The Realization of Directive Speech Act by Da’i on Dialogic Da’wah in Kota Surakarta: A Socio-Pragmatic Study

Miftah nugroho(1), Dwi Purnanto(2), Sri Samiati Tarjana(3),


(1) Sebelas Maret University
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Mare

Abstract

This article aims at explaining the directive speech acts realization on Q&A sessions of a dialogic situated communication. The directive speech requires a communicative counterpart (to do something as the speaker’s wishes) by his/her words. Under the Sociopragmatic is the crossdisciple study between the pragmatic and sociological disciplines. The data were obtained by applying methods of observation and recording. The data source of this study took the Islamic liturgical dialogues dakwah held by both Islamic organizations and Islamic sermons held at schools, homes, or mosques. The result shows that, in terms of the communicative functions, the directive speech acts were realized from the acts of suggesting, and warning, a da’i or preachers are adhering to the principle of harmony as reflected from their commitment towards the observed maxims of kurmat, andhap asor and the tepa slilra.

Keywords

directive; speech acts; dai/preacher; the harmonious principle

Full Text:

PDF

References

Austin, John. L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford Mass: Oxford University Press.

Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “Perspectives on Politeness” dalam Shoshana Blum-Kulka and Gabriele Kasper Journal of Pragmatics 14. North Holland – Amsterdam. hlm 219 – 236

Gunarwan, Asim. 2000. “Tindak Tutur Melarang di Kalangan Dua Kelompok Etnis Indonesia: Ke Arah Kajian Etnopragmatik” dalam PELLBA 13. Jakarta: Unika Atma Jaya.

Gunarwan, Asim. 2005. “Beberapa Prinsip dalam Komunikasi Verbal: Tinjauan Sosiolinguistik dan Pragmatik” dalam Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. The Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Limited.

Moliong, Lexy J. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: Rosda.

Searle, J.R. 1971. The Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Searle, John R. 1979. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts” dalam A.P. Martinich (ed). 1996. The Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.6.

Searle, John R. dan Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundation of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. 1988. Metode Linguistik Bagian Pertama ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik Yogykarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Žegarac, Vladimir. 2008. “Culture and Communication” dalam Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed). Culturally Speaking Culture, Communication, Politeness Theory. Second edition. Continuum International Publishing Group. hlm. 48 – 70

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.