Model of Base Saturation Flow to Improve Indonesia Highway Capacity Manual at Signalized Intersection
(1) Universitas Diponegoro
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Universitas Diponegoro
Abstract
The intersection is a significant part of the urban traffic network. One of the problems of signalized intersections is the results of an analysis that do not match the field. For the analysis of signalized border crossings in 1997 Indonesia, the Indonesia Highway Capacity Manual, a product of the 1994 data processing, was used. Traffic conditions in 1994 were, of course, different from traffic conditions today. Given the significant changes related to traffic, such as increases in the number of vehicles, land use, behavior, road geometry, and technical complexity, the 1997 IHCM needed to be improved according to the current situation. One quantity in IHCM is base saturation flow or So, which is an essential parameter in signalized intersection analysis. Base saturation flow (So) in 1997 IHCM is 600 x We. After modeling and chi-variance test of ρ value ˂0.05 in the range 675 x We to 1000 x We^85, the result is So, which is the result of the queue length approximation field is 1000 x We.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
W. Yue, C. Li, Y. Chen, P. Duan, and G. Mao, “What is the Root Cause of Congestion in Urban Traffic Networks: Road Infrastructure or Signal Control?,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 8662–8679, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3085021.
M. A. Basmassi, S. Boudaakat, J. A. Chentoufi, and L. Benameur, “Evolutionary reinforcement learning multi-agents system for intelligent traffic light control : new approach and case of study,” vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 5519–5530, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i5.pp5519-5530.
X. J. Liang, S. I. Guler, and V. V Gayah, “An equitable traffic signal control scheme at isolated signalized intersections using Connected Vehicle technology,” Transp. Res. Part C, vol. 110, no. November 2019, pp. 81–97, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.005.
S. Sugiarto, F. Apriandy, Y. Darma, S. M. Saleh, M. Rusdi, and T. Miwa, “Determining passenger car equivalent (PCEs) for pretimed signalized intersections with severe motorcycle composition using Bayesian linear regression,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 9, p. e0256620, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256620.
P. Di, M. Id, G. Fusco, and A. R. Id, “Geometrical and Functional Criteria as a Methodological Approach to Implement a New Cycle Path in an Existing Urban Road Network : A Case Study in Rome,” 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10082951.
I. M. I. Ramadan, M. S. Abdel-monem, and O. H. Ahmed, “Selection Of Intersection Control Type In Urban Areas,” vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 164–173, 2022, doi: 10.2478/cee-2022-0015.
E. Barmpounakis and N. Geroliminis, “On the new era of urban traffic monitoring with massive drone data: The pNEUMA large-scale field experiment,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 111, no. November 2019, pp. 50–71, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.023.
L. Li, R. Jiang, Z. He, X. (Michael) Chen, and X. Zhou, “Trajectory data-based traffic flow studies: A revisit,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 114, no. February, pp. 225–240, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.016.
L. Xia, P. Li, Z. Su, T. Chen, Z. Deng, and D. Sun, “Longitudinal Driving Behavior before , during , and after a Left-Turn Movement at Signalized Intersections : A Naturalistic Driving Study in China,” 2022.
A. Khadhir, A. Bhaskar, L. Vanajakshi, and M. Haque, “Development of a Theoretical Delay Model for Heterogeneous and Less Lane-Disciplined Traffic Conditions,” vol. 2022, 2022.
X. Zhang, J. Sun, X. Qi, and J. Sun, “Simultaneous modeling of car-following and lane-changing behaviors using deep learning,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 104, no. May, pp. 287–304, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.021.
D. F. Xie, Z. Z. Fang, B. Jia, and Z. He, “A data-driven lane-changing model based on deep learning,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 106, no. June, pp. 41–60, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.07.002.
I. M. Kariyana, P. A. Suthanaya, D. M. P. Wedagama, and I. M. A. Ariawan, “The Saturated Flow Modeling on Motorcycle Behavior Based on Through Movements at Signalized Intersections,” vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1189–1197, 2021, doi: 10.13189/cea.2021.090420.
D. Muley, “E ff ect of U-Turns and Heavy Vehicles on the Saturation Flow Rates of Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections,” 2020.
L. Wang, Y. Wang, and Y. Bie, “Automatic Estimation Method for Intersection Saturation Flow Rate Based on Video Detector Data,” vol. 2018, 2018.
J. Xu, K. K. Kigen, D. Xu, S. Wang, M. Gu, and X. Liu, “Saturation flow rate analysis for special width approach lanes : An empirical study in,” pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272503.
H. Qi and X. Hu, “Real-time headway state identification and saturation flow rate estimation: a hidden Markov Chain model,” Transp. A Transp. Sci., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 840–864, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23249935.2020.1722285.
Y. S. Murat and M. Cetin, “A New Perspective for Saturation Flows at Signalized Intersections,” Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 296–307, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3311/PPci.11344.
A. Saha, “Delay in Oversaturated Flow Condition at Signal Controlled Intersection under Heterogeneous Traffic Scenario,” no. 87, 2022.
N. Hidayati, R. R. Harimanana, S. Sunarjono, H. Dhia, and A. Ghalib, “Bottleneck Effect Caused by Motorcyclist Presence in the Traffic Flow on Kerten Signalized Intersection,” vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2338–2351, 2022, doi: 10.13189/cea.2022.100609.
M. M. Rahman, P. Najaf, M. G. Fields, and J. C. Thill, “Traffic congestion and its urban scale factors: Empirical evidence from American urban areas,” Int. J. Sustain. Transp., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 406–421, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15568318.2021.1885085.
R. M. Savithramma, R. Sumathi, and H. S. Sudhira, “A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in Design Process of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2161, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2161/1/012054.
J. Sonnleitner, M. Friedrich, and E. Richter, “Impacts of highly automated vehicles on travel demand: macroscopic modeling methods and some results,” Transportation (Amst)., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 927–950, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10199-z.
M. N. Azadani and A. Boukerche, “Driving Behavior Analysis Guidelines for,” pp. 1–19, 2021.
M. Parseh and F. Asplund, “New needs to consider during accident analysis: Implications of autonomous vehicles with collision reconfiguration systems,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 173, no. May, p. 106704, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106704.
G. Balletto, M. Ladu, A. Milesi, F. Camerin, and G. Borruso, “Walkable City and Military Enclaves: Analysis and Decision-Making Approach to Support the Proximity Connection in Urban Regeneration,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010457.
E. McDermot, D. Agdas, C. R. Rodríguez Díaz, T. Rose, and E. Forcael, “Improving performance of infrastructure projects in developing countries: an Ecuadorian case study,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2469–2483, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1797985.
Y. Song, P. Wu, D. Gilmore, and Q. Li, “A Spatial Heterogeneity-Based Segmentation Model for Analyzing Road Deterioration Network Data in Multi-Scale Infrastructure Systems,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7073–7083, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3001193.
S. E. Bibri and J. Krogstie, “Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 31, pp. 183–212, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
