Performance Indicators of Basic Infrastructure of Kotaku Program (The City without Slums)

Awliya Tribhuwana(1), Ohan Farhan(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jtsp.v22i2.24011


(1) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon
(2) Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon

Abstract

Abstract. Wotgali Village is a slum area. The aim of the current research is to find out the performance of slum base infrastructure using Lakip (Government Agency Accountability Report) of KOTAKU (City without Slums) Program. The first step was performed by identifying the initial settlement (base line), then some treatments on the facilities and infrastructure (finish line), performance evaluation stages of the preparation, planning, implementation, and sustainability stages. The research used qualitative and quantitative approach. Qualitative measurement began with a numerical assessment of the results on the level of regional slum. In addition, quantitative data used the Lakip simulation using results of the KOTAKU program stage performance. Results of the initial condition reach value of 32%. It is categorized as slight slums with an average sectoral slum of 36.68%. Basic infrastructure development which has final technical reached 24% and is included in slight slum with an average sectoral of 27.50%. The performance of LAKIP Kotaku was in preparation phase 90.46% (very good performance), planning stage was 89.93% (very good performance), implementation stage was 90.25% (very good performance), sustainability stage was 85.21% (better performance). Thus, the achievement of KOTAKU program is 85.19% with a range of value of 80-90. The value is included as better performance result. Results of the analysis can be concluded that level of slum can be reduced to 19% (not slum) by creating some improvements to basic facilities and infrastructure. In the following year, involving Lakip Performance, the planning stage can be enhanced through community participation and active involvement.

Keywords

Program; performance indicators; simulation; development benefits

Full Text:

PDF

References

V. Kusumawardhani, S. H. Sutjahjo, and I. K. Dewi, “Penyediaan Perumahan Dan Infrastruktur Dasar Di Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh Perkotaan (Studi Kasus Di Kota Bandung),†NALARs, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 13, 2016, doi: 10.24853/nalars.15.1.13-24.

E. Oktaviansyah, “Penataan Permukiman Kumuh Rawan Bencana Kebakaran Di Kelurahan Lingkas Ujung Kota Tarakan,†Penataan Permukim. Kumuh Rawan Bencana Kebakaran Di Kelurahan Lingkas Ujung Kota Tarakan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2012, doi: 10.15294/jtsp.v14i2.7093.

A. Taveriyanto, “Perumahan Tepi kota Semarang,†no. 024, pp. 97–106, 2004.

W. I. Ervianto, “Pengelolaan Permukiman Kumuh Berkelanjutan Di Perkotaan,†J. Spektran, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 178–186, 2019.

M. D. Bainamus et al., “ Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor ( Studi Kasus : Kelurahan Kota Bengkulu ),†vol. IV, pp. 61–71, 2019.

A. S. Wimardana, “Faktor Prioritas Penyebab Kumuh Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kelurahan Belitung Selatan Kota Banjarmasin,†J. Tek. ITS, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v5i2.18386.

A. Annisa Amalia, “Karakteristik Hunian Permukiman Kumuh Kampung Sapiria Kelurahan Lembo Kota Makassar,†Nat. Natl. Acad. J. Archit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2018, doi: 10.24252/nature.v5i1a2.

A. C. Permata Sari, “Analisis Implementasi Pembangunan Partisipatif dalam Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh ( KOTAKU ) Studi Komparatif : Desa Bligo Kecamatan Candi dan Desa Jiken, Kecamatan Tulangan, Kabupaten Sidoarjo, Jawa Timur,†Equilib. J. Ekon., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 57, 2018, doi: 10.30742/equilibrium.v14i2.452.

N. Nafsi, Aspin, Santi, and S. Belinda, “ Karakteristik Permukiman Kumuh ( Studi Kasus Kecamatan Semarang Utara Kota Semarang ) Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik – Universitas Halu Oleo Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik – Universitas Halu Oleo,†J. Planol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2019.

Rajagukguk, “Pengaruh Perilaku OrganisasPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh perilaku organisasi (perilaku individu, perilaku kelompok, sistemorganisasi) terhadap prestasi karyawan pada PT. Perkebunan Nusantara II (persi terhadap Prestasi Karyawan pada P,†J. Ilm. Methonomi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 124–137, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/197040-ID-pengaruh-perilaku-organisasi-terhadap-pr.pdf.

T. Ismail et al., “Hubungan Strategi Dan Kinerja,†vol. XIX, no. 01, pp. 129–143, 2015.

“Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia Jakarta , 2003,†2003.

E. Supardi, “Pengembangan Karir Kontribusinya Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai,†J. Geogr. Gea, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.17509/gea.v9i1.1680.

Nurhayati, “ Membangun Kinerja Melalui Pengembangan Komitmen Guru di Kota Semaran ", Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang,†pp. 1–21, 2011.

R. N. I. Sari and H. S. Hadijah, “Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja,†J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 204, 2016, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3389.

M. Ahyaruddin and M. F. Amrillah, “Faktor Penentu Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah,†J. Akunt. Multiparadigma, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 471–486, 2018, doi: 10.18202/jamal.2018.04.9028.

A. A. Lambajang, D. P. E. Saerang, and J. Morasa, “Pengaruh Pengetahuan Tentang Anggaran, Partisipasi Masyarakat, Transparansi Kebijakan Publik, Dan Akuntabilitas Publik Terhadap Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah Pada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah di Wilayah Sulawesi Utara,†J. Ris. Akunt. Dan Audit. “Goodwill,†vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 104–117, 2018, doi: 10.35800/jjs.v9i1.19630.

S. B. Raharjo, “Evaluasi Trend Kualitas Pendidikan Di Indonesia,†J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 511–532, 2013, doi: 10.21831/pep.v16i2.1129.

Samsuni, “Penulis adalah Kasubbag Keuangan pada Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. 113,†Manaj. Sumber Daya Mns., vol. 17 no 31, no. 31, pp. 113–124, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.staialfalahbjb.ac.id/index.php/alfalahjikk/article/view/19.

Dr. Dedi Rianto Rahadi, Manajemen Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, vol. 78, no. 3. 2004.

E. Khumaedi, “Pengaruh Disiplin Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Sentra Operasi Terminal Pt.Angkasa Pura Ii,†J. Ilm. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 486–497, 2016, doi: 10.22441/jimb.v2i1.3691.

I. K. Hayati, “Analisis Penerapan Quality of Work Life ( Qwl ) Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan,†Manaj. Ind. Telekomun. Bogor, pp. 545–553, 2011.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share