DEVELOPMENT OF CHEMSITRY TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM THROUGH PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE TRAINING
(1) Chemistry Department, Mathematic and Natural Science Faculty,Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Chemistry Department, Mathematic and Natural Science Faculty,Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Chemistry Department, Mathematic and Natural Science Faculty,Universitas Negeri Semarang
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.F., & Mocerino, M. 2007. The Development of A Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.8(3), 293-307.
Depdiknas. 2004. Standar Kompetensi Guru Pemula Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Jenjang S1. Jakarta: Derektur Jenderal Perguruan Tinggi.
Depdiknas. 2007. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta
Eames, C., William, J. Hume, A and Lockley, J. 2012. CoRe: A way to build pedagogical content knowledge for beginning teachers. Artikel: Teaching & Learning Research Initiative,University of Waikato.
Eilks, I., Moellering, J. & Valanides, N. 2007. Seventh-grade Students’ Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 271-286.
Hamidah, D. Rustaman, Nuryani Y & Mariana, M. 2011. Pengembangan Profesional Guru Biologi SMA melalui Penerapan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Pada Materi Genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12 (2). Oktober 2011.
Harlen, W. (Ed). 2010. Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield, Heart: Association for Science Education.
Goolamhossen, F. 2013. A Study on Perception of Pre service School Teachers on the Importanceof Effective Communication Skills for Teaching. International Conference on Communication, media,Technology and Design. 02-04 May 2013. Farmagusta – North Cypruss
Haryani, S., Saptorini, Prasetya, T.P., 2013. Pengembangan Model Pembekalan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Pck) Melalui Perkuliahan Perencanaan Pengajaran Kimia. Laporan Penelitian Fundamental. LP2M Unnes.
Johnstone, A.H. 2000a. Teaching of Chemistry - Logical Or Psychological?. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice In Europe. 1(1).9-15.
Johnstone, A.H. 2000b. Chemical Education Research: Where from Here?. Proceeding University Chemistry Education. 4(1).34-38.
Loughran, John, Mulhall, Pamela and Berry, Amanda. 2008. Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Teacher Education. International Journal of Science Education.30:10,1301 — 1320
Loughran J., Amanda Berry & Pamela Mulhall (2006). Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Rotterdam : Sense Publishers. Loughran, J., Berry A., & Mulhall, P. 2012. Understanding and developing science teatchers’ pedagogical content knowledge Clayton: Monash University.
Loughran, J.J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R.F., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Science Cases in Action: Documenting Science Teachers Pedagogical Content Knowledge through PaPeRs. Research in Science Education, 31 (1), 267 289
Ozden, M. 2012. The effect of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: TheTeaching Phases of Matter. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 8 (2): 633-645 May 2008
Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Macroscopic, Symbolic, and Microscopic Levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Elsevier. 15.452–455..Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta
Purwaningsih, W. 2011. Pengembangan Program Pembekalan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Bioteknologi Melalui Perkuliahan Kapita Selekta Biologi SMA.. Ringkasan Disertasi pada FPS UPI Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.
Shulman, Lee S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57 (1), 1-22.
Talanquer, V. 2011.Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The Many Faces Of The Chemistry “Triplet” . International Journal of Science Education. Taylor & Francis. 33 (2), 179–195.
Tasker, R. & Dalton, R. 2006. Research Into Practice: Visualisation of The Molecular World Using Animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 7(2), 141-159.
Treagust, D.F., & Chandrasegaran, C. 2009. The Efficacy of An Alternative Instructional Programme Designed to Enhance Secondary Students’ Competence in The Triplet Relatioship”. Dalam Gilbert, J.K & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representation in Chemical Education: Models & Modelling in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer. 151-164.
Tuysuza, M. 2011. Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of Phase Changes and Dissolution at
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License