The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance on the Relationship between Political Connections and Tax Avoidance

Wahyu Widarjo(1), Eko Arief Sudaryono(2), Bambang Sutopo(3), Muhammad Syafiqurrahman(4), Juliati Juliati(5),


(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(4) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(5) Universitas Sebelas Maret

Abstract

We analyze the influence of political connections on tax avoidance and the moderating role of corporate governance on the relationship between political connections and tax avoidance. The results of panel data regression analysis on 512 observations of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2017 shows that political connections do not have a significant effect on tax avoidance. Furthermore, the results of the moderated regression analysis show that the effectiveness of corporate governance positively moderates the effect of political connections on tax avoidance. Although the results of this analysis indicate that a moderating effect on the effectiveness of corporate governance, but the direction of the regression coefficient is positive. Therefore, the second hypothesis in this study is rejected. The results of this study indicate that the corporate governance mechanism in the sample companies is still not optimal in reducing the level of tax avoidance.

Keywords

Political Connections, Corporate Governance, Tax Avoidance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhikari, A., C. Derashid, and H. Zhang. (2006). Public Policy, Political Connections, and Effective Tax Rates: Longitudinal Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25: 574-595.

Armstrong, C. S., J. I. Blouin, and D. F. Larcker. (2012). The Incentives for Tax Planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53: 391-411.

Bovi, M. (2005). Book-Tax Gap, An Income Horse Race. Working Paper, No. 61, Desember 2005.

Dash, S. and M. Raithatha. (2018). Impact of Disputed Tax Litigation Risk on Firm Performance: Evidence from India. Accounting Research Journal, 31(3): 458-478.

Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. (2006). Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79: 145-179.

Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. (2006). Is There a Link Between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud? Journal of Accounting Research, 44: 113-143.

Habib, A., A. H. Muhammadi, and H. Jiang. (2017). Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 52(1): 45-63.

Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod (2009). What Does Tax Aggressiveness Signal? Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to News about Tax Shelter Involvement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1): 126-141.

Kim. C., and L. Zhang. (2016). Corporate Political Connections and Tax Aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1): 78-114.

Machuga, S., and K. Teitel (2009). Board of director characteristics and earnings quality surrounding implementation of a corporate governance code in Mexico. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 18(1), 1–13.

Martinez, A. L., and G. C. Romalho. (2014). Family Firms and Tax Aggressiveness in Bazil. International Business Research, 7(3): 129-136.

Midiastuty, P. P., S. Eddy, H. Madani, dan A. Rahmi. (2016). Pengaruh Perubahan Tarif Pajak Badan Menurut UU No. 36 Tahun 2008 terhadap Praktik Manajemen Laba Perusahaan Non Manufaktur. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 18.

Miettinen, T. and P. Poutvaara. (2014). A Market for Connections. European Journal of Political Economy, 33: 37-52.

Minnick, K., and T. Noga. (2010). Do Corporate Governance Characteristics Influence Tax Management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16: 703-718.

Moghani, R., and S. Mohmmadi. (2016). Relationships between Mechanisms of Corporate Governance and Tax Gap Using SPSS Software: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 4(3): 9-13.

Noor, F. (2010). Keuangan Publik: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengkajian Keuangan Publik dan Akuntansi Pemerintah (LPKPAP).

Peng, F., Y. G. Shan, W. Wu, and L. Zhang. (2019). Litigation Risk and Firm Performance: A Mediation Effect via Debt Financing. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3383915

Pranoto, B. A., dan A. K. Widagdo. (2016). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik dan Corporate Governance terhadap Tax Aggressiveness. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional dan The 3rd Call for Syariah Paper.

Qian, M., H. Pan, and B. Yeung. (2011). Expropriation of Minority Interest Shareholders in Politically-Connected Firms. Working Paper. National University of Singapore Business School.

Samuel, F. A., and U. O. Ranti. (2013). Effects of Strategic Tax Behaviors on Corporate Governance, International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(6): 326-330.

Sandy, S., dan N. Lukviarman. (2015). Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Tax Avoidance: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2): 85-98.

Sartori, N, (2008). Effects of Strategic Tax Behaviors on Corporate Governance. Tersedia secara online di: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1358930 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1358930 (Diakses pada 20 Mei 2017).

Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. (1998). The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

Strenger, C. (2004). The Corporate Governance Scorecard: a tool for the implementation of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 12(1), 11–15.

Sudaryono, E. A., Djuminah, S. Hartoko, and H. D. Perdana. 2016. Corporate Governance and Earnings Management Around the Implementation UU No. 36/2008. Scholary Journal of Science Research and Essay. November. Tersedia secara on line di: http://www.scholarity-journals.com/SJSRE (Diakses pada 20 November 2017).

Sugiyanto, H., and A. Assagaf. (2017). Factors Affecting the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance in Control of Operation and Finance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(1), 32-45

Tang, T. Y. H., and M. Firth. (2012). Earnings Persistence and Stock Market Reactions to the Different Information in Book-Tax Differences: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(3): 369-397.

Utama, C. A., S. Utama, and F. Amarullah. (2017). Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure: Indonesia Evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2):165-191.

Wahyudin, A., and B. Solikhah. (2017). Corporate governance implementation rating in Indonesia and its effects on financial performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 250–265.

Zaidirina, N. A., N. A. Lindrianasari, and S. Bangsawan. (2017). Implementation of corporate governance and mandatory disclosure in the Indonesian banking sector: good news or bad news. International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 10(3/4), 281-294.

Zeng, T. (2014). Derivative financial instruments, tax aggressiveness and firm market value. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 6(4), 376–390.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License