Simulasi Pencahayaan Buatan untuk Ruang Kelas dengan Tipe Armature TL LED dan Bohlam LED

Arimaz Hangga(1), Alim Muanifatin Nisa(2), Dewangga Pratama(3), Muchlisin Apriliyanto(4),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jte.v11i2.26902


(1) Jurusan Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Jurusan Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Jurusan Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(4) Jurusan Teknik Elektro, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Classroom light intensity is one of the essential factors in the learning process. Several factors affect light intensity in the classroom, i.e., determination of classroom design, position of objects in the classroom, window design, shading devices, type of lamp, and type of lamp armature. The research aims to determine the effect of armature lamp type. The results of this research are expected to increase the efficiency of electricity costs and use the classroom optimal lighting system according to Indonesian National Standard (SNI). Two types of lamp armature used in this research i.e. LED tube armature and LED bulb armature. This research used E11-210 classroom in E11 Building of Electrical Engineering Department, Universitas Negeri Semarang with the size of 12m x 9m x 3.5m. Simulation in this research used Dialux Evo 9 software. The results of observations and simulations show that E11-210 classroom had not followed SNI yet, in 350 lux. Based on simulation results, it shows that using LED tube armature and LED bulb armature will get light intensity of E11-210 classroom that follow SNI 6197:2011. Simulation results show that the use of LED tube armature (Powerbalance Gen2 RC463B) in E11-210 classroom will increase efficiency of electricity costs by 27.81%. Meanwhile, the use of LED bulb armature (Luxspace Ace Acccent RS750B) in E11-210 classroom will increase efficiency of electricity costs by 33.96%.

Keywords

LED tube armature; LED bulb armature; efficiency of electricity costs; SNI

Full Text:

PDF

References

Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Statistik Ketenagalistrikan 2017, Jakarta, 2017.

Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral, Keputusan Menteri ESDM tentang Rencana Umum Ketenagalistrikan Nasional 2008 s.d. 2027, 2008.

E. Ghisi, T. C. Stahnke Manorov, L. Niehuns Antunes, and L. Padilha Thives, “Electricity Savings Due to the Replacement of Fluorescent Lamps with LEDs in Classrooms,†Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 64–74, 2019.

T. Tejwani, R. Chikhalikar, and Siddhartha, “Energy Conservation in an Educational Institution - Through Lighting Optimization Techniques,†in 2019 Innov. Power Adv. Comput. Technol, pp. 1–7, 2019.

L. T. Doulos, A. Kontadakis, E. N. Madias, M. Sinou, and A. Tsangrassoulis, “Minimizing energy consumption for artificial lighting in a typical classroom of a Hellenic public school aiming for near Zero Energy Building using LED DC luminaires and daylight harvesting systems,†Energy Build., vol. 194, pp. 201–217, 2019.

M. Fontoynont, “LED lighting , ultra-low-power lighting schemes for new lighting applications,†Comptes Rendus Phys., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 159–168, 2018.

D. . Erhat, M. Haag, A. Schmitt, D. Guerlich, M. Bonomolo, and U. Eickr, “Retrofitting Existing University Campus Buildings to Improve Sustainability and Energy performance†in Proc PLEA 2016, pp. 1–8, 2016.

M. Bonomolo, C. Baglivoa, G. Bianco, P. M. Congedo, and M. Beccali, “Cost optimal analysis of lighting retrofit scenarios in educational buildings in Italy,†Energy Procedia, vol. 126, pp. 171–178, 2017.

M. F. Lee and N. Q. Zulkafli, “A Case Study on Energy Saving Through Lighting System for Building: An Internal Energy Review,†in 2016 IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Power Energy, Conf. Proceeding, pp. 575–579, 2016.

B. Stankovic, A. Kostic, and M. J. Popovic, “Energy for Sustainable Development Analysis and comparison of lighting design criteria in green building certi fi cation systems — Guidelines for application in Serbian building practice,†Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 19, pp. 56–65, 2014.

M. Petkovic, D. Bajovic, D. Vukobratovic, G. McCutcheon, L. Stankovic, and V. Stankovic, “Effect of external daylight in smart dimmable LED lighting systems,†in Proc WOCC 2019 - Proceedings, 2019, pp. 1–5.

L. L. Fernandes, E. S. Lee, D. L. Dibartolomeo, and A. Mcneil, “Monitored lighting energy savings from dimmable lighting controls in The New York Times Headquarters Building,†Energy Build., vol. 68, no. Part A, pp. 498–514, 2014.

M. S. S. Purnama and D. Sutanto, “Dynamic facade module prototype development for solar radiation prevention in high rise building,†in IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., 2018.

A. A. Freewan and L. W. Shqra, “Analysis of energy and daylight performance of adjustable shading devices in region with hot summer and cold winter,†Adv. Energy Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 289–304, 2017.

A. Cilasun, “Using Daylight Systems To Reduce Energy Consumption Due To Lighting: A Case Study Of Yaşar University Cafeteria,†Assoc. Build. Phys., p. 10, 2016.

A. Tsangrassoulis, A. Kontadakis, and L. Doulos, “Assessing Lighting Energy Saving Potential from Daylight Harvesting in Office Buildings Based on Code Compliance & Simulation Techniques : A Comparison,†Procedia Environ. Sci., vol. 38, pp. 420–427, 2017.

N. Giraldo, M. Longhinotti, F. O. R. Pereira, and A. Kuhnen, “Luminous and visual preferences of young children in their classrooms : Curtain use , artificial lighting and window views,†Build. Environ., vol. 152, pp. 59–73, 2015.

N. Castilla, C. Llinares, and F. Bisegna, “Emotional evaluation of lighting in university classrooms : A preliminary study,†Front. Archit. Res., 2018.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 16-0762-2004 tentang Pengukuran intensitas penerangan di tempat kerja. 2004.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional, SNI 6197: 2011 tentang Konservasi energi pada sistem pencahayaan. 2011.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share