Practical Analysis of Field Experiences: Studies on Prospective Early Childhood Education Teachers

Amirul Mukminin(1), Akaat Hasjiandito(2), Ghanis Putra Widhanarto(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v6i2.26456


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract

The implementation of PPL is carried out by students of educational programs in Indonesia. This research aims to determine student performance in implementing PPL in the PGPAUD Study Program and determine the inhibiting and supporting factors of implementation PPL of PGPAUD students. This research was conducted based on a quantitative line of thought. Even so, technically, qualitative methods cannot be abandoned, especially concerning the importance of the study results' versatility. The subjects of this study were school principals and tutors of partner schools in Central Java Province. Data will be collected in two ways, namely a questionnaire in the form of a subject's self-response to statements made based on the PPL implementation assessment module's indicators. The implementation of learning can be described as 12.8% of respondents believe that students are in an outstanding category, 49.8% of respondents think that students are in a suitable type. There are 37.4% of respondents who say that they are not right. Inhibiting factors for PPL implementation for PGPAUD students include the practitioner's ability to establish a social relationship with the school community. Meanwhile, the factors that support the implementation of PPL for PGPAUD students include the location of PPL places that are close to the campus, the majority of PGPAUD lecturers are still young, online assessment and monitoring systems, good relations between partner schools and PGPAUD majors, internship programs 1 and 2 and field observations of subjects. PPL is designed jointly between the PGPAUD department and partner schools, so that it will run effectively.

Keywords

Competence; Quality of Graduates

Full Text:

PDF

References

Blanchard, N. P., & Thacker, J. W. (2007). Effective Training: Systems, Strategies and Practices.

Borg, S., Clifford, I., & Htut, K. P. (2018). Having an EfECT: Professional development for teacher educators in Myanmar. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 75-86.

Boyd, G. (1988). The impact of society on educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 114-122.

Briant, E., & Doherty, C. (2012). Teacher educators mediating curricular reform: Anticipating the Australian curriculum. Teaching Education, 23(1), 51-69.

Cascio, W. F. (2019). Training trends: Macro, micro, and policy issues. Human Resource Management Review, 29(2), 284-297.

Cebesoy, U. B., & Oztekin, C. (2018). Genetics literacy: Insights from science teachers’ knowledge, attitude, and teaching perceptions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(7), 1247-1268.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2004). Acuan Menu Pembelajaran Pada Kelompok Bermain/ Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan anak Usia Dini

Geeraerts, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of intergenerational knowledge flows. Teaching and teacher education, 56, 150-161.

Green, T. L. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational administration quarterly, 51(5), 679-711.

Gutama. (2004). Early Childhood Care and Development in Indonesia. Jakarta: Forum PAUD

Herr, J. (2012). Creative resources for the early childhood classroom. Cengage Learning.

Hussin, H., Bunyarit, F., & Hussein, R. (2009). Instructional design and eâ€learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(1), 4–19.

Jacenyik-Trawöger, J. C. M. M. A. B. C. (2013). Walking out the door: casualisation and implementing Moodle. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(1), 5–14.

Jonker, H., März, V., & Voogt, J. (2019). Collaboration in teacher design teams: Untangling the relationship between experiences of the collaboration process and perceptions of the redesigned curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 138-149.

Kasrani. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. 25(2), 233-243

Ketola, A. (2016). Towards a multimodally oriented theory of translation: A cognitive framework for the translation of illustrated technical texts. Translation Studies, 9(1), 67-81.

Lytras, M. D., De Pablos, P. O., Avison, D., Sipior, J., Jin, Q., Leal Filho, W., ... & Horner, D. G. (Eds.). (2010). Technology Enhanced Learning: Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform: 1st International Conference, Tech-education 2010, Athens, Greece, May 19-21, 2010. Proceedings (Vol. 73). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mukminin, A., & Arso, S. P. (2015). Building Center Health Program at Indonesian Preschool (Prospect & Challenges). Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 4(1), 57-63.

Munandar, U. (1999). Mengembangkan bakat dan kreativitas anak sekolah. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Novakovich, J., Miah, S., & Shaw, S. (2017). Designing curriculum to shape professional social media skills and identity in virtual communities of practice. Computers & Education, 104, 65-90.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Permenristekdikti Nomor 55 tahun 2017 pasal 1 butir 8, tentang program Pengtifenalan Lapangan Persekolahan (PLP)

Seefeldt, W., & Wasik, B. A. (2008). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jakarta: PT. Indek.

Seufert, S., Meier, C., Soellner, M., & Rietsche, R. (2019). A Pedagogical Perspective on Big Data and Learning Analytics: A Conceptual Model for Digital Learning Support. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(4), 599–619.

She, H. C., Lin, H. S., & Huang, L. Y. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 (PISA 2015) performance of students in Taiwan: The role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309-1340.

Silverman, J. (2016). Distance Learning, E-Learning and Blended Learning in Mathematics Education International Trends in Research. In The Blended Learning Concept e:t:p:M@Math: Practical Insights and Research Findings (Vol. 13).

Solehuddin. (2004). Memfasilitasi Perkembangan Berpikir dan Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini. Pedagogi. 2(1), 78.

Suharsiwi. (2015). Model Development of Social Learning Skill for Autism Children At Kindergarten. Jurnal VISI, 10(1).

Töremen, F., Karakuş, M., & Yasan, T. (2009). Total quality management practices in Turkish primary schools. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(1), 30–44.

UPT PPL. (2017). Buku Paket PPL Materi Sajian Orientasi PPL di Kampus. Semarang: UNNES Press

Wang, F. L., Fong, J., & Kwan, R. C. (2009). Handbook of research on hybrid learning models: Advanced tools, technologies, and applications. In Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications.

Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 385–399.

Wing-mui, S., May-hung, C., & Chiao-liang, T. (1996). An Impact of Teaching Practice: Perception of Teacher Competence among Student-teachers. Journal of Primary Education 6(1 & 2), 45-56.

Wong, E. O. W. (2014). Leadership style for school-based management in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 17, 243–247.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing & Abstracting