Efek Moderasi Kerja Cerdas pada Pengaruh Kompetensi, Reward, Motivasi terhadap Kinerja

Widodo -(1),


(1) Jl.Raya Kaligawe Km.4, Semarang 50112, Indonesia

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia pada motivasi pengelola, menganalisis pengaruh kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia pada kinerja pengelola, menganalisis pengaruh reward pada motivasi pengelola, menganalisis pengaruh reward pada kinerja pengelola, menganalisis pengaruh motivasi pada kinerja pengelola serta menguji peran moderasi variabel kerja cerdas. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 148 pengelola KJKS BMT Bina Ummat Sejahtera Lasem. Data didapatkan dengan menyebar kuesioner kemudian diolah menggunakan SEM yang dioperasikan melalui program AMOS. Hasil penelitian menemukan, bahwa semua hipotesis didukung dan sesuai dengan penelitian terdahulu. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menyatakan, bahwa kompetensi SDM berpengaruh signifikan dan positif pada motivasi pengelola, reward berpengaruh positif dan signfikan pada motivasi pengelola, reward berpengaruh positif dan signifikan pada kinerja pengelola, motivasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan pada kinerja pengelola, selain itu variabel kerja cerdas ditemukan bisa menjadi variabel moderating yang melemahkan pengaruh motivasi pada kinerja.

 


The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of human resource competency on manager’s motivation and performance, to investigate the effect of reward on manager’s motivation and performance, to examine the impact of motivation on manager’s performance and to test smart work as moderating variable. Sample of the study is 148 managers of KJKS BMT Bina Umat Sejahtera Lasem.  Questionnaires are used to collect data. Data analysis use Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results show that human resource competency has positive and significant effect on managers’ motivation. Reward and motivation have positive and significant influence on managers’ performance. Moreover work smart variable as moderating variable weaken the effect of motivation on performance.

Keywords

Competencies; Motivation; Reward; Smart working; Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Cardy, R. L & Selvarajan, T. T. 2006. Competencies: Alternative Frameworks for Competitive Advantage. Business Horizons. Vol. 49, pp: 235-245.

Ferdinand, A. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Edisi 3. Semarang: BP. UNDIP.

Hartati, I. 2005. Pengaruh Kesesuaian Kompetensi dan Motivasi Kinerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dan Karyawan, Sekretaris Daerah Malang. Jurnal Eksekutif. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp: 63-80.

Korossy, K. 1997. Extending the Theory of Knowledge Spaces: A Competence Performance Approach. Zeltschrift Fur Psychologle. Vol. 205, pp: 53-82.

Ley, T & Albert, D. 2003. Identifying Employee Competencies in Dynamic Work Domains: Methodological Considerations and A Case Study. Journal of Universal Computer Science. Vol. 9, No. 12, pp: 1500-1518.

Mu’allim, A. 2003. Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah. Jurnal Al Mawarid Edisi X. pp: 17-31.

Paulsson, K., Ivergard, T & Hunt, B. 2004. Learning Atwork: Competence Development or Competence-Stress. Applied Ergonomics. Vol. 36, pp: 135-144.

Peters, M. L & Zelewski, S. 2007. Assigment of Employees to Workplaces Under Consideration of Employee Competences and Preferences. Management Research News. Vol. 30, No. 2, pp: 84-99.

Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P & Mackenze, S. B., 2006. Relationships Between Leader Reward and Punishment Behavior and Subordinate Attitudes, Perceptions, and Behaviors: A Metanalytic Review of Existing and New Research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decesion Processes. Vol. 99, pp: 113-142.

Rapp, A., Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J & Schillewaert, N. 2006. The Impact of Knowledge and Empowerment on Working Smart and Working Hard: The Moderating Role of Experience. Intern. J. of Research in Marketing. Vol. 23, pp: 279-293.

Riggio, R. E & Lee, J. 2007. Emotional and Interpersonal Competencies and Leader Development. Human Resource Management Review. Vol. 17, pp: 418-426.

Robbins, S. P & Coulter, M. 2008. Management. Bandung: Erlangga.

Schwartz, S. J & Waterman, A. S. 2006. Changing Interests: A Longitudinal Study of Intrinsic Motivation for Personally Salient Activities. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 40, pp: 1119-1136.

Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., Godin, I., Marmot, M., Niedhammer, I & Peter, R. 2004. The Measurement of Effort-Reward Imbalance At Work: European Companisons. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 58, pp: 1483-1499.

Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A & Kumar, N. 1994. Learning Oriantation,Working Smart, and Effective Selling. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 58.

Sujan, H., Weitz, B. A & Sujan, M. 1988. Increasing Sales Productivity By Getting Salespeople To Work Smarter. Journal Of Personal Selling And Sales Management.

Sutton, S. K. 2004. Individual Differences in Incentive and Threat Motivation: Of Brain Activity and Blinkof Modulatio. Journal of Research in Personality. Vol. 38, pp: 32-34.

Tsutsumi, A & Kawakami, N. 2004. A Review of Empirical Studies on The Model of Effort Reward Imbalance At Work: Reducing Occupational Stress by Implementing a New Theory. Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 59, pp: 2335-2359.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




mandiri88

slot88

slot thailand

tokeslot88 langkah 4d toto macau Hayobet slot depo 10k

tokeslot88 tokeslot88 langkah4d langkah4d langkah4d gdtoto


POSKOBET POSKOBET POSTOTO787 POSTOTO787 EMAS787 EMAS787 SUNDA787 SUNDA787/ ASIABET777 ASIABET777 https://pdakmi.kemenag.go.id https://mega888slots.com

tokeslot88 diamond murah voucher game

mideatoto

cemilanbet

tokeslot

gdtoto

situs slot gacor

POSTOTO787

situs slot gacor

slot88