Effect of Traditional and Software-Defined Networking on Performance of Computer Network

Isiaka Babatunde Sadiku(1), Wumi Ajayi(2), Wilson Sakpere(3), Temilola John-Dewole(4), R A Badru(5),


(1) Department of Computer Science, Lead City University, Nigeria
(2) Department of Computer Science, Lead City University, Nigeria
(3) Department of Computer Science, Lead City University, Nigeria
(4) Department of Computer Science, Lead City University, Nigeria
(5) Department of Computer Science, Lead City University, Nigeria

Abstract

Purpose: Computer networks and the Internet are changing the way we communicate, learn, work, and even play. Conventional computer networks are not smart enough towards processes that contribute to improving online control transaction of services and demand for unlimited communication services. Hence, computer networking has to go smart.
Methods: This paper explores the effect of different computer networking types - traditional computer networking (D0) and Software-Defined Networking (D1). The paper combined traditional computer networking (D0) with Software-Defined Network (D2) running applications (A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5) with the host sending 5 packets (P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5) across the networks emulated using Mininet network emulation to observe various performance parameters on the network.
Result: It was observed that Application A1 recorded the highest bandwidth, throughput and latency. The least bandwidth, throughput and latency were observed in A4. The result showed that below 80% of the IPv4 packet size (65,507 bytes) of running application, the higher the bandwidth the higher the throughput. Also, the lower the latency the more statistically similar the jitter experienced. Packet P1 has the highest bandwidth and throughput usage with high latency. The results indicate that the higher the bandwidth and throughput, the higher the latency observed in the packet sent across the network. Traditional computer networking (D1) recorded the highest bandwidth and throughput with the highest jitter. The correlation result showed that the jitter decreases with increasing bandwidth and throughput.
Novelty: This study provides information on traditional computer networking and Software-Defined Networking. The result validates studies that observed significant F-value and stability in the SDN application-awareness experiment.

 

 

Keywords

Keywords: smart network, bytes size, application, bandwidth, throughput, latency, jitter

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. Makridakis, “The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms”, Futures, vol. 90, pp. 46-60, 2017.

M. Meeker, Internet trends, pp. 1-294, Kleiner Perkins, 2018.

J. Firth, J. Torous, B. Stubbs, J. A. Firth, G. Z. Steiner, L. Smith, M. Alvarez-Jimenez, J. Gleeson, D. Vancampfort, C. J. Armitage, and J. Sarris, “The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition”, World Psychiatry, vol. 18, issue 2, pp. 119-129, 2019.

W. Sakpere, M. Adeyeye-Oshin, and N.B.W. Mlitwa, “A state-of-the-art survey of indoor positioning and navigation systems and technologies”, South African Computer Journal (SACJ), vol. 29, no 3, pp. 145-197, 2017.

W. S. Ajayi and O. Awodele, “Evolution of Digital Edifices: from Shanks and Adobe to Smart and Intelligent Edifice; a Trail to the Future”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 11-17, 2017.

L. Nacshon, R. Puzis, and P. Zilberman, “Floware: Balanced flow monitoring in software defined networks”, arXiv:1608.03307, pp. 1-13, 2016.

D. V. Khoa, and Khanh, T. N. N., “Emulation of software-defined network using mininet”, Dalat University Journal of Science, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 80-92, 2021.

E. Sturzinger, and S. Cilenti, “A Hybrid Software Defined Network Platform for Undergraduate Research and Education” in West Point Research Papers, Proceedings of The National Conference On Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2019, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, April 11-13, 2019, pp. 1016-1023, 2019.

M. Jadin, O. Tilmans, M. Mawait, and O. Bonaventure, “Educational Virtual Routing Labs with IP Mininet”, in ACM SIGCOMM Education Workshop 2020, pp. 1-5, 2020.

X. Yuan, Z. Liu, Y. Park, H. Hu, and H. Li, “Teaching SDN Security Using Hands-on Labs in CloudLab”, Journal of the Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2020.

V. Koryachko, D. Perepelkin, M. Ivanchikova, V. Byshov, and I. Tsyganov, “Analysis of QoS metrics in software defined networks”, in 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), 2017, pp. 1-5, IEEE, doi: 10.1109/MECO.2017.7977240.

S. Salsano, P. L. Ventre, F. Lombardo, G. Siracusano, M. Gerola, E. Salvadori, ... and L. Prete, “Hybrid IP/SDN Networking: Open Implementation and Experiment Management Tools,” in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 138-153, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2015.2507622.

Y. Wei, X. Zhang, L. Xie and S. Leng, “Energy-aware traffic engineering in hybrid SDN/IP backbone networks,” Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 559-566, 2016, doi: 10.1109/JCN.2016.000079.

H. Yang, H. Li and Q. Wu, “IP-Stream Oriented Management Mechanism in 802.11 Wireless Network by Extending SDN,” 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2017, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2017.7925831.

J. H. P. Duque, D. O. D. Beltrán and G. A. P. Leguizamón, “On the features of Software Defined Networking for the QoS provision in data networks,” INGE CUC, vol. 14, no 2, pp. 106-115, 2018, doi: 10.17981/ingecuc.14.2.2018.10.

H. P. Nugroho, M. Irfan and A. Faruq, “Software Defined Networks: A Comparative Study and Quality of Services Evaluation,” Scientific Journal of Informatics, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 181-192, 2019, doi: 10.15294/sji.v6i2.20585.

N. Hu, F. Luan, X. Tian and C. Wu, “A Novel SDN-Based Application-Awareness Mechanism by Using Deep Learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 160921-160930, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021185.

J. P. Chaudhari, D. K. Kirange, K. S. Bhagat and S. D. Patil, “Evaluation of Bandwidth Utilization in SDN,” Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 21-30, 2019.

L. L. Zulu, K. A. Ogudo and P. O. Umenne, “Emulating Software Defined Network Using Mininet and OpenDaylight Controller Hosted on Amazon Web Services Cloud Platform to Demonstrate a Realistic Programmable Network,” 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC), 2018, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/ICONIC.2018.8601254.

M. T. Islam, N. Islam, and M. Al Refat, “Node to node performance evaluation through RYU SDN controller,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 112, pp. 555–570, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11277-020-07060-4, 1-16.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Scientific Journal of Informatics (SJI)
p-ISSN 2407-7658 | e-ISSN 2460-0040
Published By Department of Computer Science Universitas Negeri Semarang
Website: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/sji
Email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.