Kepribadian Dosen yang Berpengaruh terhadap Prestasi Belajar

Vicky Dwi Saputra; Ahyar Yuniawan

doi:10.15294/jdm.v3i2.2437

Kepribadian Dosen yang Berpengaruh terhadap Prestasi Belajar

Vicky Dwi Saputra⁽¹⁾, Ahyar Yuniawan⁽²⁾,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v3i2.2437

(1) Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, Semarang
(2) Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH., Tembalang, Semarang

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan faktor yang menyebabkan penurunan prestasi belajar mahasiswa di Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro dan menganalisis pengaruh kepribadian dosen terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa. Data penelitian dikumpulkan dari 100 mahasiswa program Akuntansi, Manajemen, dan Ilmu Ekonomi Studi PembangunanÂ yang memiliki jangka waktu minimal lima semester studi. Pertanyaan-pertanyaan dengan menggunakan kuesioner diberikan melalui teknik purposive sampling. Jenis sampling yang digunakan adalah kuota sampling, kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan regresi berganda dan nilai jangka indeks menggunakan SPSS 16. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa semua jenis kepribadian empat (optimis, mudah tersinggung, melankolis dan apatis) memiliki dampak positif dan signifikan terhadap prestasi belajar. Dengan pengaruh 43,3% sedangkan 56,7% dipengaruhi oleh variabel lain.

This study aimed to determine factor causing degradation of achievement learn student in Faculty of Economics and Business University Diponegoro and analyse influence personality of lecturer to achievement learn student. Research data collected from 100 students in the program of Accounting, Management, and IESP (Economics of Development Studies) that has minimal period of five semesters of study. The questions using a questionnaire administered through purposive sampling technique. The type of sampling that used was quota sampling, then analyzed using multiple regression and the value of the index run with SPSS 16. The analysis showed that all four personality types (sanguine, choleric, melancholic and phlegmatic) has a positive and significant impact on learning achievement. With the influence of 43.3% while 56.7% are influenced by other variables

Keywords

Sanguine; Melancholic; Holeric; Phlegmatic; Learning Achievement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Issa, A & Sulieman, H. 2007. Student evaluations of teaching: perceptions and biasing factors. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol. 15. Issue. 3, pp: 303-317.

Bathmaker, A. 2005. Becoming a lecturer in further education in England: the construction of professional identity and the role of communities of practice. Journal of Education for Teaching. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp: 47-62.

Boyd, P., Allan, S & Reale, P. 2010. Being a Teacher Educator: pedagogy, scholarship and identity of lecturers in teacher education in further education workplace contexts. Unpublished Thesis. University of Cumbria.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Adrian, F & Martin, L. 2007. Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences. Vol. 17, pp: 241-250.

Emery, C. E., Kramerand, T. R & Tian, R. G. 2003. Return to academic standards: a critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Quality Assurance in Education. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp: 37-46.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J & Ashill, N. 2006. The Determinants of Studentsâ€™ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. Vol. 4, Issue. 2, pp: 215-235.

Henderson, M & Bradey, S. 2008. Recognising the importance of identity in the development of academics pedagogical beliefs and web-enhanced teaching practices. Unpublished Thesis. Proceedings of Society for Information Technoligy and Teacher Education International Conference, Australia.

Littauer, F. 2008. Personality Plus: Bagaimana Memahami Orang Lain dengan Memahami Diri Anda Sendiri. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Makmun, A. S. 2006. Psikologi Kependidikan Perangkat Sistem Pengajaran Modul. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maxwell, B. 2010. In-service initial teacher education in the learning and skills sector in England: integrating course and workplace learning. Vocations and Learning. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp: 185-202.

Surakhmad, W. 2006. Pengantar Interaksi Mengajar Belajar. Bandung: Tarsito.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. 2005. Diperbanyak oleh Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.