Lack of Financial Reporting Using Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory
(1) Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Diponegoro
(2) Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Diponegoro
Abstract
Research purposes: This paper examines factors affecting fraudulent financial reporting based on Crowe’s fraud pentagon theory. Pentagon theory elements include pressure (financial stability, financial target, external pressure), opportunity (the independent board of commissioners), rationalization (change in auditor), competence (director change), arrogance (frequent number of directors’ display picture in the annual report).
Methods: This study used secondary data gathered from annual reports and financial reports of companies in the manufacturing sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2015-2019. Data analysis method tested using logistic regression analysis.
Results: The results showed that financial stability and auditor change effects on fraudulent financial reporting. Results also show that financial target, external pressure, independent board of commissioners, directors change, and a frequent number of director’s display picture in an annual report does not affect the fraudulent financial reporting.
Novelty: The combination of using pentagon theory with Beneish M-Score as a prediction of financial statement fraud. The contribution of this research is to provide input to report’s users to pay attention to pressure and rationalization factors in fraudulent financial reporting.
Keywords
References
AICPA. (2002). AU Section 316. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. SAS No. 99. In October (Issues 99, 113, pp. 167–218).
Ariyanto, D., Jhuniantara, I. M. G., Ratnadi, N. M. D., Putri, I. G. A. M. A. D., & Dewi, A. A. (2021). Fraudulent financial statements in pharmaceutical companies: Fraud pentagon theory perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.5.009
Bawakes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M. ., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134.
Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian teori fraud pentagon terhadap farudulent financial reporting (studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Buras Efek Indonesia tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah, 13(1 (Mei)), 114–134.
Crowe, Horwath. (2012). The mind behind the fraudsters crime: key behavioral and environmental elements. In Crowe Horwath LLP.
Crowe, Howarth. (2010). IIA Practice Guide: Fraud and Internal Audit. In Western Regional Conference. Fitri, F. A., Syukur, M., & Justisa, G. (2019). Do the fraud triangle components motivate fraud in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 13(4), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v13i4.5
Ghafoor, A., Zainudin, R., & Mahdzan, N. S. (2019). Factors Eliciting Corporate Fraud in Emerging Markets: Case of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 587–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3877-3
Haliem, B., & Nurdiana, T. (2019). Garuda geger, ini 5 kasus mencengangkan di maskapai ini. Kontan, Nasional.
Handoko, B. L., Hendra, E., & Anandita, B. (2019). Factors affecting fraudulent statement in forensic accounting perspective. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1, November), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A3889.119119
Handoko, B. L., & Natasya. (2019). Fraud diamond model for fraudulent financial statement detection. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3, September), 6865–6872. https://
doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5838.098319
Hasnan, S., Rahman, R. A., & Mahenthiran, S. (2013). Management motive, weak governance, earnings management, and fraudulent financial reporting: Malaysian evidence. Journal of International Accounting Research, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-50353
Hugo, J. (2019). Efektivitas Model Beneish M-Score Dan Model F-Score dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.24912/ jmieb.v3i1.2296
Idris, M. (2020). Jejak Hitam PT Hanson International, Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan 2016. Kompas.Com, money/news.
Indarto, S. L., & Ghozali, I. (2016). Fraud diamond: Detection analysis on the fraudulent financial reporting. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 6(4 Fall-Continued-1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i4c1art1
Martins, O. S., & Júnior, R. V. (2020). The influence of corporate governance on the mitigation of fraudulent financial reporting. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios Review of Business Management, 22(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i1.4039
Nindito, M. (2018). Financial statement fraud: Perspective of the Pentagon Fraud model in Indonesia. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(3), 1–9.
Omukaga, K. O. (2019). Is the fraud diamond perspective valid in Kenya? Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0141
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., & Achmad, T. (2018). A pilot study of corporate governance and accounting fraud: The fraud diamond model. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.24052/jbrmr/v12is02/apsocgaaftfdm
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., Achmad, T., Khaddafi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XIII(2 (56), Spring), 549–560.
Putra, W. M. (2019). Analysis Of Financial Fraud Using The Fraud Diamond Model With Corporate Governance As The Moderating Variable. Advances in Economic, Business and Management Research, 102(5th International Conference of Accounting and Finance), 163–169. https://doi. org/10.2991/icaf-19.2019.27
Qolbi, N. (2019). Terseret kasus SNP Finance, Deloitte Indonesia berupaya cari jalan keluar. Kontan, Keuangan.
Repousis, S. (2016). Using Beneish model to detect corporate financial statement fraud in Greece. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2014-0055
Siddiq, R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar. (2017). Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement. Seminar Nasional Dan the 4Th Call Syariah Paper, 1–14. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/9210
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99 in Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. In Corporate Governance and Firm Performance Advances in Financial Economics (Vol. 13).
Tessa, C., & Harto, P. (2016). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan Dan Perbankan Di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, Lampung, 1–21. file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/ Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Pada Sektor Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia.pdf
Umar, H., Partahi, D., & Purba, R. B. (2020). Fraud diamond analysis in detecting fraudulent financial report. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 6638–6646.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://doi.org/DOI:
Yulianti, Pratami, S. R., Widowati, Y. S., & Prapti, L. (2019). Influence Of Fraud Pentagon Toward Fraudulent Financial Reporting In Indonesia An Empirical Study On Financial Sector Listed In Indonesian Stock Exchange. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(08)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License