The Effect of Internal Control Factors on the Accountability of the Auditor at the Inspectirate of Jombang District

Ludfa Febriana, Siti Maria Wardayati, Whedy Prasetyo


Government Regulation Number 60 of 2008 on Government Internal Control System is a manifestation of government commitment in order to improve the performance, transparency and accountability of state finance management and to clarify the role of internal control. This study aims at testing and analyzing the influence of internal control factors to auditors who work in the inspectorate of Jombang District. The population in this study are all auditors working in Jombang inspectorate which amounted to 35 auditors. The research sampling uses census method with unit of analysis as many as 35 auditors at Inspectorate of Jombang District. The type of this research is quantitative research using multivariate statistical analysis by using multiple regression analysis. The tests used are validity, reliability, and hypothesis testing. The result of the research proves that controll environment, management risk assessment, activity control, communication and information, and monitoring affect on auditor accountability in the Inspectorate of Jombang District. Based on the results and discussion of the research, the conclusion that can be taken is the auditor at the Inspectorate of Jombang District should pay attention and keep the compliance of internal control because it will make auditor accountability awake.


Control Environment; Risk Assessment; Activity Control; Information and Communication; Monitoring; Accountability

Full Text:



Agbejule, A., & Jokipii, A. (2009). Strategy, control activities, monitoring and effectiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(6), 500–522.

Al-Thuneibat, A. A., Al-Rehaily, A. S., & Basodan, Y. A. (2015). The impact of internal control requirements on profitability of Saudi shareholding companies. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(2), 196–217.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services. England: Pearson Education.

Corici, M. (2009). The impact of the information and communication technology as a factor of influence on organizational performance. Journal of Social Information, 6(12), 22–42.

COSO. (2013). Internal Control — Integrated Framework Executive Summary. Retrieved from

de Zwaan, L., Stewart, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2011). Internal audit involvement in enterprise risk management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(7), 586–604.

Dewi, S. P. (2012). Pengaruh pengendalian internal dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja karyawan SPBU Yogyakarta (studi kasus pada spbu anak cabang perusahaan RB. Group). Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 1(1), 1–22.

Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Arens, A. A., & Jusuf, A. A. (2013). Jasa Audit & Assurance: Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Jones, M. J. (2008). Internal control, accountability and corporate governance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 1052–1075.

Kaltsum, U., & Rohman, A. (2014). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Melalui Sistem Pengendalian Intern Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kota Salatiga). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(1), 215–228.

Karanja, E. (2017). Does the hiring of chief risk officers align with the COSO/ISO enterprise risk management frameworks? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(3), 274–295.

Kiabel, B. D. (2012). Internal auditing and performance of government enterprises: a Nigerian study. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(6), 1–20.

Koutoupis, A. G. (2012). Importing international corporate governance codes in Greek publicly listed enterprises: A case study analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 20(4), 447–463.

Mardiasmo. (2009). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (IV). Yokyakarta: Andi.

Petrakaki, D., Hayes, N., & Introna, L. (2009). Narrowing down accountability through performance monitoring technology. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 6(3), 160–179.

Pujiswara, I. B., Herawati, N. T., & Sinarwati, N. K. (2014). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah dan Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah terhadap Nilai Informasi Pelaporan Keuangan dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah di Kabupaten Klungkung). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi S1), 2(1), 1–12.

Rae, K., & Subramaniam, N. (2008). Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(2), 104–124.

Rama, D. V, & Jones, F. L. (2008). Sistem Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Rendon, J. M., & Rendon, R. G. (2016). Procurement fraud in the US Department of Defense: Implications for contracting processes and internal controls. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6/7), 748–767.

Santoso, E. B. (2016). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah, Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia terhadap Akuntabilitas Keuangan Daerah (Studi Empiris pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Lampung Timur).

Santoso, U., & Pambelum, Y. J. (2008). Pengaruh Penerapan Akuntansi Sektor Publik Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dalam Mencegah Fraud. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 4(1), 14–33.

Spillan, J. E., & Ziemnowicz, C. (2011). Who is in charge? Cases of not managing internal controls in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Business, Society & Government, 3(1), 4–20.

Tauringana, V., & Mangena, M. (Eds.). (2012). Accounting in Africa (Vol. 12). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Wardayati, S. M., & Arif, A. (2017). The Influence of Individual Rank, Work Experience, and Firm Size, On the Professionalism and Output of Internal Auditor. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S1), 141–154.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License