Connectivity Between Pedestrian Ways and BRT Shelter in Banyumanik and Pedurungan, Semarang

Diah Intan Dewi(1), Anita Ratnasari Rakhmatulloh(2),


(1) Diponegoro University
(2) Diponegoro University

Abstract

The increasing number of human activities from sub urban areas causes high movements in urban areas. The high rate of human movement drives the need for human circulation pathways and adequate transportation systems. To solve this problem, the Semarang City government has actually built transportation facilities in the form of BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) along with pedestrian ways. However, in reality the pedestrian ways that acts as a link to the door to door service is not well connected so it is less secure and comfortable and unable to accommodate the needs of the urban community. The purpose of this study was to examine the connectivity between pedestrian networks and BRT shelter in Semarang. The method of analysis in this study used GIS applications to evaluate access pedestrian connectivity to BRT shelther in Banyumanik and Pedurungan, Semarang. The results of the study are the connectivity between pedestrian ways and BRT shelter  in Banyumanik is good on the other side the connectivity in Pedurungan is not good and optimally configured

Keywords

connectivity, pedestrian ways, BRT shelter

Full Text:

PDF

References

REFERENCES

A. Ozbila, J. Peponisb and B. Stoneb. “Understanding The Link between Street Connectivity, Land Use and Pedestrian Flowsâ€. URBAN DESIGN International, Vol. 16 (2), Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 1357-5317. 2011 pp. 125–141

P. Naess, “Accessibility, Activity Participation and Location of Activities: Exploring between Residential Location and Travel Behaviourâ€. Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2006.

P. Næss, “Residential Self-Selection and Appropriate Control Variables in Land Use: Travel Studiesâ€, Transport Reviews, 29(3), 2009.

D.I.K. Dewi, A.R. Rakhmatulloh, P. Anggraini, “Mapping Between Bus Rapid Transit Shelter and High School Location in Semarangâ€, 2nd Geoplanning-Internasional Conference on Geomatics and Planning, IOP. Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science123, 2018.

A.R. Rakhmatulloh, I. Buchori, W. Pradoto, and B. Riyanto, “What is The Role of Land Value in The Urban Corridor?â€, 2nd Geoplanning-Internasional Conference on Geomatics and Planning, IOP. Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science123, 2018.

A. W. Agrawal, M. Schlossberg and K. Irvin, “How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preferenceâ€, Journal of Urban Design, Vol.13, No.1, 2008, pp. 81-98.

R. Schneider, “Walk or Drive between Stores? Designing Neighborhood Shopping Districts for Pedestrian Activityâ€, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, pp. 212–229.

M. Nikolopoulou, K. Martin and B. Dalton, “Shaping Pedestrian Movement through Playful Interventions in Security Planning: What do Field Surveys Suggest?â€, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 21, No.1, 2016, pp. 84-104.

J. B. Zook, et al, “Design and pedestrianism in a smart growth developmentâ€, Environment and Behavior, Vol 44, No. 2, 2012, pp. 216–234, doi: 10.1177/0013916511402060.

J. Zheng, et al, "Spatial characteristics of walking areas for pedestrian navigation", 3rd International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, MUE, 2009, pp. 452–458. doi: 10.1109/MUE.2009.80.

BPS, Kota Semarang dalam Angka Tahun 2015, Kantor Statistik Jawa Tengah, 2015

The Government Regulation No. 43 Year 1993 about ‘Utilities and Traffic Road’

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.