Faktor Transaksi dengan Pihak Istimewa, Financial Leverage, Strategi Akuisisi dan Auditor Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi (Studi Pada Perusahan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta.

Molida, Resti. 2011. Pengaruh Financial Stability, Personal Financial Need Dan Ineffective Monitoring Pada Financial Statement Fraud Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang

Mukhlasin. 2007. Determinan Ekonomi Pemilihan Kebijakan Akuntansi: Analisis Single Motive dan Multiple Motive Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di

Bursa Efek Jakarta. Disertasi. Program Pasca Sarjana Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi-Konsentrasi Akuntansi. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang

Norbarani, Listiana. 2012. Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle yang diadopsi dalam SAS No.99. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Persons,O.S. 1995,“Using financial statement data to identify factors associated with fraudulent financial reporting” Journal of Applied

Business Researc,Vol.11No.3,pp.38-46

Purwanti, Yulia.2005. Analisis Rasio Keuangan dalam Memprediksi Kondisi Keuangan Financial Distress Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Islam Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

Skousen, et.al, 2009. Detecting And Predicting Financial Statement Fraud:The Effectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle And Sas No.99. Emerald Journal Volume13,53–81.

Spathis T, Charlambos. 2002. Detecting False Financial Statements using published data: Some Evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal 17 179-191.

Rangga Soselisa, and Mukhlasin, 2008. Pengaruh Faktor Kultur Organisasi, Manajemen, Strategik, Keuangan, dan Auditor Terhadap

Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi: Studi Pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta.

Stanny Gagola, Antonius, 2011. Analisis Resiko Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Burse Efek Indonesia. Tesis. Program Pasca Sarjana Magister Sains Akuntansi, Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Sukartha, Made. 2007. Pengaruh Manajemen Laba, Kepemilikan Manajerial, dan

Ukuran Perusahaan pada Kesejahteraan Pemegang Saham Perusahaan Target Akuisisi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2007 . P. 243-267

Tuanakota M., Theodorus. 2007. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Seri Departemen Akuntansi FE UI.

Thornhill,W.T. 1995, Forensic Accounting–How to Investigate Financial Fraud, Richard. Irwin, NewYork, NY.

Uma Sekaran, 2000, Research Methods For Business, 4th Ed, Book 1, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wilopo. 2006. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi”. STIE Perbanas.

Wilardjo, Liek 2011. Catatan Teori Organisasi dan Manajemen (Teori Institusional). Blog.at wordpress.com accessed. 29 Februari 2012




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v8i1.9120

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License