Effect of Flippeed Classroom Models and Creative Thinking of Science Literation Students

Wiwi Susanti(1), Asep Supena(2), Ucu Cahyana(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v6i1.23936


(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

The flipped classroom model, which is often heard in recent years, is known as a new pedagogical approach in which traditional instruction is reversed. The study aims to determine the effect of the flipped classroom model and creative thinking on the scientific literacy of grade VI students of SDN Guntur 01, South Jakarta. This research uses a 2x2 factorial design. The research sample was divided into two treatment groups, namely the experimental class and the control class. The experimental class was given treatment by carrying out the learning model of the flipped classroom , while the control class was given treatment by carrying out the expository model learning. The results showed: (1) there was a difference in scientific literacy between the experimental class and the control class, with scientific literacy higher than the control class.  (2) there is a difference in scientific literacy between groups of students with high levels of creative thinking in the experimental class [A 1 B 1 ] and the control class [A 2 B 1 ]. (3) there is a difference in scientific literacy between groups of students with low creative thinking levels in the experimental class [A 1 B 2 ] and the control class [A 2 B 2 ].  (4) there is an effect of interaction between learning models and creative thinking on scientific literacy. Purpose of the flipped classroom model is to use face to face time more effectively in the learning process. There are many definitions related to flipped classroom is a student-centred learning method consisting of two parts with interactive learning activities during lesson and individual teaching based on computer out of lesson.

Keywords

flipped classroom model; expository model; scientific literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aaron, S., Jon, B., Kristin, D., Brian, B., Helaine, W. M., & Arfstrom, P. K. M. (2014). Definition of Flipped Learning. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning/

Alzoubi, A. M., Al Qudah, M. F., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). The Effect of Creative Thinking Education in Enhancing Creative Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Motivation. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v6n1p117

Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and Its Use for Information Literacy Instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2014.8.1.161

Baumtrog, M. D. (2017). Others and imagination in reasoning and argumentation: Improving our critical creative capacity. Informal Logic, 37(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v37i2.4 769

Bausell, R. B. (1994). Conducting Meaningful Experiments: 40 Steps to Becoming a Scientist. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Bergmann, J., Sams, A., & Bruss, K. (2015). Watch and Learn; Flipped Learning. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://webcasts.astd.org/uploads/assets/264/document/TDFlippedLearning.pdf

Berman, E. A., & Kuden, J. L. (2017). Scientific literacy. In Agriculture to Zoology (pp. 17-26). UK: Chandos Publishing.

Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE (pp. 161–163). Atlanta. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684807

Bristol, T. (2014). Flipping the Classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002

Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using Research to Answer Practical Questions about Homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143-153.

Eddy, G. S., & Suryono, Y. (2019). Implementation of Online Learning Lessons in the Package C Program. Journal of Nonformal Education, 5(2), 117–124.

Fauziah, P., & Kusumawardani, E. (2019). The Concept of Innovation Classes Through The Parent Partnership Model at School. Journal of Nonformal Education, 5(2), 189–196.

Freddi, A. M. S. (2019). Design of experiment.†Design Principles and Methodologies. UK: Springer

Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.

Gonzalez Rodriguez, E., Cardenas, J. C., Cox, C. S., Kitagawa, R. S., Stensballe, J., Holcomb, J. B., … Wade, C. E. (2018). Traumatic brain injury is associated with increased syndecan-1 shedding in severely injured patients. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0565-3

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.

Kellinger, J. J. (2012). The flipside: Concerns about the “New literacies†paths educators might take. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 524–536.

Kordyban, R., & Kinash, S. (2013). No more flying on auto pilot: The flipped classroom. Education Technology Solutions, 56(1), 54–56.

Maharani, H. R., Sukestiyarno, S., & Waluya, B. (2017). Creative thinking process based on wallas model in solving mathematics problem. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 177–184.

Martinez-Hernandez, K., Ikpeze, C., & Kimaru, I. (2015). Perspectives on Science Literacy: A comparative study of United States and Kenya. Educational Research International, 4(2), 25-30.

McCarthy, J. (2016). Reflections on a flipped classroom in first year higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 26(2), 332–350.

Millard, E. (2012). Reasons Flipped Classrooms Work: Turning lectures into homework to boost student engagement and increase technologyfueled creativity. UK: University Business.

Overmyer, G. R. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Model for College Algebra : Effects on Student Achievement. Colorado: Colorado State University Fort Collins.

Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped Classroom Approach. World Journal on Educational Technology, 8(8), 98–105.

Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368.

Rusdi, A. (2017). Hubungan Kemampuan Membaca, Berpikir Kreatif dan sikap terhadap sains dengan Literasi Sains Pencemaran Lingkungan Siswa MAN Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1), 72–80.

Sales, N. (2014). Flipping the classroom: Revolutionising legal research training. Legal Information Management, 13(4), 231–235.

Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Sommer, M., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2018). Impact of the flipped classroom on learner achievement and satisfaction in an undergraduate technology literacy course. Journal of Information Technology Education, 17(1), 159-182.

Suryanti, I. M. L. N. (2018). Process skills approach to develop primary students’ scientific literacy: A case study with low achieving students on water cycle. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 296, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing.

Wakabayashi, N. (2015). Flipped classroom as a strategy to enhance active learning. Kokubyo Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Stomatological Society, 81(1), 1–7.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing & Abstracting