Conflicts Of Land Confiscationis In Sogo Village: Community Versus PT.Bukit Bintang Sawit (WILMAR)

Irwan irwan(1), Afrizal Afrizal(2), Zusmelia Zusmelia(3), Maihasni Maihasni(4),


(1) STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat-Padang
(2) Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Andalas
(3) Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat
(4) Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Andalas

Abstract

Conflicts of land confiscationis one of the land tenure problem in urban and rural areas of Indonesia. Conflicts that occurred came from the capitalism that has entered in various regions with the aim to gain benefits both individually and in groups. This study is to looks at the chronology of the conflict, the actors and the type of people political movements of their lands that have been excluded from theydaily livelihood resources. Partnership system built by PT. BBS (PT.BukitBintangSawit) resulted in changes to the access of land or agrarian resources. Land that originally as a source of community life  andexperienced a process of power transfer from community to company PT. Bukit BintangSawit.The research method is a comparative with expost facto approach. The data analysis was done in the form of literature study, resume result from Antoni and field result of year 2016 in order to understand the theory related to phenomenon. Data analysis is the view of experts who are studying the conflict on access theory purposed by Jess C. Ribot and Nancy Lee Peluso, while the conflict theory was using Fisher et.al. and theory of property rights from Schlager and Ostrom (1992). The results of the study indicate that the type of political movement performed the type of official politics and the conflict between local communities with PT BBS. Their movement is aim to reclaim their natural resources. Then the type of everyday politics related to the opposition openly to reject the operation of oil palm plantation companies in the area of Sago Village and ask for compensation related to the land they have seized. In addition, the actor in the case consists of three people who have economic capital, holders and makers and recognize property rights and government policy makers.

Keywords

Land Conflict, Local Community, Government

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Ananta, Dicky Dwi. 2016. Politik Oligarki dan Perampasan Tanah di Indonesia: Kasus Perampasan Tanah di Kabupaten Karawang Tahun 2014. Jurnal Politik, Vol. 2, No. 1. hal 105-106.

Adnan, S. 2007. Departures from everyday resistance and flexible strategies of domination: the making and unmaking of a poor peasant mobilisation in Bangladesh. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(2), 183–224.

Adit, N.D. 1964. Kaum Tani Mengganjang Setan-setan Desa: Laporan Singkat Tentang Hasil Riset Mengeni Kedaan Kaum Tani dan Gerakan Sosial Tanji Djawa Barat. Jakarta: Jajasan Pembaruan Djakarta.

Antoni. 2016. Resume Laporan Sengeketa Tanah Desa Sago Kecamatan Kumpeh Iiir Kabupaten Muaro Jambi.

Borras Jr, Saturnino M., Cristobal Kay, Sergio Gomes dan John Wil¬kinson. 2012. Land Grabbing and Global Capitalist Accumulation: Key Features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies. No. 4. hal 402-416.

Borras JR, Saturnino, M. 2009. Agrarian Change And Peasant Studies: Changes, Continuities And Challenges-An Introduction. Journal Of Peasant Studies, Vol. 36; No. 1; hal. 5 -31; DOI: 10.1080/03066150902820297.

Fisher S. et.al. 2000. Mengelolah Konflik: Keterampilan dan Strategi untuk Bertindak. Jakarta: The British Council.

Gwynne, R. and C. Kay. 2004. Latin America Transformed: Globalisation and modernity, Second Edition. London: Arnold.

Levien, Michael. 2012. The Land Question: Special Economic Zones and the Political Economy of Dispossession in India. Journal of Peasant Studies., No. 3-4, hal 933-969.

Lord, H.G. 1973. Expost Facto Studise as A Research Method. New York: Syracuse City School District.

Le Mons Walker, K. 2008. From covert to overt: everyday peasant politics in China and the implications for transnational agrarian movements. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2–3), 462–88.

Ribot JC, Peluso NL. 2003. A theory Of Access. Rural Sociology Society 68 (2). 153-181.

Schlager E, dan Ostrom E. 1992. Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3): 249-262.

Wahyu, H. 2015. Mengurai Konflik Perebutan Tanah (Adat) di Daerah Lahan-Basah Kabupaten Banjar. Prosiding Universitas Lambung Mangkurat 2015 Potensi, Peluang, dan Tantangan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Lahan-Basah Secara Berkelanjutan. Lampung: Lambung Mangkurat University Press D/A Pusat Pengelolaan Dan Penerbitan Jurnal Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.

White, Ben dkk. 2015. Teh New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives On Corporate Land Deals. The Journal Of Studies Peasant, No. 39, Nos. 3-4, Hal. 619-647. DOI: 10,1080/03066150.2012.691879.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.