Sensitivity of Size-measure in Firm-life Cycle Theory: Total Asset vs Total Sales
Abstract
Using different firm size proxies in financial research produces varying empirical results. The purpose of the paper is to find out the most appropriate firm size proxy between total sales and total assets in explaining asymmetric information at each stage of the firm life cycle. Pooled data were obtained as many as 3467 observation units from the annual reports of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2008-2019 period. In-line functional regression analysis based on dummy percentiles was used to answer research questions. Empirical results have explained that total sales have greater goodness of fit as a proxy for firm size than total assets. The presence of asymmetric information produces debt issues as a signal of poor quality firms. Thus, many previous studies may not be robust and biased.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, B., Akbar, M., Sabahat, T., Ali, S., Hussain, A., Akbar, A., & Hongming, X. (2021). Does Firm Life Cycle Impact Corporate Investment Efficiency? Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(1), 1–13.
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Finance Journal of Economics, 84.
Anthony, JH, & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices. A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2–3), 203–227.
Moon, LT, & Yan, Z. (2012). Firm Maturity and the Pecking Order Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Cariola, A., La Rocca, M., & La Rocca, T. (2011). Overinvestment and Underinvestment Problems: Determining Factors, Consequences and Solutions. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Cempakasari, EP, Firdaus, M., & Hardiyanto, AT (2019). Dynamics of Firm’s Capital Structure Along The Life Cycle of Indonesian Manufacturing Firms. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, January.
Dalbor, MC, Kim, A., & Upneja, A. (2004). An Initial Investigation of Firm Size and Debt Use by Small Restaurant Firms. Journal of Hospitality Financial Management, 12(1), 41–48.
Dang, CD, Li, F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring Firm Size in Empirical Corporate Finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159–176.
Das, S., & Roy, M. (2007). Inter-Industry Differences in Capital Structure: the Evidence from India. Finance India, 21(2), 517.
DeAngelo, H., Linda, D., & René, MS (2006). Dividend Policy and the Earned/Contributed Capital Mix: a Test of the Life-Cycle Theory. Theory. Journal of Financial Economics.
Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle. Accounts. Rev., 86(6).
Drobetz, W., Pensa, P., & Wanzenried, G. (2006). Firm Characteristics and Dynamic Capital Structure Adjustment. Social Science Research Network, 10(April), 1–36.
Frank, M., & Goyal, V. (2003a). Capital Structure Decisions. AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings.
Frank, M., & Goyal, V. (2003b). Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67.
Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. (2014). Basic Econometrics.
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1990). Capital Structure and the Informational Role of Debt. The Journal of Finance.
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The Theory of Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance.
Hashmi, SD, Gulzar, S., Ghafoor, Z., & Naz, I. (2020). Sensitivity of Firm Size measures to Practices of Corporate Finance: Evidence from BRICS. Future Business Journal, 6(1).
Jensen, M. . (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 3(1), 305–360.
Klein, LS, O’Brien, TJ, & Peters, SR (2002). Debt vs. Equity and Asymmetric Information: a review. Financial Reviews.
La-Rocca, M.., La-Rocca, T.., & Cariola, A. (2011). Capital Structure Decisions during a Firm’s Life Cycle. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 107–130.
La Rocca, M., La Rocca, T., & Cariola, A. (2007). Overinvestment and Underinvestment Problems: Determining Factors, Consequences and Solutions. Corporate Ownership and Control, 5(1), 79–95.
Martono, S., Yulianto, A., Witiastuti, RS, & Wijaya, AP (2020). The Role of Institutional Ownership and Industry characteristics on the propensity to pay dividend: An insight from company open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3).
Martono, S., Yulianto, & AP, Wi. (2021). Growth Opportunities Utilization: Debt Overhang or Asymmetric Information? S. MARTONO*, Arief Yulianto**, Angga Pandu Wijaya***. Foundation of Management, 13, 171–182.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
Monica, J., & Pramesti, M. (2017). Pecking Order Theory Testing on Non-Financial Surplus Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Technology Management, 16(2), 185–196.
Myers, S. (1984a). The Capital Structure Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592.
Myers, S. (1984b). The search for Optimal Capital Structure. Midland Corporate Finance Journal.
Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information The Investors Do Not Have. In NBER Working Paper (Working Paper No. 1396).
Parsons, C., & Titman, S. (2009). Empirical Capital Structure: A review. books.google.com.
Paula, C., Tascón Fernández, MT, & Amor Tapia, B. (2016). The Role of Life Cycle on the Firm’s Capital Structure. Pecvnia : Revista de La Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, 19, 131.
Ross, S. (1973). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2).
Ross, S. (1977). Determination of Financial Structure: the Incentive-Signalling Approach. Bell J Econ, 8(1), 23–40.
Teixeira, G., & Coutinho dos Santos, MJ (2011). Do Firms Have Financing Preferences along their Life Cycle? SSRN Electronic Journal.
UU no. 20. (2008). UU no. 20 of 2008. Government of the Republic of Indonesia.
Yulianto, A., Witiastuti, RS, & Widiyanto. (2021). Debt versus equity—open innovation to reduce asymmetric information. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3).
View Counter: Abstract - 443 and PDF - 600
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
