The Analysis and Optimization of Business Processes for Students in Higher Education Based on Togaf 9.2
(1) STMIK Amik Riau
(2) STMIK Amik Riau
(3) STMIK Amik Riau
(4) STMIK Amik Riau
(5) STMIK Amik Riau
Abstract
Purpose: The IT Blueprint is used as a guideline in achieving organizational goals, such as the built and development of information technology (IT) infrastructure. STMIK Amik Riau is one of the universities vision to become an excellent university in Sumatra by 2030. To achieve this vision, it is necessary to develop various units, one of which is the built and development of IT in student services. To build IT for student services, an enterprise architecture is needed so that the development is more focused. Study design: In this study, TOGAF became the framework used to design, plan, implement, and manage the company's organizational architecture. TOGAF has 8 phases, but this research takes 6 phases: Architecture Vision, Business Architecture, Information System Architectures, Technology Architecture, Opportunities and Solutions, and Migration Planning. Result: The results obtained in this study are the creation of IT blueprints for student business processes. There are several updates in each process, especially in the information system architecture, then in business processes and technology. There are also updates that need to be done. This study also provides several reasons for updating the Opportunity and Solutions. Other than that, this research guides to apply the updates based on priorities that must be applied to migration planning. Novelty: In the information system architecture, 18 applications become service systems for students. After analyzing it into 31 applications, they will later be used to support good services for students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Meranti and Irwansyah, “Kajian humas digital: transformasi dan kontribusi industri 4.0 pada stratejik kehumasan,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2018.
Pemerintah Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 22 Tahun 1961 Tentang Perguruan Tinggi. Indonesia, 1961.
Musrifah, “Implementasi teknologi informasi menggunakan human organization technology (HOT) fit model di perpustakaan perguruan tinggi,” in Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 2017, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 222–242.
S. Aswati, N. Mulyani, Y. Siagian, and A. Z. Syah, “Peranan sistem informasi dalam perguruan tinggi,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–86, 2015.
C. A. Rajan and R. Baral, “Adoption of ERP system: An empirical study of factors influencing the usage of ERP and its impact on end user,” IIMB Manag. Rev., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 105–117, 2015.
R. Setiawan, “Perancangan arsitektur enterprise untuk perguruan tinggi swasta menggunakan togaf ADM,” J. Algoritm., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 548–561, 2016.
E. Suseno, “Pemodelan arsitektur enterprise perguruan tinggi dengan metode togaf (studi kasus universitas nahdlatul ulama cirebon),” J. Cloud Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.
Y. Gong and M. Janssen, “The value of and myths about enterprise architecture,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 46, no. July 2017, pp. 1–9, 2019.
F. Saleem and B. Fakieh, “Enterprise architecture and organizational benefits: a case study,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 19, 2020.
A. A. Sari and A. D. Manuputty, “Perencanaan arsitektur enterprise menggunakan togaf adm (architecture development method) pada dinas kesehatan kota salatiga,” in SESINDO 2018, 2018, no. November.
S. Lolo, E. R. Kaburuan, and N. Legowo, “Analysis of enterprise architecture using the togaf framework in educational services,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 3386–3400, 2020.
N. Anggraini, Binariswanto, and N. Legowo, “Cloud computing adoption strategic planning using ROCCA and TOGAF 9.2: A study in government agency,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 1316–1324, 2019.
A. Supriatna, “Analisa penerapan togaf dan cobit dalam tata kelola teknologi informasi sebagai usulan pada kementerian energi dan sumber daya mineral,” in Seminar Nasional Informatika, vol. 2010, no. semnasIF, pp. 1–8, 2010,
A. Hodijah, S. Sundari, and A. C. Nugraha, “Applying TOGAF for e-government implementation based on service oriented architecture methodology towards good government governance,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1013, p. 012188, 2018.
A. Y. Eskaluspita and I. D. Sumitra, “The open group architecture framework for designing the enterprise architecture of ALIT,” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, vol. 879, no. 1.
M. E. L. Baz, M. M. Armand, C. Anong, and B. Mustapha, “ITIL Implementation in a moroccan stat organization : The case of incident management process,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 71–78, 2017.
D. Tomar, “TQM , ISO 9000 , Six sigma and CMMI project management in business and technology,” Softw. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020.
A. Gerber, P. Le Roux, and A. van der Merwe, “Enterprise architecture as explanatory information systems theory for understanding small-and medium-sized enterprise growth,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 20, pp. 1–31, 2020.
R. Khayami, “Qualitative characteristics of enterprise architecture,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1277–1282, 2011.
F. Gampfer, A. Jürgens, M. Müller, and R. Buchkremer, “Past, current and future trends in enterprise architecture—A view beyond the horizon,” Comput. Ind., vol. 100, pp. 70–84, 2018.
A. Josey, “An introduction to the TOGAF® standard, version 9.2,” The Open Group, no. April, The Open Group, Reading, UK, p. 22, 2018.
S. Kotusev, “TOGAF Version 9 . 2 : What ’ s New ?,” Br. Comput. Soc., no. June, pp. 1–4, 2018.
S. Husein and A. N. Fajar, “Design of a cloud based information system for education institution using TOGAF ADM,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 279–285, 2020.
H. Supriadi and E. Amalia, “University’s enterprise architecture design using enterprise architecture planning (EAP) based on the Zachman’s framework approach,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 13–28, 2019.
G. F. Nama, Tristiyanto, and Di. Kurniawan, “An enterprise architecture planning for higher education using the open group architecture framework (togaf): case study University of Lampung,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2017, 2018, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6.
Holilah, A. S. Girsang, and M. H. Saragih, “Designing IT blue print academic system on higher education with Togaf,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 244–250, 2019.
A. G. Tuwondila, M. N. N. Sitokdana, and A. F. Wijaya, “Perencanaan strategis SI/ TI pemerintahan menggunakan the open group architecture framework ( TOGAF),” in Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. Indones. November, 2018, pp. 1–6.
D. N. Murti, Y. A. Prasetyo, and A. A. N. Fajrillah, “Perancangan enterprise architecture pada fungsi sumber daya manusia (sdm) di universitas telkom menggunakan togaf ADM,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2017.
B. Noranita, D. M. K. Nugraheni, M. I. Fitriyani, and Y. Nurhayati, “Business architecture and information system architecture design in savings and payment unit Koperasi Pegawai Republik Indonesia (KPRI) Diponegoro University using TOGAF 9 framework,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1943, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2021.
C. Gellweiler, “Types of IT architects: A content analysis on tasks and skills,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 15–37, 2020.
M. Sidiq and I. D. Sumitra, “Strategic information systems planning using the togaf Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 662, no. 2, p. 022057, 2019.
S. A. Wulandari, A. P. Dewi, M. R. Pohan, D. I. Sensuse, M. Mishbah, and Syamsudin, “Risk assessment and recommendation strategy based on COBIT 5 for risk: Case study SIKN JIKN helpdesk service,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 168–177, 2019.
H. M. Astuti, F. A. Muqtadiroh, E. W. Tyas Darmaningrat, and C. U. Putri, “Risks assessment of information technology processes based on COBIT 5 framework: A case study of ITS service desk,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 124, pp. 569–576, 2017.
C. Silva, P. Ribeiro, E. B. Pinto, and P. Monteiro, “Maturity model for collaborative R&D university-industry sustainable partnerships,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, pp. 811–817, 2021.
E. S. Pane and R. Sarno, “Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) for Optimizing Object-Oriented Analysis and Design (OOAD),” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 72, no. Cmmi, pp. 40–48, 2015.
S. Sitinjak, “Pengukuran tingkat kematangan keselarasan strategi teknologi informasi dan bisnis badan kepegawaian daerah provinsi …,” in Soliter, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 143–152, [Online]. Available: https://www.soliter.ulm.ac.id/index.php/soliter/article/view/63.
M. Gërvalla, N. Preniqi, and P. Kopacek, “IT infrastructure library (ITIL) framework approach to IT governance,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, vol. 51, no. 30, pp. 181–185.
N. Ahmad and Z. M. Shamsudin, “Systematic approach to successful implementation of ITIL,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 17, pp. 237–244, 2013.
N. H. Harani, A. A. Arman, and R. M. Awangga, “Improving TOGAF ADM 9.1 Migration Planning Phase by ITIL V3 Service Transition,” in J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2018, vol. 1007, no. 1.
O. N. Putra and S. Kuswayati, “Penerapan togaf ADM dan ITIL dalam pengembangan enterperise architecture,” Media Inform., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 82–90, 2017.
T. Van Sante and J. Ermers, ITIL ® and TOGAF ® 9.1: two frameworks, no. August. 2013.
A. Cartlidge et al., An Introductory Overview of ITIL®2011, This versi. London: TSO (The Stationery Office), 2011.
M. K. Anam, N. Lizarti, and A. N. Ulfah, “Analisa tingkat kematangan sistem informasi akademik STMIK amik riau menggunakan ITIL v3 domain service operation,” Fountain Informatics J., vol. 4, no. 1, 2019.
The Open Group, “The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2,” pubs.opengroup.org, 2018. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf92-doc/arch/ (accessed May 29, 2020).
H. Santoso, A. Rasidi, and M. R. Arif, “Perencanaan arsitektur enterpise sistem informasi untuk perguruan tinggi dengan zachman framework,” Res. Comput. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 32, 2018.
L. Anastasiu, “The importance of applying the value chain analysis in the higher education system,” in Int. Conf. Appl. Res. bus. Manag. Econ., 2019, pp. 2–13.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Scientific Journal of Informatics (SJI)
p-ISSN 2407-7658 | e-ISSN 2460-0040
Published By Department of Computer Science Universitas Negeri Semarang
Website: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/sji
Email: [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.