Pengaruh Tipe Pembelajaran dan Minat terhadap Kemampuan Renang Gaya Dada pada Mahasiswa PKLO FIK UNNES

Sungkowo -(1),


(1) Jurusan Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Abstract

The purpose of  research to determine the effect of  sintesis learning type, analisis learning type, interest of competence to swimm breast stroke. Subjects were 88 student. The results showed that analisis learning type with mean 71.273 and sintesis learning type type mean 71.636 of competence to swimm breast stroke F = 0,057 < F5%  =  3,95 and significantly 0,813 > 0,05. So there is not a difference of significantly. The value of high interest 75.000 and low interest 67.909. The result of value F 21,510  > F tabel = 3,95 with significantly value = 0,000 < 0,05. So there is difference the effect of high interest with low interest. The variables value (AB) of learning type and interest of competence to swimm breast stroke obtained the value F = 0,173 < F5%  = 3,95 with significantly  0,678 > 0,05 so there is not interaction of learning type and interest of competence to swimm breast stroke.  The result of conclution research is not difference the effect of high interest with low interest. So there is difference the effect of high interest with low interest. There is not interaction of learning type and interest of competence to swimm breast stroke.

Keywords

Analisis learning type; Sintesis; Interest; Breast stroke

Full Text:

PDF

References

Djaali. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Dumadi dan Kasiyo DW. 1992. Renang. Semarang : IKIP Semarang.

Harjanto. 2005. Perencanaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Haryanto. 2003. Teori Pembelajaran. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Himpunan Perundang-Undangan RI Tentang Guru dan Dosen. 2006. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

Husdarta dan Yudha. 2000. Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Bandung. Depdiknas: Direktoral Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Bagian Proyek Penataran Guru SLTP Setara – III.

Kerlinger. 2004. Asas – asas penelitian behavioral. Jogjakarta:Universitas Gajah Mada Press.

Maglischo, E.W.1993. Swimming Even Faster. Mayfeild Publishi Compeny. Mountain View. California.

Maslow. 1993. Motivasi Psikologi. Arifamrizal – Weblog. http://www. Teori Maslow.htm.

Muhibbin Syah. 2003. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mustaqim. 2004. Psikologi Pendidikan. IAIN Walisongo Semarang : Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Nana Sudjana. 1999. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ratna Willis D.1996. Teori – Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sardiman.2005. Interaksi Dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Kharisma Putra Utama Offet.

Slameto. 2003. Belajar Dan Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Soejoko Hendromartono. 1992. Olahraga Pilihan Renang. Depdikbud: Proyek Pembinaan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Sugiyanto dan Sudjarwo. 1993. Belajar Motorik. Jakarta: Depdikbud Proyek Peningkatan Mutu Guru Penjaskes SD Setara D-II.

Sukadi. 2006. Guru Powerful, Guru Masa Depan. Bandung: Kolbu

Sutrisno Hadi. 2001. Statistik Jilid II. Jogjakarta: Andi Offset.

Syahri Alhusin.2003. Aplikasi Statistik Praktis dengan SPSS.10 for Windows. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Tohar. 2004. Teori Belajar Pembelajaran. Semarang: Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga FIK UNNES.

Balitbang Depdiknas. 2002. Kurikulum Dan Hasil Belajar. Jakarta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Published by:
Department of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Gd. F1 Lt. 1 FIK-UNNES, Jalan Raya Sekaran Gunungpati Semarang Indonesia 50229, Telp/Fax: (024) 8508007

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.