THE PERFORMANCE OF EXPRESSIVE SPEECH ACTS AS FOUND ON WAYNE ROONEY’S FACEBOOK
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
People tended to show off their feelings in public. It meant that certain expressive acts were used. This study was to classify what types of expressive speech act were performed by Wayne Rooney on his Facebook, to describe how the expressive speech acts were performed by Wayne Rooney on his Facebook, and to describe how the effects of expressive speech acts performed by Wayne Rooney on the hearers. This study was using descriptive qualitative approach. The findings were that there were four types of expressive speech act on Wayne Rooney’s Facebook. They were congratulating, complimenting, thanking, and boasting. Expressive speech act of boasting was the most dominant one, namely 46%. Furthermore, each type was performed by Wayne Rooney either with direct expressive speech acts, or with the addition of preparatory acts, supportive acts, as well as the combination of both of them to modify the head acts as the main messages. Expressive speech acts of congratulating tended to cause the hearers to respond the same as what the speaker intended, namely congratulating. Meanwhile, expressive speech acts of complimenting, thanking, and boasting were most likely to cause the hearers to produce a large number of compliments as the responses.Â
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. 2003. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entry.In http://online,sfsu,edu/~kbach/spchacts.html.[Accessed on October 2010].
Bayat, Nihat. 2013. A study on the Use of Speech Acts. Science Direct. 213 – 221.
Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim. 2013. The Cambridge Dictionary of Linguistics.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Coulthard, M. 1977. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Cresswell, John, W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second Edition). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
Fetzer, Anita. 2013. The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Grundy, P. 1995. Doing Pragmatics. New York: Edward Arnold.
Hiani, K, E. 2015. Performing Speech Acts among Moroccan EFL Advanced Learners.Science Direct. 479 – 485.
Http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary. [Accessed on January 2016].
Http://www.yourdictionary.com/Facebook. [Accessed on December 2015].
Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_act. [Accessed on December 2015].
Https://Zephoria.Com/Top-15-Valuable-Facebook-Statistics/. [Accessed on March 2016].
Ilyas, Sanaa and Khushi, Qamar. 2012. Facebook Status Updates: A Speech Act Analysis.SAVAP International.Vol.3, No.2.
Leech, G. 1983. The Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
Mey, J.L. 1993. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Owens, Jr. Robert E. 2000.Language Development: An Introduction.Fifth Edition. New York: State University of New York Genesco.
Petrus, Klaus. 2010. Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice.New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.
Qiang, Kang. 2013. OnPerlocutionary Act.CSCanada. 60 – 64.
Sari, N. 1988.An Introduction to Linguistics. Jakarta: DepartemenPendidikandanKebudayaan.
Searle, J.R. 1969.Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R., and Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Stubbs, M. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguististic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Thomas, R, Murray. 2003. Blending Qualitative & Quantitative Research Method in Theses and Dissertations. The United States of America: Corwin Press, Inc.
Trillo, R.J. 2012.Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching. Netherlands: Springer.
Verschueren, J and Ostman, J.O. 2009.Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Banjamin Publishing Company.