OVERURBANIZATION IN SEMARANG CITY

Saratri Wilonoyudho(1),


(1) Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Abstract

The economic growth in Semarang has resulted in bad impact of degradation the environment, traffic jams, increasing informal sectors and unemployment, crimes, and various social-politic conflicts. From this phenomenon, it is suspected that Semarang is undergoing overurbanization, that is the imbalance between population and economic growth.           From the result of research, it can be concluded that the main determinant of urbanization process in Semarang is the prolonged capitalization from colonial era. However, it not industrialization that develops, but informal sectors and service sectors. The impact is the city involution because as if the new employees can never participate in informal sectors. As a result, the Semarang City Government must mobilize non-producing resources to finance creating and organizing the needed service for high concentration of population under low standard of industrialization. In other words, Semarang and the hinterland are indeed undergoing “de-industrialization”. Industrial and agricultural sectors decreases their role, and on the other hand the service sector increases. In those areas, urbanization tends to occur with a spreading pattern characterized by high rate of population in urban areas like in regencies surrounding Semarang. The economic growth in those areas does not depend on the core city, Semarang, so that the level of advanced primate city has been passed through. The suggestions proposed are that the megapolitan issues has been reached, thus the things that need to consider in megaregional tendency. The regencies in the hinterland are proven “to balance’ the global capitalism, apart from wether the growth of enterpreunership innovation is accompanied by significant increase of welfare. This means that things need further attention is to manage the relationship between locality and production system and global economic in those ares to make people welfare and prevent people to migrate to other big cities.

 

Keywords

overurbanization; Semarang City; megapolitan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Brannen, J. 1997. “Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif”. Terjemahan Nuktah Arfawie Kurde, Imam Syafei, Noorhadi AH. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Douglass, M. 1995.”Global Interdependence and Urbanization : Planning for the Bangkok Megaurban Regions” in

McGee,T.G and I.M.Robinson (eds). The Megaurban Regions of Southeast Asia. Vancouver, the University of British Columbia Press pp. 45-77

---------------, 2000. “Megaurban Regions and World City Formation : Globalization, the Economic Crisis and Urban Policy Issues in Asia Pasific. Urban Studies 37 (12). Pp. 15-36

Firman, Tommy. 2003. “The Spatial Pattern of Population Growth in Java, Indonesia 1990-2000 : Continuity and Change in Extended Metropolitan Region Formation”. The Fifth IRSA International Conference. Bandung 18-19 July

Ginsburg,N. 1990. The Urban Transition : Reflections on the American and Asian Experiences, Hongkong : The Chinese University Press

Gugler,Josef. 1982. “Overurbanization Reconsidered”.EconomicDevelopment and Cultural Change. Vol.30. pp. 173-189

Jampaklay, Aree, Kim Korinek, and Barbara Entwisle. 2007. “Residential Clustering Among Nang Rong Migrants in Urban Settings of Thailand”.Asian and Pacific Migration Journal. Vol. 16. No.4. pp 485-510

Kaiser,E.J. 1995. Urban and Landuse Planning. Chicago : University of Illinois Press

Keban, Yeremias, T. 1995. “Migrasi Internasional : Kecenderungan, Determinan, Dampak dan Kebijakan”. Kertas Kerja Pelatihan Mobilitas Penduduk Tanggal 11 – 23 Desember 1995 di Pusat Penelitian Kependudukan UGM

Latz,G. 1991. “The Persistence of Agriculture in Urban Japan : An Analysis of the Tokyo Metropolitan Area” in N.Ginsburg,

Light, Ivan. 2001. ”Globalization, Transnationalism, and Trade” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal. Vol. 10No. 1. pp. 53-79

Lin,G.C.S. 1994. “Changing Theoritical Perspective on Urbanization in Asian Developing Countries”.Third World Planning Review 16. pp. 1-23

Manning, Chris, Tadjuddin Noer Effendi. 1985. Urbanisasi, Pengangguran dan Sektor Informal. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia

McGee, Terry. 1971. The Urbanization Process in the Third World Exploration In Search of Theory. London : G.Bell and Son Ltd

-----------------.1991. “The Emergence of Desa Kota Regions in Asia”. Dalam N.Ginsburg,

Miles,Mattew B and Huberman Michael. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif (Qualitative Data Analysis). Jakarta : UI Press

Nasikun. 1980. ”Urbanisai Berlebih, Involusi Perkotaan dan Radikalisme Politik

Di Negara-negara Berkembang”, Prisma No.6 Juni. hal. 9-22

Nasution. 1988. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung : Tarsito

Schwab.WA. 1982.Urban Sociology : a Human Ecological Perspective. S.l. : Addison-Wesley

Sovani,N.V. 1964.”The Analysis of ‘Overurbanization’”. Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol.12.No.2. pp.113-122

Todaro, Michael P and Jerry Stilkind. 1981. The Urbanization Dilemma. New York :The Population Council

-----------------------. 1981. City Bias and Rural Neglect : The Dilemma of Urban Development. New York : The Population Council

Tyner, James A. 2002. ”The Globalization of Transnational Labor Migration and the Filipino Family : A Narrative”. Asian and Pacific Migration. Journal. Vol. 11 No. 1. Pp. 95-116

Yeates,Maurice and Garner, Barry. 1980. The North American City. San Francisco : Harper and Row Publisher

Yixing,Z. 1991. “The Metropolitan Interlocking Region in China : A Preliminary Hypothesis “in N.Ginsburg,

Yunus, Hadi Sabari. 2007. Megapolitan : Konsep, Problematikanya dan Prospek. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

Zoer`aini. 1997.Tantangan Lingkungan dan Landskap Hutan Kota. Jakarta : Pustaka Cidesendo

References from State Document

Badan Pusat Statistik. 1982-2010.Indonesian Population Cencus

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.