Settlement of Debtors in Default in Credit Agreements with Movable Property Guarantees
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
Abstract
An agreement between two or more people is referred to as an agreement. Agreement is something that often happens in society. There are various types of agreements, one of which is a credit agreement, this credit agreement can occur between a debtor and a creditor so as to create a debt-debt relationship, where the debtor is obliged to repay the loan granted by the creditor, based on the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. However, sometimes there are conditions where the debtor cannot carry out the obligations specified in the agreement so that collateral is needed in this case movable objects. This article aims to discuss the settlement if the debtor defaults in the credit agreement by using movable objects as collateral. And the method used in this article is a qualitative descriptive method with a normative juridical approach. The results of the discussion on the settlement of defaulting debtors in credit agreements with movable property guarantees, namely through litigation in the form of filing a lawsuit to the district court in accordance with the provisions of civil procedural law, or requests for execution and settlement through the state receivables affairs committee for loans involving state assets or through non-litigation, namely settlement of legal cases carried out outside the court such as mediation, consultation, negotiation, and conciliation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan
KUHPerdata Pasal 509-511 tentang Kebendaan Bergerak
KUHPerdata Pasal 1238 tentang Perikatan untuk Memberikan Sesuatu
KUHPerdata Pasal 1313 tentang Perjanjian
KUHPerdata Pasal 1320 tentang Syarat Sahnya Suatu Perjanjian
KUHPerdata Pasal 1338 tentang Akibat Suatu Perjanjian
Buku dan Jurnal
Advendi, S., & Sari, E. (2008). Hukum dalam Ekonomi (2nd ed.). Gramedia Widyasarana Indonesia.
Artha Windari, R. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian (p. 2). Graha Ilmu.
Hermansyah, H. (2005). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Latifiani, D. (2015). Permasalahan Pelaksanan Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 1(1).
Muhammad, N. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata (p. 89). Djambatan.
Nugroho, & Susanti. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Prenada Media.
Raharjo, H. (2009). Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia. Pustaka Yustisi.
Salami, & Rahadi. (2013). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Transaksi Elektronik (E-Commerce). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(1).
Salim. (2017). Hukum Jaminan (p. 21). Rajawali.
Sarwono. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Praktik (pp. 152–153). Sinar Grafika.
Subekti, S. (n.d.). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata (pp. 61–62). Intermasa.
Suyatno, T. dkk. (n.d.). Dasar-Dasar Perkreditan. Gramedia.
Widjaya, G., & Yani, A. (2011). Jaminan Fidusia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yahman. (2014). Karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan. Pranadamedia Group.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aulia Maharani, Ahmad Khoirul Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License