Gejayan Memanggil: Social Solidarity in the Social Movement of the Digital Age

Biko Nabih Fikri Zufar(1), Sinergy Aditya Airlangga(2),

(1) Gadjah Mada University
(2) Gadjah Mada University


Many things change in society as a result of being influenced by technology, one of which is social movements. Increasingly sophisticated technology can drive or present social movements in society. Based on these conditions, this article examines the existence of technology that can produce a social movement in society. In addition, this article uses social solidarity theory; mechanical and organic Durkheim, with a view to seeing the solidarity that appears in social movements in the digital era. This article uses a qualitative research method with a narrative research approach. The result is that social movements in the digital era only prioritize mechanical solidarity, without ensuring equal distribution of awareness of the individuals or groups involved. On the other hand, a social movement in the digital era requires organic solidarity to be able to maximize the goals of social movements.


social movements; social solidarity; technology; cyber sociology; gejayan memanggil


Amri, D. and Himawan, F. U. (2020) Demo tolak Omnibus Law di berbagai kota berakhir ricuh, lebih dari seribu orang ditangkap polisi, BBC.

Bradshaw, S. and Howard, P. N. (2019) The Global Disinformation Disorder: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford.

Brunsting, S. and Postmes, T. (2002) ‘Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age: Predicting Offline and Online Collective Action’, Small Group Research. SAGE Publications Inc, 33(5), pp. 525–554. doi: 10.1177/104649602237169.

Durkheim, E. (1960) The Division of Labor In Society. New York: Noble Offset Printers, Inc. (2020) Demo ‘Black Lives Matter’ di Seluruh Penjuru Dunia.

Earl, J. and Kimport, K. (2009) ‘Movement Societies and Digital Protest: Fan Activism and Other Nonpolitical Protest Online’, Sociological Theory. [American Sociological Association, Wiley, Sage Publications, Inc.], 27(3), pp. 220–243. Available at:


Fitzsimmons, R. and Suoranta, J. (2020) ‘Lenin on Learning and the Development of Revolutionary Consciousness’.

Fuchs, C. (2017) Social Media: A Critical Introduction. 2nd edn. London: Sage.

Herzog, L. (2018) ‘Durkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from “Organic Solidarityâ€â€™, American Political Science Review. 2017/11/07. Cambridge University Press, 112(1), pp. 112–124. doi: DOI: 10.1017/S000305541700048X.

Hirsch, E. L. (1986) ‘The Creation of Political Solidarity in Social Movement Organizations’, The Sociological Quarterly. [Midwest Sociological Society, Wiley], 27(3), pp. 373–387. Available at:

Hunt, S. A., Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. (1994) ‘Identity Fields’:, in Laraña, E., Johnston, H., and Gusfield, J. R. (eds) New Social Movements. Temple University Press (From Ideology to Identity), pp. 185–208. Available at:

Inda, G. A. (2019) ‘Under the Empire of Spontaneous Solidarity: State and Political Action in the Theoretical Durkheimian Project (1892-1893)’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39, pp. 65–84. doi:

Irwan, I. et al. (2019) ‘Strengthening the Solidarity Through Social Media Networks in Communities at the Ciliwung Riverbank’, KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture; Vol 11, No 2 (2019): SeptemberDO - 10.15294/komunitas.v11i2.20606 . Available at:

Iswara, A. J. (2020) 5 Negara Dilanda Demo Besar, Termasuk Tolak UU Cipta Kerja di Indonesia, Available at: (Accessed: 18 March 2021).

Kasra, M. (2017) ‘Vigilantism, public shaming, and social media hegemony: The role of digital-networked images in humiliation and sociopolitical control’, The Communication Review. Routledge, 20(3), pp. 172–188. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2017.1343068.

Krylova, A. (2003) ‘Beyond the Spontaneity-Consciousness Paradigm: “Class Instinct†as a Promising Category of Historical Analysis’, Slavic Review. 2017/01/27. Cambridge University Press, 62(1), pp. 1–23. doi: DOI: 10.2307/3090463.

Laaksonen, S.-M. and Porttikivi, M. (2021) ‘Governing with conversation culture – conditioning organizational interaction in a digital social movement’, Information, Communication & Society. Routledge, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2021.1873401.

Lampito, O. (1998) Lengser Keprabon: Dokumen Reformasi. Yogyakarta: Grafika Wangsa Bakti.

Laucuka, A. (2018) ‘Communicative Functions of Hashtags’, Economics and Culture, 15, pp. 56–62. doi: 10.2478/jec-2018-0006.

Leong, C. et al. (2020) ‘Digital organizing of a global social movement: From connective to collective action’, Information and Organization, 30(4), p. 100324. doi:


Lukes, S. (1985) Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Available at:

Marske, C. E. (1987) ‘Durkheim’s “Cult of the Individual†and the Moral Reconstitution of Society’, Sociological Theory. [American Sociological Association, Wiley, Sage Publications, Inc.], 5(1), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.2307/201987.

Moyo, L. (2009) ‘Repression, Propaganda, and Digital Resistance: New Media and Democracy in Zimbabwe’, in Mudhai, O. F., Tettey, W. J., and Banda, F. (eds) African Media and the Digital Public Sphere. Palgrave M. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 57–71. doi:

Ollerenshaw, J. A. and Creswell, J. W. (2002) ‘Narrative Research: A Comparison of Two Restorying Data Analysis Approaches’, Qualitative Inquiry. SAGE Publications Inc, 8(3), pp. 329–347. doi: 10.1177/10778004008003008.

Prastika, A. C. and Widhyharto, R. D. S. (2017) Gerakan Sosial Baru di Dunia Siber. Etnografi Online Media Sosial dalam Akun Twitter dan Halaman Facebook Gerakan Jogja Darurat Agraria. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Putsanra, D. V. (2019) Demo Jogja Gejayan Memanggil 2, Mahasiswa Mulai Kumpul di UIN,

Rho, E. H. R. and Mazmanian, M. (2020) ‘Political Hashtags & the Lost Art of Democratic Discourse’, Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Ritzer, G. (1998) ‘Emile Durkheim’, in Smith, M. E. G. (ed.) Early Modern Social Theory: Selected Interpretive Readings. 0 edn. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press, pp. 110–151.

Saputra, A. A. W. (2012) Peranan Mahasiswa Yogyakarta Dalam Perjuangan Reformasi di Indonesia (1998). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Schradie, J. (2018) ‘Moral Monday Is More Than a Hashtag: The Strong Ties of Social Movement Emergence in the Digital Era’, Social Media + Society. SAGE Publications Ltd, 4(1), p. 2056305117750719. doi: 10.1177/2056305117750719.

Segre, S. (2016) ‘A Durkheimian Theory of Social Movements’, International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4. doi: 10.11114/ijsss.v4i10.1857.

Selander, L. and Jarvenpaa, S. (2016) ‘Digital Action Repertoires and Transforming a Social Movement Organization’, MIS Q., 40, pp. 331–352.

Shepherd, J. (2004) ‘What is the Digital Era?’, in Social and Economic Transformation in the Digital Era. IGI Global, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59140-158-2.ch001.

Snow, D. A. and McAdam, D. (2000) ‘Identity work processes in the context of social movements: Clarifying the identity/movement nexus.’, Self, identity, and social movements. Minneapolis, MN, US: University of Minnesota Press (Social movements, protest, and contention; v. 13.), pp. 41–67.

Stalder, F. (2013) Digital Solidarity, Cartografias. Berlin: Mute Books & PML Books. Available at:

Tilly, C. (1981) As sociology meets history. New York: Academic Press.

Turner, E. (2013) ‘New Movements, Digital Revolution, and Social Movement Theory’, Peace Review. Routledge, 25(3), pp. 376–383. doi: 10.1080/10402659.2013.816562.

Villi, M. and Matikainen, J. (2016) ‘Participation in Social Media: Studying Explicit and Implicit Forms of Participation in Communicative Social Networks’, Media and Communication, 4, p. 109. doi: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.578.

VSNU (2016) Digital Society. Den Haag. Available at:

Zamroni, A. and Andin, M. (1998) Pahlawan Reformasi: Catatan Peristiwa 12 Mei 1998. Jakarta: Pabelan Jayakarta.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.