Government Policies and Ethnical Diversity Under Multiculturalism: The Study of Pohuwato Regency

Sastro M Wantu(1),

(1) Faculty of Social Sciance State University of Gorontalo


This paper describes the construction of ethnic integration in Pohuwato local government policies which is supported by community under Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversiy) and multiculturalism. This research employed qualitative approach with the aim of tracing and analyzing social harmony from various ethnicities existing in society and government policy Pohuwato Regency. The instruments of the study included data, facts and concepts that were relevant. This study aimed to see the problem of segregation within societies by primordial groups to solve ethnic integration in which ethnic groups are bound together. There are two regional policies (1) controlling inter-ethnic relations and constructing the model of Gorontalo community as an important element of social, cultural and political aspect which uphold openness and tolerance; and (2) using deliberative public space in order to achieve harmonious atmosphere between public (community) with the government in protecting the diversity. Therefore, it can be concluded that ethnic communities residing in Pohuwato Regency are bound to unite by the desire to improve new and better lives between immigrants and local communities. This desire becomes a symbol of unity based on mutual respect for different values to achieve the integration or unity of multicultural ethnic groups.


Policy, government, diversity, ethnic, multiculturalism, harmonism

Full Text:



Ahimsa-Putra, S.H., 2009. Multikulturalisme, Pluralisme dan Lintas Budaya, Makalah Antropologi Budaya, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Baldwin, K., & Huber, J.D., 2010. Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 104(4), pp. 644-662.

Carter, D.A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G., 2010. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), pp. 396-414.

Dahlberg, M., Edmark, K., & Lundqvist, H., 2012. Ethnic diversity and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 120(1), pp. 41-76.

Effendi, S., 2010. Reformasi Tata Kepemerintahan, menyiapkan Aparatur Negara Untuk mendukung Demokratisasi Politik dan Ekonomi Terbuka. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B. A., 2016. Cultural Diversity: A Wake-Up Call for Parent Training–Republished Article. Behavior therapy, 47(6), pp. 981-992.

Gay, G., 2010. Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of teacher education, 61(1), pp. 143-152.

Gay, G., 2013. Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), pp. 48-70.

Harris, J., Kristian S., 2004. Politisasi Demokrasi: Politik Lokal baru. Demos, Jakarta.

Hefner, R., 2007. Multikulturalisme dan Kewarganegaraan di Malaysia, Singapura dan Indonesia, in Robert W. Hefner (ed) Politik Multikulturalisme, Menggugat Realitas Kebangsaan. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Kuncoro, M., 2013. Evaluasi Mid-Term RPJMD Kabupaten Pohuwato Provinsi Gorontalo 2010-2015. Bappeda Kabupaten Pohuwato, Pohuwato.

Kymlicka, W., 2011. Kewarganegaraan Multikultural. LP3ES, Jakarta.

Lancee, B., & Dronkers, J., 2011. Ethnic, religious and economic diversity in Dutch neighbourhoods: Explaining quality of contact with neighbours, trust in the neighbourhood and inter-ethnic trust. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(4), pp. 597-618.

Miles & Huberman. 1992. Analisa Data Kualitatif. UI Press, Jakarta.

Miller, D., 1993. In Defense of Nationality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 10(1), pp. 3-16

Muttarak, R., & Heath, A., 2010. Who intermarries in Britain? Explaining ethnic diversity in intermarriage patterns. The British journal of sociology, 61(2), pp. 275-305.

Nasikun, 1996. Pembangunan dan Dinamika Integrasi Nasional dalam Masyarakat Majemuk, in Heryanto, A. (ed) Nasionalisme Refleksi Kritis Kaum Ilmuwan. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Putnam. 1993. Making Domocracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

Rawls, J., 1980. Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The journal of philosophy, 77(9), pp.515-572.

Soetrisno, L., 2000. Kekerasan kolektif: Kondisi dan Pemicu. PPSK UGM, Yogyakarta.

Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., Read, S., & Allum, N., 2011. Does ethnic diversity erode trust? Putnam’s ‘hunkering down’thesis reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science, 41(1), pp. 57-82.

Taylor, C., 1991. Shared and Divergent Values, in Watts, R. & Brown D. (ed) Options for a New Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Vertovec, S., 2010. Towards post‐multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity. International social science journal, 61(199), pp. 83-95.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.