Revealing the Meaning of Implementing the Tax Amnesty Program Through Phenomenology Approaches
(1) Faculty of Economics and Business University of Brawijaya
Abstract
References
Andreoni, James. 1991. The Desirable Of Permanent Tax Amnesty. Journal Of EconomicVol.45: 143-159. University Of Winconsin-Madison, USA.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2013-2017. Data Penduduk Usia Produktif 2013-2017. Accessed at 30th January 2018, dari https://www.bps.go.id.
Bagiyada, I Made. 2016. Tax Amensty Upaya Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi V. Makasar.
Bisnis.liputan6.com. 2017. Tax Amnesty Jadi Tonggak Reformasi Perpajakan Di Indonesia. https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/2886807/tax-amnesty-jadi-tonggak-reformasi-perpajakan-indonesia. Accessed at 1st February 2018.
Bisnis.tempo.co. 2017. Beberapa Penyebab Target Tax Amnesty Tak Tercapai.https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/861850/beberapa-penyebab-target-tax-amnesty-tak-tercapai. Accessed 15th February 2018.
Creswell W. John. 2013. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Darmayasa, I.N. 2016. Diskursus Tax Amnesty melalui RUU Pengampunan Nasional. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting. Vol 4: 111-120.
Harbiansyah, O. 2008. Pendekatan Fenomenologi: Pengantar Praktik Penelitian dalam Ilmu Sosial dan Komunikasi. Mediator Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol 9 (1): 163-180.
Kamayanti, Ari. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi Pengantar Religiusitas Keilmuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Rumah Peneleh.
Kusuma, Hendra. 2017. Tax Amensty Dianggap Gagal, Ini Pembelaan Ditjen Pajak. www.detik.com. Accessed at 21st Mei 2018.
Kuswarno, Engkus. 2009. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjajaran, Perpustakaan Pusat UII.
Malherbe, Jacqueas. 2011. “Tax Amnestiesâ€. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Mangoting, Y. 2016. Domino Sebagai Konsep Kecurangan Pajak: Studi Fenomenologi. Disertasi. Program Doktor Ilmu Akuntansi. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.
Marchese C. 2014. “Tax Amnestyâ€, Iel Paper In Comparative Analysis Of Institutions, Economics And LawVol.17: 1-16.
Mattielo, G. 2005. Multiple Tax Amnesties and Tax Compliance (Forgiving Seventy Times Seven). Venezia Working Paper. Università Ca’Foscari.
Memon, Najeeb. 2015. Designing a Tax Amnesty – One Size Doesn’t Fit All. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin. Vol.21: 2-5.
Primadhyta, Safyra. 2017. CORE: Hasil Dari Tax Amnesty Jauh Dari Ekspektasi. www.cnnindonesia.com. Accessed at 22nd Mei 2018.
Said, Emmiryzan. 2016. Tax Policy In Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experienced Of The Republic Of Indonesia. Laws, 6(4): 16.
Saracoglu, Osman Fatih. Caskurlu, Eren. 2011. Tax Amnesty with Effects and Effecting Aspects: Tax Compliance, Tax Audits and Enforcements Around; The Turkish Case. International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2:150-160.
Suryamalang.tribunnews.com. 2017. Hasil Pajak dari Tax Amnesty di Malang Raya Hampir 780 Miliar, Simak Datanya. http://suryamalang.tribunnews.com/2017/03/21/hasil-pajak-dari-tax-amnesty-malang-raya-hampir-780-miliar-simak-datanya. Accessed on March 2018.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License