Institutional Membership and Rural Development in Indonesia: Case Study of Three Villages in Purbalingga

Sutiyo Sutiyo(1), Ismail Nurdin(2),

(1) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN)
(2) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN)


This study aims to measure community membership in rural institution and analyze its benefits in rural development after Indonesian decentralization. To do so, a case study was conducted in Serang, Kedarpan and Sumilir village of Purbalingga District, Central Java Province. Respondents of this study consist of 232 people, and data are analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Findings of this study present that diverse community groups exist, and most households become active members in one to two rural institutions. Neighbourhood, religious and farmer groups are the most active institutions in term of membership and carrying periodic meeting. Membership in rural institutions improves access to financial, physical and natural capital, but less in improving human capital. While most villagers are member of neighbourhood, farmer and religious groups, the village government does not build intensive interaction with these institutions in meetings to formulate village decision. Thus, the empowerment process is not optimally delivered, and the institutions cannot optimally help their members in addressing their livelihood problems. Some initiatives are performed by the institutions, but without government support, they result only limited benefits for the members. Thus, this study recommends the government to involve more institutions in village decision making, especially by improving the participation of neighbourhood, religious and farmer groups.


rural institution; institutional membership; rural development

Full Text:



Alatas, Vivi, Pritchett, Lant, and Anna Wetterberg. 2005. Voice Lessons: Local Government Organizations, Social Organizations and the Quality of Local Governance. Jakarta: The World Bank Indonesia.

Antlöv, Hans. 2003. “Village Government and Rural Development in Indonesia: The New Democratic Framework.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 39(2):193-214.

Anwar, Sakaria J., Kolopaking, Lala M., Kinseng, Rilus A., and Aida Vitayala S. Hubeis. 2014. “The Impact of State Intervention on Social Capital of Fishermen Community in Small Islands.” Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 6(2):246-259.

Bebbington, Anthoni. 1999. “Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty.” World Development 27(12):2021-44.

Bebbington, Anthoni, Dharmawan, Leni, Fahmi, Erwin, and Scott Guggenheim. 2006. “Local Capacity, Village Governance, and the Political Economy of Rural Development in Indonesia.” World Development 34(11):1958-76.

Chetri, Arun Katri, Joshi, Narendra M., and Keshav Lall Maharjan. 2007. “Intervention on Livelihood Management through Community Based Organization: Case of Rural Nepal.” Journal of International Development and Cooperation 13(1):187-206.

Grootaert, Christian, and Deepa Narayan. 2004. “Local Institutions, Poverty and Household Welfare in Bolivia.” World Development 32(7):1179-98.

Hadiz, Vedi R. 2004. “Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives.” Development and Change 35(4):697-718.

Handoyo, Eko. 2013. “Contribution of Social Capital in Improving the Social Welfare of Street Vendors after Relocation.” Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 5(2):252-266.

Husain, Fadly. 2011. “Sistem Budaya Bahari Komunitas Nelayan Lungkak Desa Tanjung Luar, Lombok Timur, Nusa Tenggara Barat.” Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 3(1):40-50.

Joshi, Narendra Mangal, and Keshav Lall Maharjan. 2007. “Institutional Changes in Forest Resource Management and Change in Forest Coverage in Nepal.” Journal of International Development and Cooperation 13(1):231-252.

Karmilah, Mila, Nuryanti, Wiendu, Soewarno, Nindyo, and Bakti Setiawan. 2014. “Pasedhuluran as a Social Capital for Local Economic Development: Evidence from Pottery Village.” Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 6(1):16-25.

Poteete, Amy R., and Elinor Ostrom. 2004. “Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management.” Development and Change 35(3):435-461.

Scoones, Ian. 2009. “Livelihoods Perspectives and Rural Development.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1):171-196.

Suandi. 2014. “The Relationships between Social Capital and Family Economic Well-Being in Rural Areas: Evidences From Jambi” Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 7(1):1-16

Sutiyo. 2013. “Decentralization: Potentiality and Challenge for Rural Development.” Journal of International Development and Cooperation 20(3):1-8.

Szreter, Simon. 2002. “The State of Social Capital: Bringing Back in Power, Politics, and History.” Theory and Society 31(5):573-621.

Takeshi, Ito. 2006. “The Dynamics of Local Governance Reform in Decentralizing Indonesia: Participatory Planning and Village Empowerment in Bandung, West Java.” Asian and African Area Studies 5(2):137-183.

Takeshi, Ito. 2007. Institutional Choices in the Shadow of History: Decentralization in Indonesia Washington D.C.: World Resource Institute.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.