Pancasila Values in the Study of Corruption Cases in Indonesia

Catleya Azka Aninda(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v3i1.36013


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Pancasila is the basis of the Indonesian state which is used as the guideline for the Indonesian state. Pancasila means five principles or five principles. The relationship between corruption and Pancasila is that corruption is behavior that violates Pancasila as the basis of the Indonesian state, therefore corruption must be subject to appropriate sanctions or punishments for using people’s money arbitrarily (personal interests). Pancasila in Indonesia plays an important role in people's lives, starting from the rights and obligations regulated in Pancasila.

Keywords

Pancasila; Education; Corruption; Moral Character

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ddick, Howard and Jeremy Mulholland. (2016). The Politics of Corruption in Indonesia. Georgetown University Press Vol 17.

Dwiputrianti, Septiana. (2009). Memahami Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi 6 (3).

Hardjaloka, Loura. (2014). Studi Penerapan E-Goverment Di Indonesia Dan Negara Lainnya Sebagai Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Sektor Publik. Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaaan Hukum Nasional 3 (3), 435-362.

King, Dwight Y. (2000). Corruption in Indonesia: A curable Cancer?. Journal of International Affarairs Vol.53.

Kuncoro, ari. (2006). Corruption and Bussiness uncertainly in Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 11-30.

Kurniawan, Teguh. (2011). Peranan Akuntabilitas Publik Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Pemerintahan. Bisnis & Birokrasi Jurnal.

Muhtar, Sutaryo, Sriyanto. (2018). Corruption in Indonesian Local Goverment: Study on Triangle Fraud Theory. International Journal of Bussines and Society Vol. 19 No. 2

Narmoadmojo, Winarno. (2013). Pancasila & UUD NRI 1945. Ombak.

Noerlina, LA Wulandhari, Sasmoko, dkk. (2016). Corruption Cases Maping Based on Indonesia’s Corruption Perception Index. Jurnal of Physics: Conference Series.

Nugroho, Hibnu. (2013). Efektivitas Fungsi Koordinasi Dan Supervisi Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasn Korupsi. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 13 (3), 392-401.

Pimpinan MPR. (2012). Empat Pilar kehidupan Berbangsa dan bernegara. Sekertariat Jendral MPR RI.

Prabowo, Hendi Yogi. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt : Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indomesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control 17 (3) 306-326.

Putra, Nusa. (2017). Politik, Kekuasaan Dan Korupsi. Murai Kencana.

Ridwan. (2014). Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Peran Serta Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum No. 67.

Rini & L. Damiyati. (2017). Analisi Hasil Audi Pemerintahan Dan Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintahan Provinsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akutansi Dan Bisnis 4 (1), 73-90.

Rochman, Meuthia Ganie, Rochman Achwan. (2016). Corruption in Indonesia’s Emerging Democracy. Sage Journals.

Sina, La. (2009) . Dampak dan Upaya Pemberantasan serta pengawasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal hukum pro Justitia 26 (1).

Sulasmono, Bambang Suteng. (2010). Dasar Negara Pancasila.

Supeno, Hadi (2015). Korupsi Di Daerah. Total Media.

Syamsudin, Muhammad. (2009). Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Budaya Hukum. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UII 30 (64).

Ubaedillah. (2016). Pancasila Demokrasi Dan Pencegahan Korupsi. Civic Education.

Willy, D.S . Negara Hukum Dalam Keadaan Pengecualian.

Znoj, Heinzpeter. (2017). Deep Corruption in Indonesia: Discourses, practices, histories. Corruption and the secret of law 53-74.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Catleya Azka Aninda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License