Model Peningkatan Kinerja Inovatif dalam Konteks Teknologi Informasi

Bambang Setyo Utomo, Widodo -

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menyusun model dalam peningkatan kinerja inovatif, sehingga dapat meningkatkan kualitas  hasil pendidikan dan daya saing bangsa, yang berbasis profesionalisme dalam konteks Teknologi Informasi. Responden adalah guru SMA Negeri  di Kabupaten  Jepara yang berjumlah 300 guru yang terdiri dari 125 guru yang telah mendapatkan sertifikasi dan 175  guru yang belum sertifikasi. Teknik analisis menggunakan The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) dari paket software AMOS 5.0 .Model estimasi Maximum Likelihood (ML) besarnya sampel 100-200. Mengacu pada pendapat tersebut maka jumlah sampel 120. Temuan studi menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan  guru yang belum dan telah  bersertifikasi kinerja inovatif guru. Kemudian  dalam konteks adaptabilitas teknologi informasi rendah ada pengaruh sertifikasi terhadap profesionalisme dan profesionalisme terhadap kinerja inovatif. Namun tidak ada pengaruh  sertifikasi terhadap kinerja inovasi guru. Hasil studi ini di harapkan untuk dapat meningkatkan kinerja inovatif  guru melalui konteks adaptasi teknologi informasi.


This research aims to establish the model of innovative performance improvemnet toward education result quality refinement and competitive advantage of the nation which is based on professionalism in Information Technology. The samples are taken from 300 teachers of Senior High School State-Owned in Jepara Regency, whic is consist of 125 sertified teahcers and 175 unsertified teahers. The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) is used to analyse the data, with samples estimated model Maximum Likelihood (ML) is 100 – 200 which lead to the number of sampleis 120. The result shows there is no difference between sertified and unsertified theachers toward profesionalism and information technology adaptibility and profesionalism toward innovative performance. This study achieves to increase teacher performance by using adapted information technology context.

Keywords

Innovative Performance; Professionalism; Certification; Information Technology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Chugtai & Zafar. 2008. Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment Among Pakistani University Theachers. Journal Applied HRM Research. Vol. 11, No. 1.

Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan. 2008. Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Direktoral Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Ferdinand, A. T. 2006. Structural Equation Modelling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Freeman, C. 1991. Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Journal Research Policy. Vol. 20, pp: 499-514.

Goldstein, J. 2009. Designing Transparent Teacher Evaluation: The Role of Oversight Panels for Professional Accountability. Teachers College Record. Vol. 111, No. 4, pp: 893-933.

Hoang, H. A & Frank T. R. 2010. Leveraging Internal and External Experience: Exploration, Exploitation, and R&D Project Performance. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 31, pp: 734–758.

Korpelainen, E. K & Mari. 2010. Employees’ Choices in Learning how to Use Information and Communication Technology Systems at Work: Strategies and Approaches. International Journal of Training & Development. Vol. 14, No. 22, pp: 32-53.

Linlin, J & Haifa, S. 2010. The Effect of Researchers’Interdisciplinary Characteristics on Team Innovation Performance: Evidence from University R&D Teams in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.Vol. 21, No. 13.

Mamaghani, F. 2010. The Social and Economic Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Developing Countries: An Analysis. International Journal of Management.Vol. 27, No. 9, pp: 607-615.

Muammer, Z & Selcuk, B. H. 2008. Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance:Empirical Evidence in the Turkish Automotive Supplier. Journal of Technology Management Innovation. Vol. 3, No. 4.

Phelps, C. C. 2010. A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 53, pp: 890-913.

Safdar, M. 2008. Role of Information Technologies in Teaching Learning Process: Perception of the Faculty. Journal of Distance Education. Vol. 9, No. 2.

Samani, M., Maschab, M & Moenta, A. P. 2010. Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan Tahun 2010. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Saudagar & Idrus, A. 2009. Pengembangan Profesionalitas Guru. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.

Sharma & Arogan-Corera. 2008. Enviroment, Structure and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conseptual Integration. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 12, No. 2, pp: 313-324.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 18, No. 7, pp: 509-533.

Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Winastawan, G. S & Sunarto. 2010. Strategi dan Model Integrasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK). Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Zajac, E. J & Changhui. 2009. Control, Collaboration and Productivity in International Joint Ventures: Theory and Evidence. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 30, No. 8, pp: 865-884.

Zehir, C., Yilmaz, E & Velioglue, H. 2008. The Impac of Informatin Technology Practices and Organization Learning on Firm Innovation and Performance. Journal of Global Management. Vol. 4.


View Counter: Abstract - 828 and PDF - 476

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.