HEDGES IN CLASSROOM SPEECHES BY ENGLISH STUDENTS IN GRADUATE PROGRAM

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Arina Yuliarti
Warsono Warsono

Abstract

Sometimes, students need to present learning materials in front of the class. In this classroom speech, they need to deliver their speech appropriately so that the information can be accepted well. Consequently, they often hedge their utterances. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyse the ways students use hedges in their classroom speeches. This study aimed at analysing the forms and functions of the hedges and the factors which might constrain the use of the hedges. The subjects were 15 students of graduate program majoring English Language Education in Semarang State University. Their classroom speeches were recorded as source of the data. Based on the findings, it could be identified that the students hedged their sentences during classroom speeches frequently. In average, students hedged around 58% of their entire sentences. Seven forms and four functions of hedges were used by students effectively and significantly. The students mainly hedged their sentences using approximator, introductory phrase, and modal-auxiliary verb forms. Plausibility and attributive shield functions were often used to soften their attitude toward the truth value of the information they presented. It could also be identified that there were five factors constraining the use of the hedges during their classroom speeches.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Yuliarti, A., & Warsono, W. (2016). HEDGES IN CLASSROOM SPEECHES BY ENGLISH STUDENTS IN GRADUATE PROGRAM. English Education Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/12773

References

Alonso, A. R., et al. 2012. Hedging: An Exploratory Study of Pragmatic Transfer in Non-native English Readers’ Rhetorical preferences.Iberica Journal, vol 23. Pp. 47-64.
Boncea, Irina J. 2013. Hedging Patterns Used as Mitigation and Politeness Strategies. Annals of the University of Craiova, vol. 2. Pp. 7-23.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging. New Approach to Hedging Journal. Pp. 15-34.
Hua, Jiang. 2011. A Study of Pragmatic Functions of Hedges Applied by College English Teachers in the Class. In Journal of M & D Forum from Foreign Studies Polytechnic University, China. Pp. 562-566.
Lafi, A. Nawas, et al. 2011. Conventional Indirectness, Questions, and Hedge as Negative Politeness Strategies. Journal of Linguistics. Pp. 1-12.
Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concept. In Papers from the Eight Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society. Pp. 183-228.
Lavinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Salager-Meyer, Francoise. 1997. I Think that Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse. Journal of Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Pp. 105-118.