Evaluation of the National Urban Community Empowerment Program

Suparno Suparno

Abstract

The main problem in this study is the low level of community participation in the implementation of National Urban Community Empowerment Program (NUCEP) in Grobogan Regency. This can be seen from the lack of community involvement in the entire process of the activity stage. The purpose of this study was to find out how the level of community participation in the implementation of NUCEP in Grobogan Regency. This research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data analysis used qualitative and tirangulasi data analysis techniques. The evaluation model used is the Context, Input, Process and Product. The evaluation results show that the implementation of NUCEP is good, the context of the implementation of NUCEP is good, the input of NUCEP is good, but the available funds are insufficient to meet community needs; the implementation process went well, at the stage of preparation for less community participation especially in the FGD on Reflections on Poverty and the Preparation of Medium-Term Planning for Poverty Reduction Programs; then the implementation of the activities went well and the products of the NUCEP activities in the form of physical activities benefited the community. Based on the evaluation results it is recommended that, the effectiveness of NUCEP  needs to be increased, the NUCEP District apparatus must be more democratic and participatory in the implementation of planned programs. Community involvement must always be encouraged in all processes and stages of activities, starting from planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and in the preparation of reporting for each activity.

Keywords

policy evaluation; poverty reduction; program evaluation

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Ahmadi, A. and Wiyanti, D. T. (2014) ‘Implementasi Weighted Product ( WP ) dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Masyarakat PNPM Mandiri Perdesaan’, in Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI), pp. 19–22.

Alffitri, R. (2014) ‘Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat ( PNPM ) Mandiri Perkotaan’, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2(2).

Arikunto, S. and Jabar, C. S. A. (2009) Metode Evaluasi Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: Bina Aksara.

Bancin, M. H. (2011) ‘Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Perdesaan (Studi Kasus: Bandung Barat)’, Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 22(3), pp. 179–194.

Chrystanti, yulanita cahya and Wardati, I. ulli (2011) ‘Sistem Pengolahan Data Simpan Pinjam khusus Perempuan (SPP) Pada Unit Pengelola Kegiatan (UPK) Mitra Usaha Mandiri Program Nasional Pemberdayan Masyarakat Mandiri Perdesaan (PNPM-MPd) Kecamatan Pringkuku Kabupaten Pacitan Yulanita Cahya Chrystanti, Indah’, Joural Speed-Sentra Penelitian Engineering dan Edukasi, 3(1), p. 61.

Hadi, A. R., Effendi, I. and Hasanudin, T. (2013) ‘Peranann Kader pemberdayaan masyarakat Desa (KPMD) dan partisipasi masyarakat pada program nasional pemberdayaan masyarakat mandiri pedesaan (PNPM-MP) di Kecamatan Wonosobo Kab. Tanggamus’, Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 1(1), pp. 66–72.

Mubarak, Z. (2010) Evaluasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Proses Pengembangan Kapasitas dapa Kegiatan PNPM Mandiri Perkotaan, Thesis Magister Teknik Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota UNDIP, Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro. Available at: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/23734/.

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2011) Evaluasi Program Pembangunan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Nihayah, A. Z. (2015) ‘Pengaruh Program Simpan Pinjam Kelompok Perempuan terhadap Pendapatan Saha Mikro Kecil dan Poverty Reduction dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam’, Economic: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), pp. 1–24.

Ningrum, H. A. (2014) ‘Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri’, eJournal Sosiologi, 2(3), pp. 1–24.

Northwest Center for Public Health Practice University of Washington (2017) Six Steps of Program Evaluation.

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W. and Henry, G. T. (2018) Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage publications.

Suharsimi, A. (1993) ‘Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta: PT’, Rineka Cipta.

Surya, S. (2011) ‘Analisis Kinerja Dana Bergulir PNPM Mandiri di Kecamatan Lubuk Begalung Kota Padang’, Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 7(2), pp. 101–117. Available at: http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/JurnalAdministrasiBisnis/article/viewFile/406/390.

The World Bank Indonesia (2008) Impact Evaluation of the Second Phase of the Kecamatan Development Program in Indonesia. Jakarta: The World Bank Indonesia.

University of Washington (2017) Evaluation Services for Public Health, University of Washington. Available at: https://www.nwcphp.org/communications/news/nwcphp-to-evaluate-new-program-targeting-pediatric-mental-health.

Widiyanto, Suryono and Retno, K. (2017) Sistem Informasi Pengukuran Kinerja Unit Pengembang Jurnal dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Universitas Diponegoro. Available at: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/56102/.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.