The Development Of Computer Aided Design Learning Model In Civil Engineering Vocational Education Study Program In Universitas Negeri Semarang

Triono Subagio(1), Nur Qudus(2), Rodia Syamwil(3),


(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

Computer Aided Design (CAD) learning model in the Civil Engineering Vocational Education program in Universitas Negeri Semarang, especially 2-dimensional modeling, continues to be developed so that learning outcomes are accepted by the standards the business / construction services industry. Development of learning outcomes is inseparable from efforts to develop learning model that is used during the learning process. The development of learning models in this study focused on the development of learning methods, learning materials and CAD learning evaluation techniques. This study used the research and development using the Dick and Carrey design. The research sample was 34 students who took Computer Graphic course. The results showed that the three aspects: the development of methods, the development of teaching materials and materials and the development of evaluation techniques were categorized as excellent and very excellent. The CAD learning method was very suitable to be developed through conceptual learning methods, direct practice learning and case study learning. The use of this method was based on the needs faced in the classroom (situational). This means that the use of this method could be used at once, or varied according to the condition in the class. The use of learning equipment is one of the keys for successful learning development. The learning equipment developed in this study included the use of hand-outs, modules and supplements. The use of all three was very successful to support optimal learning outcomes. The use of all three was also aimed to facilitate the diverse learning needs of students. The development of evaluation techniques in learning included three domains: cognitive, psychomotor and affective domain. The cognitive domain was divided into two aspects: construction knowledge and the use of software. The development of evaluation techniques showed that the ability of students in each domain was in the excellent and very excellent category.

Keywords

Development, learning model, CAD cognition

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. 2001. The taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. New York – Addison Wesley Longman

Becker, K. 1991. Content and Strategies for Teaching Computer Aided Drafting [Versi elektronik]. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 28, 38 – 46. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ete_facpub/11/

Bhavnani, S. K. 2000. Design conductive to the use of efficient strategies. Proceeding of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems : processes, practices, methods and techniques, 338 – 345

Bhavnani, S. K., John., B. E., & Flemming, U. 1999. The strategic use of CAD : an empirically inspired, theory-based course. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=303036

Dick and Carey. Learner and Context Analysis. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Juli 2012 dari http://www.itma.vt.edu/modules/spring03/instrdes/lesson5.htm

Djemari Mardapi. 2005. Rekayasa sistem penilaian dalam rangka meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Hepi

Edia Rahayuningsih & Djoko Dwiyanto. (Eds). 2005. Pembelajaran di laboratorium. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. 1992. Principles of instructional design. USA : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publisher.

Inchaurrehui, J. 2009. CAD 123 – Instructional Multimedia for CAD. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://www.csun.edu/~ji687095/Masters/Reflections/CAD%20123.pdf

Jogiyanto H. M. 2006. Filosofi, pendekatan dan penerapan pembelajaran metode kasus untuk mahasiswa dan dosen. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi

Johnson, M., Ozturk, E., Yalvac, B., & Peng, X. 2012. Assessing an adaptive expertise instrument in computer-aided design (CAD) courses at two campusses. Diambil pada tanggal 30 September 2012 dari http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/3927/view

Kirkpatrick, D. 2006. Evluating Training Program. San Francisco : CA. Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc.

Lawler, T. Explorations into “bottom-up†strategies for the teaching of computer aided design. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT11/Lawlerdef.pdf

Menary, G. H., Robinson, T. T. Novel approaches for teaching and assessing CAD. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2011/papers/icee2011_submission_228.pdf

Mills, J.E., & Treagust, D. F. 2003. Engineering education – Is problem based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Diambil pada tanggal 24 Maret 2007, dari http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf

Muhibbin Syah. 2008. Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru, Bandung – PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Nana Sudjana. 2009, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung – PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Nancy Yen-Wen Cheng. 1997. Teaching CAD with Language Learning Methods to Teach Computer-Aided Design (CAD). Proceeding of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Archtecture (ACADIA), Ohio, 1 – 19

Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russel, J. D. 2000. Intructional technology for teaching and learning, Ohio – Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall

Paliokas, I. 2009. Reinforcing Metacognition in CAD Education using Videotutorials. Computer-Aided Design and Applications Journal, 6 (5), 613 – 623

Reece, I. & Wlaker, S. 1997. Teaching, training and learning. Durham : Bussiness Education Publisher

Reffold, C. N. 1998. Teaching and learning coputer-aided engineering drawing. International Journal Engineering, 4, 276 – 281.

Winn, D., & Banks, F. 2012. CAD and creativity : a new pedagogy. Diambil pada tanggal 30 Agustus 2012, dari http://www.liu.se/cetis/patt2012/index.html

Wrench, J. S., Richmond, V. P. & Gorhan, J. 2001. Affect : Communication, affect and learning in the classroom. California..

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PASCASARJANA UNNES,
Gedung A Kampus Kelud, Semarang 50233
Telp. +62248440516, +62248449017
Faks. +62248449969
Website: http://pps.unnes.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN 2339-0344. e-ISSN 2503-2305