Application of Fuzzy Algorithms and Analytical Hierarchy Process Modification in Decision Support Systems for Lazis Scholarship UNNES

Dimas Bayu Satria Permadi, Alamsyah Alamsyah

Abstract


Lazis scholarship is a scholarship given to underprivileged students and does not yet have a system that supports the decisions to be taken. AHP is one of the most popular decision making methods in solving problems. But, AHP has several weaknesses. So that it will be modified based on previous research and the addition of fuzzy algorithms to get a better decision support system method. The results of this research were A009 students with the final result priority index value of 0.004176516 getting the first position. And the addition and modification in in this research is better than the standard decision support system. Fuzzy c-means produce scores that are more variable than manual grouping. Using sorting and ranking will produce a pairwise comparison matrix that is definitely consistent and has an average faster processing time is 0.028396 seconds, whereas with the standard method is 0.284415 seconds. Modification of alternative priorities also have a relatively faster average implementation time of 0.3165 seconds than the standard calculation with 2.6003 seconds. And modifications to the FPIV, if  taking the top 25 ranking in the standard FPIV produces 3 the same value while in the modified FPIV there is 1 same value.


Keywords


Decision Support System; Scholarship; Fuzzy Tsukamoto; Fuzzy C-Means; Modification AHP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Applications: Some Challenges. Inter’l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2(1), 35-44.

Rivai, V. (2009). Education Management Analisis Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Munthafa, A. E,. & Mubarok, H. (2017). Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi. Jurnal Siliwangi, 3(2), 192-201.

Li, F., Phoon, K. K., Du, X., & Zhang, M. (2013). Improved AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management, 312-320.

Rosmawanti, N., & Bahar. (2014). Penentuan Skala Prioritas Berbasis Algoritma AHP Termodifikasi. Jurnal PROGRESIF, 10(1), 961-970.

Mahmudin, D., Dharma, A. S., Susanto, E., & Wahyu, Y. (2014). Perancangan dan Implementasi Pengontrol Arah Pancaran Radar Pengawas Pantai Terhadap Sudut Tertentu. Jurnal Elektronika dan Telekomunikasi, 14(1), 29-35.

Sediyono, E., Widiasari, I. R., & Milasari. (2006). Penentuan Lokasi Fasilitas Gudang Menggunakan Fuzzy C–Means (FCM). Jurnal Informatika, 2(2), 155-166.

Muhardi. & Nisar. (2015). Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa dengan Algorima Fuzzy C-Means di Universitas Megow Pak Tulang Bawang. Jurnal TIM Darmajaya, 1(2), 158-174.

Sugianti. (2016). Menentukan Penerima KPS Menggunakan Fuzzy Inference System Metode Tsukamoto. Jurnal Ilmiah Multitek Indonesia, 10(1), 48-56.

Faisol, A., Muslim, M. A., & Suyono, H. (2014). Komparasi Fuzzy AHP dengan AHP pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Investasi Properti. Jurnal EECCIS, 8(2), 123-128.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/sji.v7i1.21820

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.