Cover Image

Learning Strategy of Think Talk Write Based Inquiry Approach Toward the Scientific Communication Ability of Students

Vety Auliasari, Supriyadi Supriyadi, Suharto Linuwih

Abstract


This study has purpose to determine the comparison of the scientific communication ability of students between groups using the think talk write learning based inquiry approach to groups using the experimental learning, and determine the relationship between students' initial ability and students' scientific communication ability. The study was conducted with an experimental approach carried out in grade XI Persiapan Grafika SMK Islam Al Bisyri Semarang, by comparing the Think Talk Write learning groups based inquiry approach to the experimental learning. The variables studied were scientific communication ability obtained through observation during the learning process. The data were analyzed using Mann Whitney U and Spearman Rank. The results showed that the scientific communication ability of the think talk write based inquiry approach learning group based on the inquiry approach reviewd from four components, the Think Talk Write based inquiry approach learning group had the ability to access and utilize the latest library resources, the ability to contribute ideas in group work, the ability to prepare reports in accordance with the guidelines for scientific paper reports, it is better than the experimental learning, however, in the component of communicating products or reports verbally (presentations) did not show a significant difference between the think talk write based inquiry approach learning group and the experimental learning group. The initial ability of students does not affect the scientific communication ability of students in the think talk write learning group based inquiry approach and experimental learning groups.


Keywords


Think Talk Write based Inquiry Approach, Scientific Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baidowi, A. 2015. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Geografi Siswa SMA. Jurnal pendidikan Geografi, (1): 48-58.

Biasutti, M. 2011. The Student Experience of a Collaborative E-Learning University Module. Departement of Education University of Padova, 57 (3): 1865-1875.

Budiyono, A. 2016. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pemikiran Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sains, 4(1): 84-83.

Cahyani, I. 2010. Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Maklah Melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Penelitian pada Mata Kuliah Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Sosiohumanika, 3(2): 175-192.

Campbell, C. A. 1969. Think-Talk-Write: A Behavioristic Pedagogy for Scriba; Fluency. National Council of Teachers of English, 31 (2): 208-215.

Chen, W.C. 2014. Applying the Strategy of Concept Cartoon Argument Instruction to Empower the Children’s Argumentation Ability in A Remote Elementary Science Classroom. Taiwan: National Dong Hwa University.

Derby, M. 2007. Debate: A Teaching-Learning Strategy for Developing Competence in Communication and Critical Thinking. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 81(4): 1-10.

Dewi, L. N. 2013. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Sikap Ilmiah dan Hasil Belajar IPA. E- Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar, 3: 1-10.

Dewi, I.N. 2017. ELSII Learning Model Based Local Wisdom to Improve Students Problem Solving Skills and Scientific Communication. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(1): 107-118.

Gibson, H. L. 2002. Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students’ Attitudes Toward Science. USA: Holyoke Public School.

Ginanjar, W.S. 2015. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1); 32-37.

Hall, D. 2011. Debate: Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Healthcare Professionals. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 9(3): 1-8.

Haristy, D. R. 2013. Pembelajaran Berbasis Literasi Sains Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit di SMA Negeri 1 Pontianak. Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura.

Inoue, N. 2019. Deconstructing teacher expertise for inquiry-based teaching: Looking into consensus building pedagogy in Japanese classrooms. Teaching and teacher education, 77: 366-377.

Jurdak, M. & Rihab, A.Z. 1998. The Effect of Journal Writing on Achievement in and Attitude Toward Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98 (8): 412-419.

Kumara, A. 2001. Dampak Kemampuan Verbal Terhadap Kualitas Ekspresi Tulis. Jurnal Psikologi, (1): 35-40.

Levy, O.S, B. Eylon, & Z. Scherz. 2008. Teaching Communication Skills in Science: Tracing teacher Change. Israel: The Department of Science Teaching, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rechovot, 24: 462-477.

Lie, A. 2005. Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Marhamah, O.S. 2017. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quangga, 9(2): 46-53.

Rhiantini, S. dkk. 2017. Penerapan Metode Two Stay Two Stray dalam Upaya Meningkatan Keterampilan Menulis pada Materi Laporan Pengamatan. Jurnal Pena ilmiah, 2(1): 121-130.

Rivard, L.P & Stanley, B.S. 1999. The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science: An Exploratory Study. Canada: University of Manitoba.

Rustaman, N.Y. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ramadhani, I. 2015. Efek Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dengan Strategi Think Talk Write dan Kreativitas Ilmiah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMA pada Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4 (1): 17-24.

Sapriati, A. 2011. Pembelajaran IPA. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Sejati, A.E. 2016. Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Outdoor Study Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Geografi SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2): 80-86.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v0i0.20626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License


View My Stats