The Existence of Gampong in the Middle of Changing Community

Mahmuddin Mahmuddin(1), Laura M Kolopaking(2), Rilus A Kinseng(3), Sadu Wasistiono(4), Saharuddin Saharuddin(5),


(1) Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Lampung
(2) Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University
(3) Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University
(4) Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University
(5) Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University

Abstract

The passage of Act No. 18, 2001 on regional autonomy and followed up with the issuance of Qanun No. 4, 2003 on mukim, and Qanun No. 5, 2003 on gampong and reinforced by UUPA No. 11, 2006 on Acehnese government is a history of social identity of Acehnese society, which has been neglected during the conflict. The regional government has made some breakthroughs and one of the breakthroughs was gampong revitalization through a program called “back to gampong”. The study aims to answer the dynamic of revitalization of gampong institution in the middle of special autonomy implementation and the implementation of Qanun gampong in the administration of gampong institution. The study shows that the implementation of program “back to gampong” encourages the strengthening process of gampong institution as well as weakens the institution itself. The development of gampong that focuses on physical aspect has created coordination gap among officials of gampong institution in planning system and financial management.  The tug in the mechanism of financial development and management at gampong has created a space for the involvement and influence from gampong elite in gampong governance. Non-uniform honorary allocation for gampong governmental apparatus is one of indicators of weak role and function of gampong cultural institution because the previous inherent communal values have been calculated economically.

Keywords

revitalization; Gampong institution; back to Gampong

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Alfian. 1988. Kelompok Elit dan Hubungan Sosial di Pedesaan. Jakarta: Grafiti Kita.

Abddulah, H. 1976. Struktur Sosial Masyarakat Pedesaan Kecamatan Seulimeum. Laporan Penelitian. Pusat Latihan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Banda Aceh.

Abddullah, A. 1988. Struktur Sosial Pedesaan Aceh, Pusat Pengembangan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Syiah Kuala Banda Aceh.

Bebbington, A.2006. Local Capacity, Village Governance, and the Political Economy of Rural Development in Indonesia. World Development. 34(11).

Dharmawan, A.H. 2006. Pembaharuan Tata Pemerintahan Desa Berbasis Lokalitas dan Kemitraan. Bogor: PSP3-IPB.

Djojosoekarto .2009. Kebijakan Otonomi Khusus di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemitraan Partnership.

Eko, S. 2007. Bergerak Menuju Mukim dan Gampong. Yogyakarta: IRE.

Eko, S. 2005. Manifesto Pembaharuan Desa. Yogyakarta: APMD Press.

Gayatri, I.H. 2008. Runtuhnya Gampong di Aceh Studi Masyarakat Desa Yang Bergejolak. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Harley .2008. Mukim Masa ke Masa. Banda Aceh: JKMA.

Hurgronje, C.S. 1985. Aceh di Mata Kolonialis. Jakarta: Jilid I.Yayasan Soko Guru.

Kappi, A.B.D. 1983. Kelompok Elite di Pedesaan : Suatu Studi di Gampong Keude Teunom dan Alue

Ambang Kecamatan Teunom, Kabupaten Aceh Barat. Laporan Penelitian. Pusat Latihan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Banda Aceh.

Kuahaty, Y. 1983. Perubahan Struktur Pemerintahan Gampong dan Implikasinya : Studi di Empat Gampong Kecamatan Suka Jaya Kotamadya Sabang. Laporan Penelitan. Pusat Latihan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Banda Aceh.

Kolopaking, L.M. 2011. Peningkatan Kapasitas dan Penguatan Struktur Kelembagaan Otonomi Desa”, dalam Arif Satria, Menuju Desa 2030, Pohon Cahaya, Yogyakarta.

Maliki, Z. 1999. Penaklukan Negara Atas Rakyat Studi Resistensi Petani Berbasis Religio Politik Santri Terhadap Negaranisasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Mattugengkeng. 1986. Pemasyarakatan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1979 Tentang Pemerintahan Desa : Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Selimeum Aceh Besar. Laporan Penelitian. Pusat Latihan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Banda Aceh.

Merton, R.K. 1969. Social Theory and Social Structure. The Free Press Collier Macmiller Publishers. London.

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M.1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

Nugroho, T. 2008. Pembangunan Desa dari Modernisasi ke Liberalisme. Yogyakarta: Satunama.

Nyak-Pha, H. 2000. Adat dan Budaya Aceh. Banda Aceh: Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Reid, A. 2005. An Indonesian Frontier, Acehnese and Other Histories of Sumatra, Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Satria, A. 2011. Menuju Desa 2030. Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya.

Sujito, A. (ed.) 2007. Membangun Aceh Dari Gampong. Yogyakarta: IRE.

Syarif, S.M. 2001. Menuju Kedaulatan Mukim dan Gampong : Riwang U Seuneubok. Banda Aceh: YAPPIKA dan Yayasan Rumpun Bambu.

Turner, J.H. 1998. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Sixth Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company. United States of America.

Tripa, S. 2003. Rekontruksi Gampong di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Aceh Institute.

Umar, M. 2006. Peradaban Aceh Kilasan Sejarah Aceh dan Adat. Banda Aceh: JKMA.

Warsidi, A. 1977. Pemerintahan Gampong dan Masalah-Masalahnya :Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Peusangan Matang Glumpang Dua Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Laporan Penelitian. Pusat Latihan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Banda Aceh.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.